stabilize lint handling in rustdoc
When https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/51732 added CLI flags to manipulate lints in rustdoc, they were added as unstable flags. This made sense as they were new additions, but since they mirrored the flags that rustc has, it's worth considering them to not need an unstable period.
Stabilizing them also provides the opportunity for a critical fix: allowing Cargo to pass `--cap-lints allow` when documenting dependencies, the same as when it compiles them.
r? @rust-lang/rustdoc
RFC 2008 non-exhaustive enums/structs: Rustdoc
Part of #44109. Not sure how those who maintain rustdoc primarily would prefer this addition look or where it should be placed, happy to make any changes required.
r? @QuietMisdreavus (not sure if this is the right person, just guessing)
overhaul exit codes for rustc and rustdoc
This commit changes the exit status of rustc to 1 in the presence of
compilation errors. In the event of an unexpected panic (ICE) the
standard panic error exit status of 101 remains.
A run-make test is added to ensure that the exit code does not regress,
and compiletest is updated to check for an exit status of 1 or 101,
depending on the mode and suite.
This is a breaking change for custom drivers.
Note that while changes were made to the rustdoc binary, there is no
intended behavior change. rustdoc errors (i.e., failed lints) will still
report 101. While this could *also* hide potential ICEs, I will leave
that work to a future PR.
Fixes#51971.
rustdoc: remove FIXME about macro redirects
Based on the discussion in #35705, the rustdoc team has determined that macro redirects are here to stay.
Closes#35705
This commit changes the exit status of rustc to 1 in the presence of
compilation errors. In the event of an unexpected panic (ICE) the
standard panic error exit status of 101 remains.
A run-make test is added to ensure that the exit code does not regress,
and compiletest is updated to check for an exit status of 1 or 101,
depending on the mode and suite.
This is a breaking change for custom drivers.
Fixes#51971.
rustdoc: don't panic when the cross-re-export handler sees a proc-macro
When i moved the macro cross-re-export inlining code into `clean::inline`, i thought that if a macro had a `Def` that said it was a bang macro, it wouldn't be a proc macro. I thought wrong. Turns out, the `quote!()` in `libproc_macro` is actually a proc-macro, and when the `quote!()` macro is re-exported, this proc-macro is accessed in its place. This causes any `proc_macro::*` glob re-export to pull in this proc-macro, causing the assertion i added to fire, leading to an ICE. This replaces that with an Option that ignores proc-macros for the time being.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/52129
Upgrade to LLVM's master branch (LLVM 7)
### Current status
~~Blocked on a [performance regression](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/51966#issuecomment-402320576). The performance regression has an [upstream LLVM issue](https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38047) and has also [been bisected](https://reviews.llvm.org/D44282) to an LLVM revision.~~
Ready to merge!
---
This commit upgrades the main LLVM submodule to LLVM's current master branch.
The LLD submodule is updated in tandem as well as compiler-builtins.
Along the way support was also added for LLVM 7's new features. This primarily
includes the support for custom section concatenation natively in LLD so we now
add wasm custom sections in LLVM IR rather than having custom support in rustc
itself for doing so.
Some other miscellaneous changes are:
* We now pass `--gc-sections` to `wasm-ld`
* The optimization level is now passed to `wasm-ld`
* A `--stack-first` option is passed to LLD to have stack overflow always cause
a trap instead of corrupting static data
* The wasm target for LLVM switched to `wasm32-unknown-unknown`.
* The syntax for aligned pointers has changed in LLVM IR and tests are updated
to reflect this.
* ~~The `thumbv6m-none-eabi` target is disabled due to an [LLVM bug][llbug]~~
Nowadays we've been mostly only upgrading whenever there's a major release of
LLVM but enough changes have been happening on the wasm target that there's been
growing motivation for quite some time now to upgrade out version of LLD. To
upgrade LLD, however, we need to upgrade LLVM to avoid needing to build yet
another version of LLVM on the builders.
The revision of LLVM in use here is arbitrarily chosen. We will likely need to
continue to update it over time if and when we discover bugs. Once LLVM 7 is
fully released we can switch to that channel as well.
[llbug]: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37382
cc #50543
