When cross compiling for a new host, we can't actually run the host compiler to
generate its own libs. In theory, however, all stage2 compilers (for any host)
will produce the same libraries, so we just require the build compiler to
produce the necessary host libraries and then we link those into place.
This switches the defaults to ensure that everything is built with the build
compiler rather than the host compiler itself (which we're not guaranteed to be
able to run)
Currently all multi-host builds assume the the build platform can run the
`llvm-config` binary generated for each host platform we're creating a compiler
for. Unfortunately this assumption isn't always true when cross compiling, so we
need to handle this case.
This commit alters the build script of `rustc_llvm` to understand when it's
running an `llvm-config` which is different than the platform we're targeting for.
This commit fixes a longstanding issue with the makefiles where all host
platforms bootstrap themselves. This commit alters the build logic for the
bootstrap to instead only bootstrap the build triple, and all other compilers
are compiled from that one compiler.
The benefit of this change is that we can cross-compile compilers which cannot
run on the build platform. For example our builders could start creating
`arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf` compilers.
This reduces the amount of bootstrapping we do, reducing the amount of test
coverage, but overall it should largely just end in faster build times for
multi-host compiles as well as enabling a feature which can't be done today.
cc #5258
Also back out keepalive support for TCP since the API is perhaps not
actually what we want. You can't read the interval on Windows, and
we should probably separate the functionality of turning keepalive on
and overriding the interval.
Refinement of paragraph referenced by [this issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/31927).
The paragraph in question had been adjusted already, but I've made some further clarifications which should help with readability and not leave the reader any `dangling pointers`.
In particular, uses of inclusive ranges within the standard library are
still waiting. Slices and collections can be sliced with `usize` and
`Range*<usize>`, but not yet `Range*Inclusive<usize>`.
Also, we need to figure out what to do about `RangeArgument`. Currently
it has `start()` and `end()` methods which are pretty much identical to
`Range::start` and `Range::end`. For the same reason as Range itself,
these methods can't express a range such as `0...255u8` without
overflow. The easiest choice, it seems to me, is either changing the
meaning of `end()` to be inclusive, or adding a new method, say
`last()`, that is inclusive and specifying that `end()` returns `None`
in cases where it would overflow. Changing the semantics would be a
breaking change, but `RangeArgument` is unstable so maybe we should do
it anyway.
Since the desugaring removed special handling for ranges, the error
message changed and so I had to adjust `range-1`.
Turns out there was a bug where borrowck was too restrictive in some
rare cases of constructing ranges from literals. The `range-2` test
enshrined this bug -- now it's adjusted to test a case that's actually
wrong.
Mostly copy the tests from half-open ranges, adding some more for
DoubleEndedIterator and ExactSizeIterator.
Also thoroughly (I think) test that the feature gates are working.
The range desugaring does not use the lang items. Hence I did not add
lang items for inclusive ranges. This cleanup commit removes the old
unused ones as well.
Whether the desugaring _should_ use lang items is another question:
see #30809. But if we decide on a strategy there we can add back these
lang items, and new ones for inclusive ranges.
For stage0 we need to keep the attributes as the lang items still exist
even if they are never used.
This is surprisingly not a breaking change. Unused #[lang] attributes do
not even trigger a lint (see #30881).
A whole bunch of stuff gets folded into struct handling! Plus, removes
an ugly hack from trans and accidentally fixes a bug with constructing
ranges from references (see later commits with tests).
These `_post` methods are quite helpful to control lint behavior without storing e.g. block node ids. So here are a few more I believe will be helpful.
r? @Manishearth
For summary descriptions we need the first paragraph (adjacent lines
until a blank line) - but the rendered markdown of a code block did not
leave a blank line in the html and was thus included in the summary line.
