Refactor layout to store offsets of fields, not offsets after fields
This is the next PR moving us towards being able to reorder struct fields.
The old code implicitly stored the offset of the first field. This is inadequate because the first field may no longer be offset 0 in future. This PR refactors `layout` to use a `offsets` vector instead of a `offset_after_field` vector.
this commit adds 4 new target definitions to the compiler for easier
cross compilation to ARM Cortex-M devices.
- `thumbv6m-none-eabi`
- For the Cortex-M0, Cortex-M0+ and Cortex-M1
- This architecture doesn't have hardware support (instructions) for
atomics. Hence, the `Atomic*` structs are not available for this
target.
- `thumbv7m-none-eabi`
- For the Cortex-M3
- `thumbv7em-none-eabi`
- For the FPU-less variants of the Cortex-M4 and Cortex-M7
- On this target, all the floating point operations will be lowered
software routines (intrinsics)
- `thumbv7em-none-eabihf`
- For the variants of the Cortex-M4 and Cortex-M7 that do have a FPU.
- On this target, all the floating point operations will be lowered
to hardware instructions
No binary releases of standard crates, like `core`, are planned for
these targets because Cargo, in the future, will compile e.g. the `core`
crate on the fly as part of the `cargo build` process. In the meantime,
you'll have to compile the `core` crate yourself. [Xargo] is the easiest
way to do that as in handles the compilation of `core` automatically and
can be used just like Cargo: `xargo build --target thumbv6m-none-eabi`
is all that's needed.
[Xargo]: https://crates.io/crates/xargo
Documentation change to macros.rs for `includes!`
I'm not sure if this documentation is clear or extensive enough, but this is just to get started on the problem, fixes issue #36387.
This commit makes the return type of AstBuilder.stmt_let_typed match the return type of other AstBuilder.stmt* functions. This avoids unnecessary boxing/unboxing whenever Stmt's are stored in a Vec, which is the default use case.nnThis is a potentially plugin breaking change.
Fix RUSTC_VERSION for 'documenting' build stage.
Previously the `env!("RUSTC_VERSION")` requirement would break the "Documenting rustc_metadata" stage of the rustc build, since that environment variable is only defined during the main build.
r? @eddyb
Working asmjs and wasm targets
This patch set results in a working standard library for the asmjs-unknown-emscripten and wasm32-unknown-emscripten targets. It is based on the work of @badboy and @rschulman.
It does a few things:
- Updates LLVM with the emscripten [fastcomp](https://github.com/rust-lang/llvm/pull/50) patches, which include the pnacl IR legalizer and the asm.js backend. This patch is thought not to have any significant effect on existing targets.
- Teaches rustbuild to correctly link C code with emscripten
- Updates gcc-rs to work correctly with emscripten
- Teaches rustbuild to run crate tests for emscripten with node
- Modifies Thread::new to return an error on emscripten, to facilitate debugging a common failure mode
- Modifies libtest to run in single-threaded mode for emscripten
- Ignores a host of tests that don't work yet, mostly dealing with threads and I/O
- Updates libc with wasm32 definitions (presently the same as asmjs)
- Adds a wasm32-unknown-emscripten target that feeds the output of LLVM's asmjs backend through emcc to generate wasm
Notes and caveats:
- This is only known to work with `--enable-rustbuild`.
- The wasm32 target can't be tested correctly yet because of issues in compiletest and limitations in node https://github.com/kripken/emscripten/issues/4542, but hello.rs does seem to work when run on node via the binaryen interpreter
- This requires an up to date installation of the emscripten sdk from its incoming branch
- Unwinding is very broken
- When enabling the emscripten targets jemalloc is disabled for all targets, which results in test failures for the host
Next steps are to fix the jemalloc issue, start building the two emscripten targets on the auto builders, then start producing nightlies.
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/36317 tracks work on this.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/36515
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/36515
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/36356
rustc: More fixes for arch-independent hashing
In another attempt to fix#36793 this commit attempts to head off any future
problems by adding a custom `WidentUsizeHasher` which will widen any hashing of
`isize` and `usize` to a `u64` as necessary. This obviates the need for a
previous number of `as u64` annotations and will hopefully protect us against
future problems here.
Closes#36793 (hopefully)
Previously the `env!("RUSTC_VERSION")` requirement would break the
"Documenting rustc_metadata" stage of the rustc build, since that
environment variable is only defined during the main build.
In another attempt to fix#36793 this commit attempts to head off any future
problems by adding a custom `WidentUsizeHasher` which will widen any hashing of
`isize` and `usize` to a `u64` as necessary. This obviates the need for a
previous number of `as u64` annotations and will hopefully protect us against
future problems here.
Closes#36793 (hopefully)
This is a hack to support building targets that don't support jemalloc
alongside hosts that do. The jemalloc build is controlled by a feature
of the std crate, and if that feature changes between targets, it
invalidates the fingerprint of std's build script (this is a cargo
bug); so we must ensure that the feature set used by std is the same
across all targets, which means we have to build the alloc_jemalloc
crate for targets like emscripten, even if we don't use it.
