Add new `rustc` target for Arm64 machines that can target the iphonesimulator
This PR lands a new target (`aarch64-apple-ios-sim`) that targets arm64 iphone simulator, previously unreachable from Apple Silicon machines.
resolves#81632
r? `@shepmaster`
LLVM picks the right things to put into the compiled object file based
on the target deployment version.
We need to communicate it through the target triple.
Only with that LLVM will use the right commands in the file to make it
look and behave like code compiled for the arm64 iOS simulator target.
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #80595 (`impl PartialEq<Punct> for char`; symmetry for #78636)
- #81991 (Fix panic in 'remove semicolon' when types are not local)
- #82176 (fix MIR fn-ptr pretty-printing)
- #82244 (Keep consistency in example for Stdin StdinLock)
- #82260 (rustc: Show ``@path`` usage in stable)
- #82316 (Fix minor mistake in LTO docs.)
- #82332 (Don't generate src link on dummy spans)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
fix MIR fn-ptr pretty-printing
An uninitialized function pointer would get printed as `{{uninit fn()}` (notice the unbalanced parentheses), and a dangling fn ptr would ICE. This fixes both of that.
However, I have no idea how to add tests for this.
Also, I don't understand this MIR pretty-printing code. Somehow the print function `pretty_print_const_scalar` actually *returns* a transformed form of the const (but there is no doc comment explaining what is being returned); some match arms do `p!` while others do `self =`, and there's a wild mixture of `p!` and `write!`... all very mysterious and confusing.^^
r? ``@oli-obk``
Fix panic in 'remove semicolon' when types are not local
It's not possible to check if removing a semicolon fixes the type error
when checking match arms and one or both of the last arm's and the
current arm's return types are imported "opaque" types. In these cases
we don't generate a "consider removing semicolon" suggestions.
Fixes#81839
---
I'm not sure how to add a test for this. I think the test would need at least two crates. Do we have any existing tests that do this so that I can take a look?
Move the query engine out of rustc_middle
The handling of queries is moved to a trait `QueryEngine`.
It replaces `query::Queries` in the `TyCtxt`, allowing to move the query engine out of librustc_middle.
There are 2 modes to access the query engine: through `TyCtxt` and dynamic dispatch,
or through a `QueryCtxt`. The `QueryCtxt` is required for everything touching the `OnDiskCache`.
For now, I put it in librustc_incremental, which is very small.
This may not be the best place.
A significant part of the codegen time for librustc_middle is moved to the recipient crate.
This PR may require a perf run.
cc #65031
r? `@Zoxc`
