[6/n] rustc: transition HIR function bodies from Block to Expr.
_This is part of a series ([prev](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/37408) | [next](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/37676)) of patches designed to rework rustc into an out-of-order on-demand pipeline model for both better feature support (e.g. [MIR-based](https://github.com/solson/miri) early constant evaluation) and incremental execution of compiler passes (e.g. type-checking), with beneficial consequences to IDE support as well.
If any motivation is unclear, please ask for additional PR description clarifications or code comments._
<hr>
The main change here is that functions and closures both use `Expr` instead of `Block` for their bodies.
For closures this actually allows a honest representation of brace-less closure bodies, e.g. `|x| x + 1` is now distinguishable from `|x| { x + 1 }`, therefore this PR is `[syntax-breaking]` (cc @Manishearth).
Using `Expr` allows more logic to be shared between constant bodies and function bodies, with some small such changes already part of this PR, and eventually easing #35078 and per-body type tables.
Incidentally, there used to be some corners cut here and there and as such I had to (re)write divergence tracking for type-checking so that it is capable of understanding basic structured control-flow:
``` rust
fn a(x: bool) -> i32 {
// match also works (as long as all arms diverge)
if x { panic!("true") } else { return 1; }
0 // "unreachable expression" after this PR
}
```
And since liveness' "not all control paths return a value" moved to type-checking we can have nice things:
``` rust
// before & after:
fn b() -> i32 { 0; } // help: consider removing this semicolon
// only after this PR
fn c() -> i32 { { 0; } } // help: consider removing this semicolon
fn d() { let x: i32 = { 0; }; } // help: consider removing this semicolon
fn e() { f({ 0; }); } // help: consider removing this semicolon
```
macros 1.1: Allow proc_macro functions to declare attributes to be mark as used
This PR allows proc macro functions to declare attribute names that should be marked as used when attached to the deriving item. There are a few questions for this PR.
- Currently this uses a separate attribute named `#[proc_macro_attributes(..)]`, is this the best choice?
- In order to make this work, the `check_attribute` function had to be modified to not error on attributes marked as used. This is a pretty large change in semantics, is there a better way to do this?
- I've got a few clones where I don't know if I need them (like turning `item` into a `TokenStream`), can these be avoided?
- Is switching to `MultiItemDecorator` the right thing here?
Also fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/37563.
Replace FNV with a faster hash function.
Hash table lookups are very hot in rustc profiles and the time taken within `FnvHash` itself is a big part of that. Although FNV is a simple hash, it processes its input one byte at a time. In contrast, Firefox has a homespun hash function that is also simple but works on multiple bytes at a time. So I tried it out and the results are compelling:
```
futures-rs-test 4.326s vs 4.212s --> 1.027x faster (variance: 1.001x, 1.007x)
helloworld 0.233s vs 0.232s --> 1.004x faster (variance: 1.037x, 1.016x)
html5ever-2016- 5.397s vs 5.210s --> 1.036x faster (variance: 1.009x, 1.006x)
hyper.0.5.0 5.018s vs 4.905s --> 1.023x faster (variance: 1.007x, 1.006x)
inflate-0.1.0 4.889s vs 4.872s --> 1.004x faster (variance: 1.012x, 1.007x)
issue-32062-equ 0.347s vs 0.335s --> 1.035x faster (variance: 1.033x, 1.019x)
issue-32278-big 1.717s vs 1.622s --> 1.059x faster (variance: 1.027x, 1.028x)
jld-day15-parse 1.537s vs 1.459s --> 1.054x faster (variance: 1.005x, 1.003x)
piston-image-0. 11.863s vs 11.482s --> 1.033x faster (variance: 1.060x, 1.002x)
regex.0.1.30 2.517s vs 2.453s --> 1.026x faster (variance: 1.011x, 1.013x)
rust-encoding-0 2.080s vs 2.047s --> 1.016x faster (variance: 1.005x, 1.005x)
syntex-0.42.2 32.268s vs 31.275s --> 1.032x faster (variance: 1.014x, 1.022x)
syntex-0.42.2-i 17.629s vs 16.559s --> 1.065x faster (variance: 1.013x, 1.021x)
```
(That's a stage1 compiler doing debug builds. Results for a stage2 compiler are similar.)
The attached commit is not in a state suitable for landing because I changed the implementation of FnvHasher without changing its name (because that would have required touching many lines in the compiler). Nonetheless, it is a good place to start discussions.
Profiles show very clearly that this new hash function is a lot faster to compute than FNV. The quality of the new hash function is less clear -- it seems to do better in some cases and worse in others (judging by the number of instructions executed in `Hash{Map,Set}::get`).
