refactor match guard
This is the first step to implement RFC 2294: if-let-guard. Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/51114
The second step should be introducing another variant `IfLet` in the Guard enum. I separated them into 2 PRs for the convenience of reviewers.
r? @petrochenkov
Implement the `min_const_fn` feature gate
cc @RalfJung @eddyb
r? @Centril
implements the feature gate for #53555
I added a hack so the `const_fn` feature gate also enables the `min_const_fn` feature gate. This ensures that nightly users of `const_fn` don't have to touch their code at all.
The `min_const_fn` checks are run first, and if they succeeded, the `const_fn` checks are run additionally to ensure we didn't miss anything.
Fix promotion stability hole in old borrowck
r? @nikomatsakis
I screwed up the promotion stability checks. Big time. They were basically nonexistant. We had tests for it. I also screwed up said tests. This is in stable already :(
Basically stability checks of promotion only worked if you tried to use a const fn defined in the same crate.
cc @eddyb
Rollup of 10 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #53418 (Mark some suggestions as MachineApplicable)
- #53431 (Moved some feature gate ui tests to correct location)
- #53442 (Update version of rls-data used with save-analysis)
- #53504 (Set applicability for more suggestions.)
- #53541 (Fix missing impl trait display as ret type)
- #53544 (Point at the trait argument when using unboxed closure)
- #53558 (Normalize source line and column numbers.)
- #53562 (Lament the invincibility of the Turbofish)
- #53574 (Suggest direct raw-pointer dereference)
- #53585 (Remove super old comment on function that parses items)
Failed merges:
- #53472 (Use FxHash{Map,Set} instead of the default Hash{Map,Set} everywhere in rustc.)
- #53563 (use String::new() instead of String::from(""), "".to_string(), "".to_owned() or "".into())
r? @ghost
Set applicability for more suggestions.
Converts a couple more calls to `span_suggestion_with_applicability` (#50723). To be on the safe side, I marked suggestions that depend on the intent of the user or that are potentially lossy conversions as MaybeIncorrect.
r? @estebank
The Great Generics Generalisation: HIR Followup
Addresses the final comments in #48149.
r? @eddyb, but there are a few things I have yet to clean up. Making the PR now to more easily see when things break.
cc @yodaldevoid
The error and check for this already existed, but the parser didn't try to parse trait method arguments as patterns, so the error was never emitted. This surfaces the error, so we get better errors than simple parse errors.
Suggest correct comparison against negative literal
When parsing as emplacement syntax (`x<-1`), suggest the correct syntax
for comparison against a negative value (`x< -1`).
Fix#45651.
Rename hir::ExprAgain to hir::ExprContinue
The current name is confusing and historical.
I also used this PR to clean up the annoying indentation in `check/mod.rs`. If that's viewed as too tangential a change, I'll split it up, but it seemed reasonable to slip it in to reduce @bors's work. It's easy to compare for the two commits individually.
r? @petrochenkov
