Lint on invalid usage of `UnsafeCell::raw_get` in reference casting
This PR proposes to take into account `UnsafeCell::raw_get` method call for non-Freeze types for the `invalid_reference_casting` lint.
The goal of this is to catch those kind of invalid reference casting:
```rust
fn as_mut<T>(x: &T) -> &mut T {
unsafe { &mut *std::cell::UnsafeCell::raw_get(x as *const _ as *const _) }
//~^ ERROR casting `&T` to `&mut T` is undefined behavior
}
```
r? `@est31`
Update stdarch submodule and remove special handling in cranelift codegen for some AVX and SSE2 LLVM intrinsics
https://github.com/rust-lang/stdarch/pull/1463 reimplemented some x86 intrinsics to avoid using some x86-specific LLVM intrinsics:
* Store unaligned (`_mm*_storeu_*`) use `<*mut _>::write_unaligned` instead of `llvm.x86.*.storeu.*`.
* Shift by immediate (`_mm*_s{ll,rl,ra}i_epi*`) use `if` (srl, sll) or `min` (sra) to simulate the behaviour when the RHS is out of range. RHS is constant, so the `if`/`min` will be optimized away.
This PR updates the stdarch submodule to pull these changes and removes special handling for those LLVM intrinsics from cranelift codegen. I left gcc codegen untouched because there are some autogenerated lists.
Fix log formatting in bootstrap
`format!()` was missing, so log was just showing `{target}` verbatim.
(I also applied a small clippy suggestion in `builder.info()`)
fix#115348fix#115348
It looks that:
- In `rustc_mir_build::build`, the body of function will not be built, when the `tcx.check_match(def)` fails due to `non-exhaustive patterns`
- In `rustc_mir_transform::check_unsafety`, the `UnsafetyChecker` collects all `used_unsafe_blocks` in the MIR of a function, and the `UnusedUnsafeVisitor` will visit all `UnsafeBlock`s in the HIR and collect `unused_unsafes`, which are not contained in `used_unsafe_blocks`, and report `unnecessary_unsafe`s
- So the unsafe block in the issue example code will be reported as `unnecessary_unsafe`.
Replace `rustc_data_structures` dependency with `rustc_index` in `rustc_parse_format`
`rustc_data_structures` is only used for the `static_assert_size` macro, yet that is defined in `rustc_index` and merely re-exported. `rustc_index` is a lot more lightweight than `rustc_data_structures` which would make this a lot more reusable for rust-analyzer.
Add explanatory note to 'expected item' error
Fixes#113110
It changes the diagnostic from this:
```
error: expected item, found `5`
--> ../test.rs:1:1
|
1 | 5
| ^ expected item
```
to this:
```
error: expected item, found `5`
--> ../test.rs:1:1
|
1 | 5
| ^ expected item
|
= note: items are things that can appear at the root of a module
= note: for a full list see https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/items.html
```
Represent MIR composite debuginfo as projections instead of aggregates
Composite debuginfo for MIR is currently represented as
```
debug name => Type { projection1 => place1, projection2 => place2 };
```
ie. a single `VarDebugInfo` object with that name, and its value a `VarDebugInfoContents::Composite`.
This PR proposes to reverse the representation to be
```
debug name.projection1 => place1;
debug name.projection2 => place2;
```
ie. multiple `VarDebugInfo` objects with each their projection.
This simplifies the handling of composite debuginfo by the compiler by avoiding weird nesting.
Based on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/115139
Add `FreezeLock` type and use it to store `Definitions`
This adds a `FreezeLock` type which allows mutation using a lock until the value is frozen where it can be accessed lock-free. It's used to store `Definitions` in `Untracked` instead of a `RwLock`. Unlike the current scheme of leaking read guards this doesn't deadlock if definitions is written to after no mutation are expected.
Implement SMIR generic parameter instantiation
Also demonstrates the use of it with a test.
This required a few smaller changes that may conflict with `@ericmarkmartin` work, but should be easy to resolve any conflicts on my end if their stuff lands first.
It uses `once` chained with `(0..self.num_calls).map(...)` followed by
`.take(self.num_calls`. I found this hard to read. It's simpler to just
use `repeat_with`.
