This is an alternative to upgrading the way rvalues are handled in the
borrow check. Making rvalues handled more like lvalues in the borrow
check caused numerous problems related to double mutable borrows and
rvalue scopes. Rather than come up with more borrow check rules to try
to solve these problems, I decided to just forbid pattern bindings after
`@`. This affected fewer than 10 lines of code in the compiler and
libraries.
This breaks code like:
match x {
y @ z => { ... }
}
match a {
b @ Some(c) => { ... }
}
Change this code to use nested `match` or `let` expressions. For
example:
match x {
y => {
let z = y;
...
}
}
match a {
Some(c) => {
let b = Some(c);
...
}
}
Closes#14587.
[breaking-change]
Not included are two required patches:
* LLVM: segmented stack support for DragonFly [1]
* jemalloc: simple configure patches
[1]: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4705
Not included are two required patches:
* LLVM: segmented stack support for DragonFly [1]
* jemalloc: simple configure patches
[1]: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4705
This is super, super WIP, but I'm going to go get lunch for a while, and figured I'd toss my work up here in case anyone wants to see my work as I do it.
This contains a new introductory section explaining the basics of pointers, and some pitfalls that Rust attempts to solve. I'd be interested in hearing how my explanation is, as well as if this belongs here. Pointers are such a crucial concept, I don't mind having a beginners' section on them in the main docs, even though our main audience is supposed to understand them already. Reasonable people may disagree, however.
The translation is based on an early version of tutorial.md, thus most
of entries have been marked as fuzzy and actually they are incorrect.
Now tutorial.md is planed to be replaced with guide.md, so I'd suggest
removing translation files for a while.
/cc @gifnksm
The translation is based on an early version of tutorial.md, thus most
of entries have been marked as fuzzy and actually they are incorrect.
Now tutorial.md is planed to be replaced with guide.md, so I'd suggest
removing translation files for a while.
Signed-off-by: OGINO Masanori <masanori.ogino@gmail.com>
This eliminates the last vestige of the `~` syntax.
Instead of `~self`, write `self: Box<TypeOfSelf>`; instead of `mut
~self`, write `mut self: Box<TypeOfSelf>`, replacing `TypeOfSelf` with
the self-type parameter as specified in the implementation.
Closes#13885.
[breaking-change]
We now build the game at the end of the first section.
I wanted to do it as we went along, but it's too hard with these fundamentals
not in place. The rest will do the 'as we go' approach, but I think this is
better.
Simplify example in 5.2 to remove hidden `#[deriving(Show)]`. Traits haven't been introduced yet and now it's easier to just type in the code and expect it to work. Add in some examples for constructing the enum types. Explicitly expose `#![feature(struct_variant)]` in the code to make it more transparent, this bit me when I worked through the tutorial.
Add references in chapter 8 to later chapters describing `Rc`, `Gc` and `Send`. This is a simple fix for #15293.
Simplify vector indexing example in chapter 13 and removed hidden, unnecessary, code. Gave an example usage of the derived `Rand` trait in chapter 17.
Removed references to removed 'extra' crate.
Three small changes:
1. Re-organize headers in the Strings guide so they show up correctly.
2. build the strings guide with the other docs
3. include the strings guide in the list of guides
except where trait objects are involved.
Part of issue #15349, though I'm leaving it open for trait objects.
Cross borrowing for trait objects remains because it is needed until we
have DST.
This will break code like:
fn foo(x: &int) { ... }
let a = box 3i;
foo(a);
Change this code to:
fn foo(x: &int) { ... }
let a = box 3i;
foo(&*a);
[breaking-change]
5.2 Simplify example to remove hidden #[deriving(Show)].
Add example for constructing the enums.
8 Reference later sections describing rc, gc and send.
Fix for #15293.
13 Simplify BananaMania example to remove hidden code.
17 Gave an example using the derived Rand trait.
Removed references to removed 'extra' crate.
- Treat WOFF as binary files so that git does not perform newline normalization.
- Replace corrupt Heuristica files with Source Serif Pro — italics are [almost in production](https://github.com/adobe/source-serif-pro/issues/2) so I left Heuristica Italic which makes a good pair with SSP. Overall, Source Serif Pro is I think a better fit for rustdoc (cc @TheHydroImpulse). This ought to fix#15527.
- Store Source Code Pro locally in order to make offline docs freestanding. Fixes#14778.
Preview: http://adrientetar.legtux.org/cached/rust-docs/core.html
r? @alexcrichton
I'm leaving off `rustdoc` usage because it won't work unless this is a `pub fn`, and I want to talk about public/private in the context of modules. I'm also not mentioning `//!` because it is exclusively used to provide the overview of a module.
Here's the issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/15333
Tested it. It works. FYI, in case anyone doesn't know: keyboard shortcut `'` restricts text search to only links on Firefox allowing this to be checked easily.
One of the examples in the docs on adding documentation to rust code has an error that will cause the function to run endlessly rather than return the desired result, should someone actually implement this for some reason. While the error does not hinder the explanation of documenting code, it does look better if it is corrected.
* channel() - #[unstable]. This will likely remain forever
* sync_channel(n: int) - #[unstable with comment]. Concerns have ben raised
about the usage of the term "synchronous channel" because that generally only
applies to the case where n == 0. If n > 0 then these channels are often
referred to as buffered channels.
