This removes an existing generic param from the `GenericParamList`. It
also considers to remove the extra colon & whitespace to the previous
sibling.
* change order to get all param types first and mark them as mutable
before the first edit happens
* add helper function to remove a generic parameter
* fix test output
This adds a new assist named "replace named generic with impl" to move
the generic param type from the generic param list into the function
signature.
```rust
fn new<T: ToString>(input: T) -> Self {}
```
becomes
```rust
fn new(input: impl ToString) -> Self {}
```
The first step is to determine if the assist can be applied, there has
to be a match between generic trait param & function paramter types.
* replace function parameter type(s) with impl
* add new `impl_trait_type` function to generate the new trait bounds with `impl` keyword for use in the
function signature
fix: don't try determining type of token inside macro calls
When we're requested `Go to Type Definition`, we first downmap the token in question to tokens in every macro call expansion involved, and then determine the type of those mapped tokens by looking for the nearest ancestor node that is either expression or pattern (or a few others). This procedure has one flaw: When the downmapped token is inside another macro call, the nearest ancestor node to retrieve the type of is *that* macro call. That's not what we should return in general and therefore we should disregard it.
Notably, now that we expand built-in `format_arg!` and its family macros, we're always returning [`Arguments`] when one `Go to Type Definition` at `dbg!(variable$0)` along with the actual type of `variable` without this patch.
[`Arguments`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/core/fmt/struct.Arguments.html
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #111384 (Fix linking Mac Catalyst by including LC_BUILD_VERSION in object files)
- #111899 (CGU cleanups)
- #111940 (Clarify safety concern of `io::Read::read` is only relevant in unsafe code)
- #111947 (Add test for RPIT defined with different hidden types with different substs)
- #111951 (Correct comment on privately uninhabited pattern.)
Failed merges:
- #111954 (improve error message for calling a method on a raw pointer with an unknown pointee)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Fix linking Mac Catalyst by including LC_BUILD_VERSION in object files
Hello. My first rustc PR!
Issue #106021 prevents Rust code from being linked into Mac Catalyst applications. Apple's LD has started requiring object files to contain version information about the platform they were built for, such as:
* the "deployment target" (minimum supported OS version),
* the SDK version
* the type of the platform (macOS/iOS/catalyst/tvOS/watchOS all have a different number).
This is currently only enforced when building for Mac Catalyst.
Rust uses the `object` crate which added support for including this information starting with `0.31.0`. ~~I upgraded it along with `thorin-dwp` so that everything depends on 0.31.
Apparently 0.31 [pulls in](https://github.com/gimli-rs/object/issues/463) `ruzstd` due to a [new ELF standard](https://maskray.me/blog/2022-09-09-zstd-compressed-debug-sections) because its `compression` feature is enabled by thorin. If you find this objectionable, let me know what the best way to avoid pulling in those dependencies might be.~~
**(`object` upgraded in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/111413)**
I then added two commits:
* The first one adds very basic, hard-coded support for calling `set_macho_build_version` for `-macabi` (Catalyst) targets, where it claims deployment target of Catalyst 14.0 and SDK of 16.2.
* The second weaves the versioning through `rust_target::spec::TargetOptions`, so that we can stick to specifying all target-related info in one place.
Kudos to ``@ara4n`` for writing [this gist](https://gist.github.com/ara4n/320a53ea768aba51afad4c9ed2168536).
This fixes#111220 by checking the privacy of tuple constructors using `Self`, so the following code now errors
```rust
mod my {
pub struct Foo(&'static str);
}
impl AsRef<str> for my::Foo {
fn as_ref(&self) -> &str {
let Self(s) = self; // previously compiled, now errors correctly
s
}
}
```
This reverts commit 827f656ebb.
Incremental is not sound to use across stages. Arbitrary changes to the compiler can invalidate the
incremental cache - even changes to normal queries, not incremental itself! - and we do not
currently enable `incremental-verify-ich` in bootstrap. Since 2018, we highly recommend and nudge
users towards stage 1 builds instead of stage 2, and using `keep-stage` for anything other than
libstd is very rare.
I don't think the risk of unsoundness is worth the very minor speedup when building libstd. Disable
incremental to avoid spurious panics and miscompilations when building with the stage 1 and 2
sysroot.
Ensure Fluent messages are in alphabetical order
Fixes#111847
This adds a tidy check to ensure Fluent messages are in alphabetical order, as well as sorting all existing messages. I think the error could be worded better, would appreciate suggestions.
<details>
<summary>Script used to sort files</summary>
```py
import sys
import re
fn = sys.argv[1]
with open(fn, 'r') as f:
data = f.read().split("\n")
chunks = []
cur = ""
for line in data:
if re.match(r"^([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)\s*=\s*", line):
chunks.append(cur)
cur = ""
cur += line + "\n"
chunks.append(cur)
chunks.sort()
with open(fn, 'w') as f:
f.write(''.join(chunks).strip("\n\n") + "\n")
```
</details>
[`unused_async`]: do not consider `await` in nested `async` blocks as used
Fixes#10800.
This PR makes sure that `await` expressions inside of inner `async` blocks don't prevent the lint from triggering.
For example
```rs
async fn foo() {
async {
std::future::ready(()).await;
}
}
```
Even though there *is* a `.await` expression in this function, it's contained in an async block, which means that the enclosing function doesn't need to be `async` too.
changelog: [`unused_async`]: do not consider `await` in nested `async` blocks as used
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #107522 (Add Median of Medians fallback to introselect)
- #111152 (update `pulldown-cmark` to `0.9.3`)
- #111757 (Consider lint check attributes on match arms)
- #111831 (Always capture slice when pattern requires checking the length)
- #111929 (Don't print newlines in APITs)
- #111945 (Migrate GUI colors test to original CSS color format)
- #111950 (Remove ExpnKind::Inlined.)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Don't print newlines in APITs
This is kind of a hack, but it gets the job done because the only "special" formatting that (afaict) `rustc_ast_pretty` does is break with newlines sometimes.
Fixesrust-lang/measureme#207
Always capture slice when pattern requires checking the length
Fixes#111751
cc ``@zirconium-n,`` I see you were assigned to this but I've fixed some similar issues in the past and had an idea on how to investigate this.
Consider lint check attributes on match arms
Currently, lint check attributes on match arms have no effect for some lints. This PR makes some lint passes to take those attributes into account.
- `LateContextAndPass` for late lint doesn't update `last_node_with_lint_attrs` when it visits match arms. This leads to lint check attributes on match arms taking no effects on late lints that operate on the arms' pattern:
```rust
match value {
#[deny(non_snake_case)]
PAT => {} // `non_snake_case` only warned due to default lint level
}
```
To be honest, I'm not sure whether this is intentional or just an oversight. I've dug the implementation history and searched up issues/PRs but couldn't find any discussion on this.
- `MatchVisitor` doesn't update its lint level when it visits match arms. This leads to check lint attributes on match arms taking no effect on some lints handled by this visitor, namely: `bindings_with_variant_name` and `irrefutable_let_patterns`.
This seems to be a fallout from #108504. Before 05082f57af, when the visitor operated on HIR rather than THIR, check lint attributes for the said lints were effective. [This playground][play] compiles successfully on current stable (1.69) but fails on current beta and nightly.
I wasn't sure where best to place the test for this. Let me know if there's a better place.
[play]: https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2021&gist=38432b79e535cb175f8f7d6d236d29c3
[play-match]: https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=beta&mode=debug&edition=2021&gist=629aa71b7c84b269beadeba664e2221d
