The suggestion given by `FIXME` to use `CompilerMetadata` for
`download_toolchain` in `bootstrap::download` can result in more
confusion. This is because `stamp_key` is not always a date; it
can also be a commit hash. Additionally, unlike in `download_beta_toolchain`,
in the `download_ci_rustc` function, `version` and `commit` values
are calculated separately.
Signed-off-by: ozkanonur <work@onurozkan.dev>
Make sure the implementation of TcpStream::as_raw_fd is fully inlined
Currently the following function:
```rust
use std::os::fd::{AsRawFd, RawFd};
use std::net::TcpStream;
pub fn as_raw_fd(socket: &TcpStream) -> RawFd {
socket.as_raw_fd()
}
```
Is optimized to the following:
```asm
example::as_raw_fd:
push rax
call qword ptr [rip + <std::net::tcp::TcpStream as std::sys_common::AsInner<std::sys_common::net::TcpStream>>::as_inner@GOTPCREL]
mov rdi, rax
call qword ptr [rip + std::sys_common::net::TcpStream::socket@GOTPCREL]
mov rdi, rax
pop rax
jmp qword ptr [rip + _ZN73_$LT$std..sys..unix..net..Socket$u20$as$u20$std..os..fd..raw..AsRawFd$GT$9as_raw_fd17h633bcf7e481df8bbE@GOTPCREL]
```
I think it would make more sense to inline trivial functions used within `TcpStream::AsRawFd`.
Add `#[no_coverage]` to the test harness's `fn main`
There are two main motivations for adding `#[no_coverage]` to the test harness's entry point:
- The entry point is trivial compiler-generated code that doesn't correspond to user source, and it always runs, so there's no value in instrumenting it for coverage.
- Because it has dummy spans, it causes the instrumentor implementation to emit invalid coverage mappings that confuse `llvm-cov` and result in strange coverage reports.
Fixes#110749.
Leave promoteds untainted by errors when borrowck fails
Previously, when borrowck failed it would taint all promoteds within the MIR body. An attempt to evaluated the promoteds would subsequently fail with spurious "note: erroneous constant used". For example:
```console
...
note: erroneous constant used
--> tests/ui/borrowck/tainted-promoteds.rs:7:9
|
7 | a = &0 * &1 * &2 * &3;
| ^^
note: erroneous constant used
--> tests/ui/borrowck/tainted-promoteds.rs:7:14
|
7 | a = &0 * &1 * &2 * &3;
| ^^
note: erroneous constant used
--> tests/ui/borrowck/tainted-promoteds.rs:7:19
|
7 | a = &0 * &1 * &2 * &3;
| ^^
note: erroneous constant used
--> tests/ui/borrowck/tainted-promoteds.rs:7:24
|
7 | a = &0 * &1 * &2 * &3;
| ^^
```
Borrowck failure doesn't indicate that there is anything wrong with promoteds. Leave them untainted.
Fixes#110856.
update wasi_clock_time_api ref.
Closes#110809
>Preview0 corresponded to the import module name wasi_unstable. It was also called snapshot_0 in some places. It was short-lived, and the changes to preview1 were minor, so the focus here is on preview1.
we use the `preview1` doc according to the above quote form [WASI legacy Readme](https://github.com/WebAssembly/WASI/blob/main/legacy/README.md) .
Add 64-bit `time_t` support on 32-bit glibc Linux to `set_times`
Add support to `set_times` for 64-bit `time_t` on 32-bit glibc Linux platforms which have a 32-bit `time_t`. Split from #109773.
Tracking issue: #98245
std docs: edit `PathBuf::set_file_name` example
To make explicit that `set_file_name` might replace or remove the
extension, not just the file stem.
Also edit docs for `Path::with_file_name`, which calls `set_file_name`.
Some of these relations were already mentioned in the text, but that
Send is implemented for &mut impl Send was not mentioned,
neither did the docs list when &T is Sync.