* Sender::send(), SyncSender::send(), Receiver::recv() - #[experimental]. These
functions directly violate the general guideline of not providing a failing
and non-failing variant. These functions were explicitly selected for being
excused from this guideline, but recent discussions have cast doubt on that
decision. These functions are #[experimental] for now until a decision is made
as they are candidates for removal.
* Sender::send_opt(), SyncSender::send_opt(), Receiver::recv_opt() - #[unstable
with a comment]. If the above no-`_opt` functions are removed, these functions
will be renamed to the non-`_opt` variants.
* SyncSender::try_send(), Receiver::try_recv() - #[unstable with a comment].
These return types of these functions to not follow general conventions. They
are consistent with the rest of the api, but not with the rest of the
libraries. Until their return types are nailed down, these functions are
#[unstable].
* Receiver::iter() - #[unstable]. This will likely remain forever.
* std::com::select - #[experimental]. The functionality is likely to remain in
some form forever, but it is highly unlikely to remain in its current form. It
is unknown how much breakage this will cause if and when the api is
redesigned, so the entire module and its components are all experimental.
* DuplexStream - #[deprecated]. This type is not composable with other channels
in terms of selection or other expected locations. It can also not be used
with ChanWriter and ChanReader, for example. Due to it being only lightly
used, and easily replaced with two channels, this type is being deprecated and
slated for removal.
* Clone for {,Sync}Sender - #[unstable]. This will likely remain forever.
* channel() - #[unstable]. This will likely remain forever
* sync_channel(n: int) - #[unstable with comment]. Concerns have ben raised
about the usage of the term "synchronous channel" because that generally only
applies to the case where n == 0. If n > 0 then these channels are often
referred to as buffered channels.
* Sender::send(), SyncSender::send(), Receiver::recv() - #[experimental]. These
functions directly violate the general guideline of not providing a failing
and non-failing variant. These functions were explicitly selected for being
excused from this guideline, but recent discussions have cast doubt on that
decision. These functions are #[experimental] for now until a decision is made
as they are candidates for removal.
* Sender::send_opt(), SyncSender::send_opt(), Receiver::recv_opt() - #[unstable
with a comment]. If the above no-`_opt` functions are removed, these functions
will be renamed to the non-`_opt` variants.
* SyncSender::try_send(), Receiver::try_recv() - #[unstable with a comment].
These return types of these functions to not follow general conventions. They
are consistent with the rest of the api, but not with the rest of the
libraries. Until their return types are nailed down, these functions are
#[unstable].
* Receiver::iter() - #[unstable]. This will likely remain forever.
* std::com::select - #[experimental]. The functionality is likely to remain in
some form forever, but it is highly unlikely to remain in its current form. It
is unknown how much breakage this will cause if and when the api is
redesigned, so the entire module and its components are all experimental.
* DuplexStream - #[deprecated]. This type is not composable with other channels
in terms of selection or other expected locations. It can also not be used
with ChanWriter and ChanReader, for example. Due to it being only lightly
used, and easily replaced with two channels, this type is being deprecated and
slated for removal.
* Clone for {,Sync}Sender - #[unstable]. This will likely remain forever.
Whew. So much here! Feedback very welcome.
This is the first part where we actually start learning things. I'd like to think I struck a good balance of explaining enough details, without getting too bogged down, and without being confusing... but of course I'd think that. 😉
As I mention in the commit comment, We probably want to move the guessing game to the rust-lang org, rather than just having it on my GitHub. Or, I could put the code inline. I think it'd be neat to have it as a project, so people can pull it down with Cargo. Until we make that decision, I'll just leave this here.
Whew! Who knew there was so much to say about variables.
We probably want to move the guessing game to the rust-lang org, rather than
just having it on my GitHub. Or, I could put the code inline. I think it'd be
neat to have it as a project, so people can pull it down with Cargo. Until we
make that decision, I'll just leave this here.
I'm going to move testing to be right AFTER the guessing game. I wanted it
to be borderline TDD, but I think that, since the first example is just one
file, it might be a bit overkill.
I'm doing this in its own commit to hopefully avoid merge conflicts.
./hello_world is not recognized on Windows.
We can type either hello_world or hello_world.exe to run the executable. I chose "hello_world.exe", which seems more conventional on Windows.
This makes the `in-header`, `markdown-before-content`, and `markdown-after-content` options available to `rustdoc` when generating documentation for any crate.
Before, these options were only available when creating documentation *from* markdown. Now, they are available when generating documentation from source.
This also updates the `rustdoc -h` output to reflect these changes. It does not update the `man rustdoc` page, nor does it update the documentation in [the `rustdoc` manual](http://doc.rust-lang.org/rustdoc.html).
floating point numbers for real.
This will break code that looks like:
let mut x = 0;
while ... {
x += 1;
}
println!("{}", x);
Change that code to:
let mut x = 0i;
while ... {
x += 1;
}
println!("{}", x);
Closes#15201.
[breaking-change]
This change registers new snapshots, allowing `*T` to be removed from the language. This is a large breaking change, and it is recommended that if compiler errors are seen that any FFI calls are audited to determine whether they should be actually taking `*mut T`.
