This requires avoiding `quote_...!` for constructing the parts of the
__test module, since that stringifies and reinterns the idents, losing
the special gensym'd nature of them. (#15962.)
This leaves the `Share` trait at `std::kinds` via a `#[deprecated]` `pub use`
statement, but the `NoShare` struct is no longer part of `std::kinds::marker`
due to #12660 (the build cannot bootstrap otherwise).
All code referencing the `Share` trait should now reference the `Sync` trait,
and all code referencing the `NoShare` type should now reference the `NoSync`
type. The functionality and meaning of this trait have not changed, only the
naming.
Closes#16281
[breaking-change]
This leaves the `Share` trait at `std::kinds` via a `#[deprecated]` `pub use`
statement, but the `NoShare` struct is no longer part of `std::kinds::marker`
due to #12660 (the build cannot bootstrap otherwise).
All code referencing the `Share` trait should now reference the `Sync` trait,
and all code referencing the `NoShare` type should now reference the `NoSync`
type. The functionality and meaning of this trait have not changed, only the
naming.
Closes#16281
[breaking-change]
This requires avoiding `quote_...!` for constructing the parts of the
__test module, since that stringifies and reinterns the idents, losing
the special gensym'd nature of them. (#15962.)
meaning `'b outlives 'a`. Syntax currently does nothing but is needed for full
fix to #5763. To use this syntax, the issue_5763_bootstrap feature guard is
required.
Generic extern functions written in Rust have their names mangled, as well as their internal clownshoe __rust_abi functions. This allows e.g. specific monomorphizations of these functions to be used as callbacks.
Closes#12502.
Fixes missing overflow lint for i64 #14269
The `type_overflow` lint, doesn't catch the overflow for `i64` because the overflow happens earlier in the parse phase when the `u64` as biggest possible int gets casted to `i64` , without checking the for
overflows.
We can't lint in the parse phase, so we emit a compiler error, as we do for overflowing `u64`
Perhaps a consistent behaviour would be to emit a parse error for *all* overflowing integer types.
See #14269
The `type_overflow` lint, doesn't catch the overflow for `i64` because
the overflow happens earlier in the parse phase when the `u64` as biggest
possible int gets casted to `i64` , without checking the for overflows.
We can't lint in the parse phase, so a refactoring of the `LitInt` type
was necessary.
The types `LitInt`, `LitUint` and `LitIntUnsuffixed` where merged to one
type `LitInt` which stores it's value as `u64`. An additional parameter was
added which indicate the signedness of the type and the sign of the value.
As discovered in #15460, a particular #[link(kind = "static", ...)] line is not
actually guaranteed to link the library at all. The reason for this is that if
the external library doesn't have any referenced symbols in the object generated
by rustc, the entire library is dropped by the linker.
For dynamic native libraries, this is solved by passing -lfoo for all downstream
compilations unconditionally. For static libraries in rlibs this is solved
because the entire archive is bundled in the rlib. The only situation in which
this was a problem was when a static native library was linked to a rust dynamic
library.
This commit brings the behavior of dylibs in line with rlibs by passing the
--whole-archive flag to the linker when linking native libraries. On OSX, this
uses the -force_load flag. This flag ensures that the entire archive is
considered candidate for being linked into the final dynamic library.
This is a breaking change because if any static library is included twice in the
same compilation unit then the linker will start emitting errors about duplicate
definitions now. The fix for this would involve only statically linking to a
library once.
Closes#15460
[breaking-change]
Using the Show impl for Names created global symbols with names like
`"str\"str\"(1027)"`. This adjusts strings, binaries and vtables to
avoid using that impl.
Using the Show impl for Names created global symbols with names like
`"str\"str\"(1027)"`. This adjusts strings, binaries and vtables to
avoid using that impl.
Fixes#15799.
Before this commit, the LLVM IR of exported items was simply zip-compressed and stored as an object file inside rlib archives. This commit adds a header to this "object" containing a file identifier and a format version number so the compiler can deal with changes in the way bytecode objects are stored within rlibs.
While updating the format of bytecode objects, this commit also worksaround a problem in LLDB which could not handle odd-sized objects within archives before mid-2014.
This is an alternative to upgrading the way rvalues are handled in the
borrow check. Making rvalues handled more like lvalues in the borrow
check caused numerous problems related to double mutable borrows and
rvalue scopes. Rather than come up with more borrow check rules to try
to solve these problems, I decided to just forbid pattern bindings after
`@`. This affected fewer than 10 lines of code in the compiler and
libraries.
This breaks code like:
match x {
y @ z => { ... }
}
match a {
b @ Some(c) => { ... }
}
Change this code to use nested `match` or `let` expressions. For
example:
match x {
y => {
let z = y;
...
}
}
match a {
Some(c) => {
let b = Some(c);
...
}
}
Closes#14587.
[breaking-change]
When generating a unique symbol for things like closures or glue_drop,
we call token::gensym() to create a crate-unique Name. Recently, Name
changed its Show impl so it no longer prints as a number. This caused
symbols like glue_drop:1542 to become glue_drop:"glue_drop"(1542), or in
mangled form, glue_drop.$x22glue_drop$x22$LP$1542$RP$.
When generating a unique symbol for things like closures or glue_drop,
we call token::gensym() to create a crate-unique Name. Recently, Name
changed its Show impl so it no longer prints as a number. This caused
symbols like glue_drop:1542 to become glue_drop:"glue_drop"(1542), or in
mangled form, glue_drop.$x22glue_drop$x22$LP$1542$RP$.
