Addresses #3283
Rather than using custom UI for showing the loaded state. Rely
on the WorkDoneProgress API in 3.15.0
https://microsoft.github.io/language-server-protocol/specification#workDoneProgress.
No client-side work was necessary. The UI is not exactly what is
described in the issue but afaict that's how VS Code implements the LSP
API.
- The WorkDoneProgressEnd does not appear to display its message
contents (controlled by vscode)
3561: feat: add debug code lens r=matklad a=hdevalke
Refs #3539
3577: Protect against infinite macro expansion in def collector r=edwin0cheng a=flodiebold
Something I noticed while trying to make macro expansion more resilient against errors.
There was a test for this, but it wasn't actually working because the first recursive expansion failed. (The comma...)
Even with this limit, that test (when fixed) still takes some time to pass because of the exponential growth of the expansions, so I disabled it and added a different one without growth.
CC @edwin0cheng
Co-authored-by: Hannes De Valkeneer <hannes@de-valkeneer.be>
Co-authored-by: hdevalke <2261239+hdevalke@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Florian Diebold <florian.diebold@freiheit.com>
There was a test for this, but it wasn't actually working because the first
recursive expansion failed. (The comma...)
Even with this limit, that test (when fixed) still takes some time to pass
because of the exponential growth of the expansions, so I disabled it and added
a different one without growth.
3574: Fix completion of HashMap::new r=matklad a=flodiebold
The `ty` function in code_model returned the type with placeholders for type parameters. That's nice for printing, but not good for completion, because placeholders won't unify with anything else: So the type we got for `HashMap` was `HashMap<K, V, T>`, which doesn't unify with `HashMap<?, ?, RandomState>`, so the `new` method wasn't shown.
Now we instead return `HashMap<{unknown}, {unknown}, {unknown}>`, which does unify with the impl type. Maybe we should just expose this properly as variables though, i.e. we'd return something like `exists<type, type, type> HashMap<?0, ?1, ?2>` (in Chalk notation). It'll make the API more complicated, but harder to misuse. (And it would handle cases like `type TypeAlias<T> = HashMap<T, T>` more correctly.)
The `ty` function for fields was used for signature help, so there we want placeholders so that it looks nicer, I think. Hence I renamed it to `signature_ty`.
Co-authored-by: Florian Diebold <florian.diebold@freiheit.com>
The `ty` function in code_model returned the type with placeholders for type
parameters. That's nice for printing, but not good for completion, because
placeholders won't unify with anything else: So the type we got for `HashMap`
was `HashMap<K, V, T>`, which doesn't unify with `HashMap<?, ?, RandomState>`,
so the `new` method wasn't shown.
Now we instead return `HashMap<{unknown}, {unknown}, {unknown}>`, which does
unify with the impl type. Maybe we should just expose this properly as variables
though, i.e. we'd return something like `exists<type, type, type> HashMap<?0,
?1, ?2>` (in Chalk notation). It'll make the API more complicated, but harder to
misuse. (And it would handle cases like `type TypeAlias<T> = HashMap<T, T>` more
correctly.)
Previously, if the root of the was was a real crate, only this crate
was checked.
Ideally, we might want some kind of config here (which might be just
overriding the whole command), but `--workspace` is def a nicer
default.
3553: Completions do not show for function with same name as mod r=matklad a=JoshMcguigan
fixes#3444
I've added a test case in `crates/ra_ide/src/completion/complete_path.rs` which verifies the described behavior in #3444. Digging in, I found that [the module scope iterator](ba62d8bd1c/crates/ra_ide/src/completion/complete_path.rs (L22)) only provides the module `z`, and does not provide the function `z` (although if I name the function something else then it does show up here).
I thought perhaps the name wasn't being properly resolved, but I added a test in `crates/ra_hir_def/src/nameres/tests.rs` which seems to suggest that it is? I've tried to figure out how to bridge the gap between these two tests (one passing, one failing) to see where the function `z` is being dropped, but to this point I haven't been able to track it down.
Any pointers on where I might look for this?
Co-authored-by: Josh Mcguigan <joshmcg88@gmail.com>
3543: Parameter inlay hint separate from variable type inlay? #2876 r=matklad a=slyngbaek
Add setting to allow enabling either type inlay hints or parameter
inlay hints or both. Group the the max inlay hint length option
into the object.
- Add a new type for the inlayHint options.
- Add tests to ensure the inlays don't happen on the server side
Co-authored-by: Steffen Lyngbaek <steffenlyngbaek@gmail.com>
3559: Implement builtin assert! macro r=matklad a=edwin0cheng
This PR add a dummy implementation for `assert!` macro, which mainly make `hover` and `goto-def` works on arguments inside it.
Co-authored-by: Edwin Cheng <edwin0cheng@gmail.com>
3556: settings: rust-analyzer.cargo-watch.enable: clarify that the setting … r=matklad a=matthiaskrgr
…enables the cargo-watch command and not "cargo check"
Co-authored-by: Matthias Krüger <matthias.krueger@famsik.de>
3564: Better handling of a few kinds of cargo/clippy diagnostics r=matklad a=kiljacken
This was initially supposed to just be a fix for #3433, but I caught a few things that ended up being useful as well.
This PR primarily makes us handle multi-edit fix suggestions properly. Instead of just applying the first fix we apply all the parts of the fix in a single action.
Second up, this PR handles diagnostics with multiple primary spans, f.x. the unused import diagnostic from rustc:
The LSP doesn't handle this too well, as it only support a single complete range for each diagnostic, so we get duplicate messages in the problem panel of VSCode:
However, I feel like the improved visual aspect in-editor outweighs the duplication in the problem panel. I'm open to not including the second commit if anybody really doesn't like the idea of duplicate diagnostics in the problem pane.
Fixes#3433Fixes#3257
Co-authored-by: Emil Lauridsen <mine809@gmail.com>