Make `mem::replace` simpler in codegen
Since they'd mentioned more intrinsics for simplifying stuff recently,
r? `@WaffleLapkin`
This is a continuation of me looking at foundational stuff that ends up with more instructions than it really needs. Specifically I noticed this one because `Range::next` isn't MIR-inlining, and one of the largest parts of it is a `replace::<usize>` that's a good dozen instructions instead of the two it could be.
So this means that `ptr::write` with a `Copy` type no longer generates worse IR than manually dereferencing (well, at least in LLVM -- MIR still has bonus pointer casts), and in doing so means that we're finally down to just the two essential `memcpy`s when emitting `mem::replace` for a large type, rather than the bonus-`alloca` and three `memcpy`s we emitted before this ([or the 6 we currently emit in 1.69 stable](https://rust.godbolt.org/z/67W8on6nP)). That said, LLVM does _usually_ manage to optimize the extra code away. But it's still nice for it not to have to do as much, thanks to (for example) not going through an `alloca` when `replace`ing a primitive like a `usize`.
(This is a new intrinsic, but one that's immediately lowered to existing MIR constructs, so not anything that MIRI or the codegen backends or MIR semantics needs to do work to handle.)
My type ascription
Oh rip it out
Ah
If you think we live too much then
You can sacrifice diagnostics
Don't mix your garbage
Into my syntax
So many weird hacks keep diagnostics alive
Yet I don't even step outside
So many bad diagnostics keep tyasc alive
Yet tyasc doesn't even bother to survive!
Close parentheses for `offset_of` in AST pretty printing
HIR pretty printing already handles it correctly.
This will conflict with #110694 but it seems like that PR is gonna take bit more time.
Ping Nadrieril when changing exhaustiveness checking
Hi!
I don't know what the procedure is but I'd quite like to be pinged when people try to change the exhaustiveness code. It's a tricky piece of code and I'm the de facto expert on it; I'd like to be available to provide feedback to contributors who wish to change it. I occasionally look through the git history and open PRs but a triagebot ping would be much more convenient.
The message says "might have" because `check_match.rs` contains a little bit of exhaustiveness logic and a lot of other match-related checks, so this ping will have false positives.
Test precise capture with a multi-variant enum and exhaustive patterns
Add test checking that it is possible to capture fields of a multi-variant enum, when remaining variants are visibly uninhabited (under the `exhaustive_patterns` feature gate).
Remove wrong assertion in match checking.
This assertions is completely misguided, introduced by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/108504. The responsible PR is on beta, nominating for backport.
Instead of checking that this is not a `&&`, it would make sense to check that neither arms of that `&&` is a `let`. This seems like a lot of code for unclear benefit.
r? `@saethlin`
Tweak await span to not contain dot
Fixes a discrepancy between method calls and await expressions where the latter are desugared to have a span that *contains* the dot (i.e. `.await`) but method call identifiers don't contain the dot. This leads to weird suggestions suggestions in borrowck -- see linked issue.
Fixes#110761
This mostly touches a bunch of tests to tighten their `await` span.
Previously, when borrowck failed it would taint all promoteds within the MIR
body. An attempt to evaluated the promoteds would subsequently fail with
spurious "note: erroneous constant used". For example:
```console
...
note: erroneous constant used
--> tests/ui/borrowck/tainted-promoteds.rs:7:9
|
7 | a = &0 * &1 * &2 * &3;
| ^^
note: erroneous constant used
--> tests/ui/borrowck/tainted-promoteds.rs:7:14
|
7 | a = &0 * &1 * &2 * &3;
| ^^
note: erroneous constant used
--> tests/ui/borrowck/tainted-promoteds.rs:7:19
|
7 | a = &0 * &1 * &2 * &3;
| ^^
note: erroneous constant used
--> tests/ui/borrowck/tainted-promoteds.rs:7:24
|
7 | a = &0 * &1 * &2 * &3;
| ^^
```
Borrowck failure doesn't indicate that there is anything wrong with
promoteds. Leave them untainted.