CC @brson, @arthurprs
Stabilize `..` in tuple (struct) patterns
I'd like to nominate `..` in tuple and tuple struct patterns for stabilization.
This feature is a relatively small extension to existing stable functionality and doesn't have known blockers.
The feature first appeared in Rust 1.10 6 months ago.
An example of use: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/36203
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/33627
r? @nikomatsakis
KNOWN_ATTRIBUTES should really be named BUILT_ATTRIBUTES,
while KNOWN_ATTRIBUTES should be used to mark attributes
as known, similar to USED_ATTRIBUTES.
[5/n] rustc: record the target type of every adjustment.
_This is part of a series ([prev](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/37404) | [next](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/37412)) of patches designed to rework rustc into an out-of-order on-demand pipeline model for both better feature support (e.g. [MIR-based](https://github.com/solson/miri) early constant evaluation) and incremental execution of compiler passes (e.g. type-checking), with beneficial consequences to IDE support as well.
If any motivation is unclear, please ask for additional PR description clarifications or code comments._
<hr>
The first commit rearranges `tcx.tables` so that all users go through `tcx.tables()`. This in preparation for per-body `Tables` where they will be requested for a specific `DefId`. Included to minimize churn.
The rest of the changes focus on adjustments, there are some renamings, but the main addition is the target type, always available in all cases (as opposed to just for unsizing where it was previously needed).
Possibly the most significant effect of this change is that figuring out the final type of an expression is now _always_ just one successful `HashMap` lookup (either the adjustment or, if that doesn't exist, the node type).
detect extra region requirements in impls
The current "compare method" check fails to check for the "region obligations" that accrue in the fulfillment context. This branch switches that code to create a `FnCtxt` so that it can invoke the regionck code. Previous crater runs (I haven't done one with the latest tip) have found some small number of affected crates, so I went ahead and introduced a warning cycle. I will kick off a crater run with this branch shortly.
This is a [breaking-change] because previously unsound code was accepted. The crater runs also revealed some cases where legitimate code was no longer type-checking, so the branch contains one additional (but orthogonal) change. It improves the elaborator so that we elaborate region requirements more thoroughly. In particular, if we know that `&'a T: 'b`, we now deduce that `T: 'b` and `'a: 'b`.
I invested a certain amount of effort in getting a good error message. The error message looks like this:
```
error[E0276]: impl has stricter requirements than trait
--> traits-elaborate-projection-region.rs:33:5
|
21 | fn foo() where T: 'a;
| --------------------- definition of `foo` from trait
...
33 | fn foo() where U: 'a { }
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ impl has extra requirement `U: 'a`
|
= warning: this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release!
= note: for more information, see issue #18937 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/18937>
note: lint level defined here
--> traits-elaborate-projection-region.rs:12:9
|
12 | #![deny(extra_requirement_in_impl)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
```
Obviously the warning only prints if this is a _new_ error (that resulted from the bugfix). But all existing errors that fit this description are updated to follow the general template. In order to get the lint to preserve the span-labels and the error code, I separate out the core `Diagnostic` type (which encapsulates the error code, message, span, and children) from the `DiagnosticBuilder` (which layers on a `Handler` that can be used to report errors). I also extended `add_lint` with an alternative `add_lint_diagnostic` that takes in a full diagnostic (cc @jonathandturner for those changes). This doesn't feel ideal but feels like it's moving in the right direction =).
r? @pnkfelix
cc @arielb1
Fixes#18937
Make sufficiently old or low-impact compatibility lints deny-by-default
Tracking issues are updated/created when necessary.
Needs crater run before proceeding.
r? @nikomatsakis
Cache projections in trans
This introduces a cache for the results of projection and normalization in trans. This is in addition to the existing cache that is per-inference-context. Trans is an easy place to put the cache because we are guaranteed not to have type parameters and also we don't expect any failures or inference variables, so there is no need to cache or follow-up on obligations that come along with. (As evidenced by the fact that this particular code would panic if any error occurred.)
That said, I am not sure this is 100% the best place for it; I sort of wanted a cache like we have in the fulfillment context for global names; but that cache only triggers when all subsequent obligations are satisfied, and since projections don't have an entry in the obligation jungle there is no easy place to put it. I considered caching both the result and obligations globally, but haven't really tried implementing it. It might be a good next step.
Regardless, this cache seems to have no real effect on bootstrap time (maybe a slight improvement), but on [the futures.rs test case I was looking at](https://github.com/rust-lang-nursery/rustc-benchmarks/pull/6), it improves performance quite a bit:
| phase | before | after |
| ----- | ------ | ----- |
| collection | 0.79s | 0.46s |
| translation | 6.8s | 3.2s |
| total | 11.92s | 7.15s |
r? @arielb1
