[`never_loop`]: Fix FP with let..else statements.
Fixes#9356
This has been bugging me for a while, so I thought I'd take a stab at it! I'm completely uncertain about the quality of my code, but I think it's an alright start, so opening this PR to get some feedback from more experienced clippy people :)
changelog: [`never_loop`]: Fix FP with let..else statements
Fixes#9504
Compiler generated call `into_iter` nodes return empty substs
which we need when checking it's predicates. Handle this by
simply exitting when we encounter one. This change introduces
false negatives in place of the ICEs.
[arithmetic-side-effects] Finish non-overflowing ops
Extends https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/9474 to also take into consideration "raw" binary operations. For example, `let a = b / 2` and `let a = 1 * b` won't trigger the lint.
changelog: [arithmetic-side-effects] Finish non-overflowing ops
Make module-style lints resilient to --remap-path-prefix
changelog: [`self_named_module_files`], [`mod_module_files`]: Make module-style lints resilient to `--remap-path-prefix`
Without this if a user has configured `--remap-path-prefix` to be used for a prefix containing the current source directory the lints would silently fail to generate a warning.
Migrate write.rs to a late pass
changelog: Migrates write.rs from a pre expansion pass to a late pass
changelog: [`positional_named_format_parameters`] is renamed in favour of the rustc lint `named_arguments_used_positionally`
- Macros are now identified by diagnostic items, so will no longer lint user defined macros named, e.g. a custom `print!`
- `print_literal`/`write_literal` no longer lint no longer lint literals that come from macro expansions, e.g. `env!("FOO")`
- `print_with_newline`/`write_with_newline` no longer lint strings with any internal `\r` or `\n`s
~~A false negative, `print_literal`/`write_literal` don't lint format strings that produce `FormatSpec`s, e.g. ones containing pretty print/width/align specifiers~~
Suggestion changes:
- ~~`print_literal`/`write_literal` no longer have suggestions, as the spans for the `{}`s were not easily obtainable~~
- `print_with_newline`/`write_with_newline` has a better suggestion for a sole literal newline, but no longer has suggestions for len > 1 strings that end in a literal newline
- ~~`use_debug` spans are less precise, now point to the whole format string~~
The diff for write.rs is pretty unwieldy, other than for the `declare_clippy_lint!`s I think you'd be better off viewing it as a brand new file rather than looking at the diff, as it's mostly written from scratch
cc #6610, fixes#5721, fixes#7195, fixes#8615
Fix `unused_peekable` closure and `f(&mut peekable)` false positives
changelog: Fix [`unused_peekable`] false positive when peeked in a closure or called as `f(&mut peekable)`
The `return`/`break` changes aren't part of the fix, they allow an earlier return in some cases. `break` is replaced with `return` for style purposes as they do the same thing in this case
Fixes#9456Fixes#9462
Don't panic on invalid shift while constfolding
Instead of panicking on invalid shifts while folding constants we simply give up. Fixes#9463
Notice the "attempt to shift right by `1316134912_u32`", which seems weird. AFAICS it comes from rustc itself.
changelog: none
Don't lint `large_stack_array` inside static items
We now check if the linted `Expr` is inside an `ItemKind::Static`, which can't take the suggested `Box<[...]`. I _think_ this is the correct fix for #9460
I removed `if_chain` while I was at it.
changelog: Don't lint `large_stack_array` inside static items
Use macro callsite when creating `Sugg` helper
Closes#9375
changelog: Improvement: [`collapsible_if`]: Suggestions now work with macros, by taking the call site into account.
Replace u128 with u64 in large_enum_variant uitest
A u128 has [an 8 byte alignment on x86](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/54341), but a 16 byte alignment on aarch64 which changes the size of the enums due to extra padding. This means the test fails on aarch64
changelog: none
Fix `range_{plus,minus}_one` bad suggestions
Fixes#9431.
The current `range_plus_one` and `range_minus_one` suggestions are completely incorrect when macros are involved.
This commit resolves this by disabling the lints for any range expression that is expanded from a macro. The reasons for this are that it is very difficult to create a correct suggestion in this case and that false negatives are less important for pedantic lints.
changelog: Fix `range_{plus,minus}_one` bad suggestions
Fixes#9431.
The current `range_plus_one` and `range_minus_one` suggestions
are completely incorrect when macros are involved.
This commit resolves this by disabling the lints for any range
expression that is expanded from a macro. The reasons for this
are that it is very difficult to create a correct suggestion in
this case and that false negatives are less important for
pedantic lints.
[Arithmetic] Consider literals
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/9307 and makes the `arithmetic` lint behave like `integer_arithmetic`.
It is worth noting that literal integers of a binary operation (`1 + 1`, `i32::MAX + 1`), **regardless if they are in a constant environment**, won't trigger the lint. Assign operations also have similar reasoning.
changelog: Consider literals in the arithmetic lint
Suggest `unwrap_or_default` when closure returns `"".to_string`
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/9420
changelog: [`unwrap_or_else_default`]: suggest `unwrap_or_default()` instead of `unwrap_or_else` with a closure that returns an empty `to_string`.