Note: This PR is motivated by an attempt to write an custom syntax extension that tried to use `syntax::fold`, and that could only do so by fixing bugs in it and copying out private functions.
---
Refactored `syntax::fold`
Prior to this, the code there had a few issues:
- Default implementations inconsistenly either had the prefix `noop_` or
not.
- Some default methods where implemented in terms of a public noop function
for user code to call, others where implemented directly on the trait
and did not allow users of the trait to reuse the code.
- Some of the default implementations where private, and thus not reusable
for other implementors.
- There where some bugs where default implemntations called other default
implementations directly, rather than to the underlying Folder, with the
result of some ast nodes never being visted even if the user implemented that
method. (For example, the current Folder never folded struct fields)
This commit solves this situation somewhat radically by making __all__
`fold_...` functions in the module into Folder methods, and implementing
them all in terms of public `noop_...` functions for other implementors to
call out to.
Some public functions had to be renamed to fit the new system, so this is a
breaking change.
---
Also added a few trait implementations to `ast` types
Not included are two required patches:
* LLVM: segmented stack support for DragonFly [1]
* jemalloc: simple configure patches
[1]: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4705
Our implementation of ebml has diverged from the standard in order
to better serve the needs of the compiler, so it doesn't make much
sense to call what we have ebml anyore. Furthermore, our implementation
is pretty crufty, and should eventually be rewritten into a format
that better suits the needs of the compiler. This patch factors out
serialize::ebml into librbml, otherwise known as the Really Bad
Markup Language. This is a stopgap library that shouldn't be used
by end users, and will eventually be replaced by something better.
[breaking-change]
Currently, each time a function is monomorphized, all items within that function are translated. This is unnecessary work because the inner items already get translated when the function declaration is visited by `trans_item`. This patch adds a flag to the `FunctionContext` to prevent translation of items during monomorphization.
Remove the ability of the borrow checker to determine that repeated
dereferences of a Box<T> refer to the same memory object. This will
usually require one of two workarounds:
1) The interior of a Box<T> will sometimes need to be moved / borrowed
into a temporary before moving / borrowing individual derived paths.
2) A `ref x` pattern will have to be replaced with a `box ref x`
pattern.
Fixes#16094.
[breaking-change]
When dealing with HTTP request or responses, many tokens are case-insensitive in the ASCII range but the bytes from the network are not necessarily valid UTF-8.
**[breaking-change]** Rather than adding new very similar traits, this re-uses the `std::ascii::OwnedStrAsciiExt` and `std::ascii::StrAsciiExt` traits, but rename to remove `Str` since that does not apply for bytes.
This PR also makes `std::ascii::ASCII_UPPER_MAP` and `std::ascii::ASCII_LOWER_MAP`, the lookup table all these methods are based on, public. In case there is something else related to ASCII case we haven’t thought of yet, that can be implemented outside of libstd without duplicating the tables.
Although this is a breaking change, I thought this could do without an RFC since the relevant traits are not in the prelude.
r? @alexcrichton
When rustc produces an rlib, it includes the contents of each static library required by the crate. Currently each static library is added individually, by extracting the library with `ar x` and adding the objects to the rlib using `ar r`. Each `ar r` has significant overhead - it appears to scan through the full contents of the rlib before adding the new files. This patch avoids most of the overhead by adding all library objects (and other rlib components) at once using a single `ar r`.
When building `librustc` (on Linux, using GNU ar), this patch gives a 60-80% reduction in linking time, from 90s to 10s one machine I tried and 25s to 8s on another. (Though `librustc` is a bit of a special case - it's a very large crate, so the rlib is large to begin with, and it also relies on a total of 45 static libraries due to the way LLVM is organized.) More reasonable crates such as `libstd` and `libcore` also get a small reduction in linking time (just from adding metadata, bitcode, and object code in one `ar` invocation instead of three), but this is not very noticeable since the time there is small to begin with (around 1s).
I think this is an improvement of the previous warning message, which
- like the comment that I removed implies - is in need of some
improvement.
I've opted to point the user in the right direction w.r.t how to fix the
problem, which I think is good form.
Not being familiar with the repr(...) attribute, I personally had to
check the lint rules myself to figure out what was wrong. Hopefully,
this will save he next person some time and headache.
Signed-off-by: Anton Lofgren <alofgren@op5.com>
the CFG for match statements.
There were two bugs in issue #14684. One was simply that the borrow
check didn't know about the correct CFG for match statements: the
pattern must be a predecessor of the guard. This disallows the bad
behavior if there are bindings in the pattern. But it isn't enough to
prevent the memory safety problem, because of wildcards; thus, this
patch introduces a more restrictive rule, which disallows assignments
and mutable borrows inside guards outright.
I discussed this with Niko and we decided this was the best plan of
action.
This breaks code that performs mutable borrows in pattern guards. Most
commonly, the code looks like this:
impl Foo {
fn f(&mut self, ...) {}
fn g(&mut self, ...) {
match bar {
Baz if self.f(...) => { ... }
_ => { ... }
}
}
}
Change this code to not use a guard. For example:
impl Foo {
fn f(&mut self, ...) {}
fn g(&mut self, ...) {
match bar {
Baz => {
if self.f(...) {
...
} else {
...
}
}
_ => { ... }
}
}
}
Sometimes this can result in code duplication, but often it illustrates
a hidden memory safety problem.
Closes#14684.
[breaking-change]
r? @pnkfelix
