This helper function was meant to reduce code duplication between
const-checking pre- and post-drop-elaboration. Most of the functionality
is only relevant for the pre-drop-elaboration pass.
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #76454 (UI to unit test for those using Cell/RefCell/UnsafeCell)
- #76474 (Add option to pass a custom codegen backend from a driver)
- #76711 (diag: improve closure/generic parameter mismatch)
- #77170 (Remove `#[rustc_allow_const_fn_ptr]` and add `#![feature(const_fn_fn_ptr_basics)]`)
- #77194 (Add doc alias for iterator fold)
- #77288 (fix building libstd for Miri on macOS)
- #77295 (Update unstable-book: Fix ABNF in inline assembly docs)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
Remove `#[rustc_allow_const_fn_ptr]` and add `#![feature(const_fn_fn_ptr_basics)]`
`rustc_allow_const_fn_ptr` was a hack to work around the lack of an escape hatch for the "min `const fn`" checks in const-stable functions. Now that we have co-opted `allow_internal_unstable` for this purpose, we no longer need a bespoke attribute.
Now this functionality is gated under `const_fn_fn_ptr_basics` (how concise!), and `#[allow_internal_unstable(const_fn_fn_ptr_basics)]` replaces `#[rustc_allow_const_fn_ptr]`. `const_fn_fn_ptr_basics` allows function pointer types to appear in the arguments and locals of a `const fn` as well as function pointer casts to be performed inside a `const fn`. Both of these were allowed in constants and statics already. Notably, this does **not** allow users to invoke function pointers in a const context. Presumably, we will use a nicer name for that (`const_fn_ptr`?).
r? @oli-obk
[mir-opt] Introduce a new flag to enable experimental/unsound mir opts
This implements part of https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/319. The exact name of this flag was not decided as part of that MCP and some people expressed that it should include "unsound" in some way.
I've chosen to use `enable-experimental-unsound-mir-opts` as the name. While long, I don't think that matters too much as really it will only be used by some mir-opt tests. If you object or have a better name, please leave a comment!
r? `@oli-obk`
cc `@rust-lang/wg-mir-opt` `@RalfJung`
Replace `discriminant_switch_effect` with more general version
#68528 added a new edge-specific effect for `SwitchInt` terminators, `discriminant_switch_effect`, to the dataflow framework. While this accomplished the short-term goal of making drop elaboration more precise, it wasn't really useful in other contexts: It only supported `SwitchInt`s on the discriminant of an `enum` and did not allow effects to be applied along the "otherwise" branch. In const-propagation, for example, arbitrary edge-specific effects for the targets of a `SwitchInt` can be used to remember the value a `match` scrutinee must have in each arm.
This PR replaces `discriminant_switch_effect` with a more general `switch_int_edge_effects` method. The new method has a slightly different interface from the other edge-specific effect methods (e.g. `call_return_effect`). This divergence is explained in the new method's documentation, and reading the changes to the various dataflow impls as well as `direction.rs` should further clarify things. This PR should not change behavior.
This was a hack to work around the lack of an escape hatch for the "min
`const fn`" checks in const-stable functions. Now that we have co-opted
`allow_internal_unstable` for this purpose, we no longer need the
bespoke attribute.
Check for missing const-stability attributes in `rustc_passes`
Currently, this happens as a side effect of `is_min_const_fn`, which is non-obvious. Also adds a test for this case, since we didn't seem to have one before.
Move helper function for `missing_const_for_fn` out of rustc to clippy
cc @rust-lang/clippy @ecstatic-morse #76618
r? @Manishearth
I also removed all support for suggesting a function could be `const fn` when that would require feature gates to actually work.
This means we'll now have to maintain this ourselves in clippy, but that's how most lints work anyway, so...
Enable const propagation into operands at mir_opt_level=2
Feature was added in #74507 but gated with `mir_opt_level>=3` because of compile time regressions. Let's see whether the LLVM 11 update solves that.
As the [perf results](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/77107#issuecomment-697668154) show, enabling this optimization results in a lot less regression as before.
cc @oli-obk
r? @ghost
Add `#![feature(const_fn_floating_point_arithmetic)]`
cc #76618
This is a template for splitting up `const_fn` into granular feature gates. I think this will make it easier, both for us and for users, to track stabilization of each individual feature. We don't *have* to do this, however. We could also keep stabilizing things out from under `const_fn`.
cc @rust-lang/wg-const-eval
r? @oli-obk
Rollup of 15 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #76932 (Relax promises about condition variable.)
- #76973 (Unstably allow assume intrinsic in const contexts)
- #77005 (BtreeMap: refactoring around edges)
- #77066 (Fix dest prop miscompilation around references)
- #77073 (dead_code: look at trait impls even if they don't contain items)
- #77086 (Include libunwind in the rust-src component.)
- #77097 (Make [].as_[mut_]ptr_range() (unstably) const.)
- #77106 (clarify that `changelog-seen = 1` goes to the beginning of config.toml)
- #77120 (Add `--keep-stage-std` to `x.py` for keeping only standard library artifacts)
- #77126 (Invalidate local LLVM cache less often)
- #77146 (Install std for non-host targets)
- #77155 (remove enum name from ImplSource variants)
- #77176 (Removing erroneous semicolon in transmute documentation)
- #77183 (Allow multiple allow_internal_unstable attributes)
- #77189 (Remove extra space from vec drawing)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
This refactors handling of `Rvalue::{Unary,Binary}Op` in the
const-checker. Now we `span_bug` if there's an unexpected type in a
primitive operation. This also allows unary negation on
`char` values through the const-checker because it makes the code a bit
cleaner. `char` does not actually support these operations, and if it
did, we could evaluate them at compile-time.
