Invalid null usage v2
This is continuation of #6192 after inactivity.
I plan to move paths into the compiler as diagnostic items after this is merged.
fixes#1703
changelog: none
consider mutability on useless_vec suggestions
fixes#7035
changelog: Now the suggested by `useless_vec` considers mutability to suggest either `&[]`, as before, or `&mut []` if the used reference is mutable.
This is a quick-fix for an ICE in `tabs_in_doc_comments`. The problem
was that we we're indexing into possibly multi-byte characters, such as '位'.
More specifically `get_chunks_of_tabs` was returning indices into
multi-byte characters. Those were passed on to a `Span` creation that
then caused the ICE.
This fix makes sure that we don't return indices that point inside a
multi-byte character. *However*, we are still iterating over unicode
codepoints, not grapheme clusters. So a seemingly single character like y̆ ,
which actually consists of two codepoints, will probably still cause
incorrect spans in the output.
Don't trigger `same_item_push` if the vec is used in the loop body
fixes#6987
changelog: `same_item_push`: Don't trigger if the `vec` is used in the loop body
fix `missing_panics_doc` not detecting `assert_eq!` and `assert_ne!`
fixes#6997
changelog: `missing_panics_doc` detects `assert_eq!` and `assert_ne!`
---
searching for `assert_eq!` and `assert_ne!` in `FindPanicUnwrap`
New Lint: `branches_sharing_code`
This lint checks if all `if`-blocks contain some statements that are the same and can be moved out of the blocks to prevent code duplication. Here is an example:
```rust
let _ = if ... {
println!("Start"); // <-- Lint for code duplication
let _a = 99;
println!("End"); // <-- Lint for code duplication
false
} else {
println!("Start");
let _b = 17;
println!("End");
false
};
```
This could be written as:
```rust
println!("Start");
let _ = if ... {
let _a = 99;
false
} else {
let _b = 17;
false
};
println!("End");
```
---
This lint will get masked by the `IF_SAME_THEN_ELSE` lint. I think it makes more sense to only emit one lint per if block. This means that the folloing example:
```rust
if ... {
let _a = 17;
} else {
let _a = 17;
}
```
Will only trigger the `IF_SAME_THEN_ELSE` lint and not the `SHARED_CODE_IN_IF_BLOCKS` lint.
---
closes: #5234
changelog: Added a new lint: `branches_sharing_code`
And hello to the one that is writing the changelog for this release :D
Remove author requirement for `cargo_common_metadata`
This PR follows https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/pull/9282, I'm not fully informed about all of this, it would be great if somebody knowledgeable about this topic agrees.
changelog: Changed `cargo_common_metadata` to stop linting on the optional author field.
* Added expression check for shared_code_in_if_blocks
* Finishing touches for the shared_code_in_if_blocks lint
* Applying PR suggestions
* Update lints yay
* Moved test into subfolder
Fix `redundant_clone` fp
fixes: #5973fixes: #5595fixes: #6998
changelog: Fix `redundant_clone` fp where the cloned value is modified while the clone is in use.
Lint: filter(Option::is_some).map(Option::unwrap)
Fixes#6061
*Please write a short comment explaining your change (or "none" for internal only changes)*
changelog:
* add new lint for filter(Option::is_some).map(Option::unwrap)
First Rust PR, so I'm sure I've violated some idioms. Happy to change anything.
I'm getting one test failure locally -- a stderr diff for `compile_test`. I'm having a hard time seeing how I could be causing it, so I'm tentatively opening this in the hopes that it's an artifact of my local setup against `rustc`. Hoping it can at least still be reviewed in the meantime.
I'm gathering that since this is a method lint, and `.filter(...).map(...)` is already checked, the means of implementation needs to be a little different, so I didn't exactly follow the setup boilerplate. My way of checking for method calls seems a little too direct (ie, "is the second element of the expression literally the path for `Option::is_some`?"), but it seems like that's how some other lints work, so I went with it. I'm assuming we're not concerned about, eg, closures that just end up equivalent to `Option::is_some` by eta reduction.
disable upper_case_acronyms for pub items - enum edition
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/6803 (again... 😅 )
My previous fix did not work for enums because enum variants were checked separately in the `check_variant` function but it looks like we can't use that because we can't tell if the enum the variants belong to is declared as public or not (it always said `Inherited` for me)
I went and special-cased enums and iterated over all the variants "manually", but only, if the enums is not public.
---
changelog: fix upper_case_acronyms still firing on public enums (#6803)
Refactor types
r? `@flip1995`
This is the last PR to close#6724🎉
Also, this fixes#6936.
changelog: `vec_box`: Fix FN in `const` or `static`
changelog: `linkedlist`: Fix FN in `const` or `static`
changelog: `option_option`: Fix FN in `const` or `static`
Improve `clone_on_copy`
This also removes the `clone_on_copy_mut` test as the same thing is covered in the `clone_on_copy` test.
changelog: `copy_on_clone` lint on chained method calls taking self by value
changelog: `copy_on_clone` only lint when using the `Clone` trait
changelog: `copy_on_clone` correct suggestion when the cloned value is a macro call.
Lint on `_.clone().method()` when method takes self by value
Set applicability correctly
Correct suggestion when the cloned value is a macro call. e.g. `m!(x).clone()`
Don't lint when not using the `Clone` trait
Improve `expl_impl_clone_on_copy`
fixes: #1254
changelog: Check to see if the generic constraints are the same as if using derive for `expl_impl_clone_on_copy`
Found with https://github.com/est31/warnalyzer.
Dubious changes:
- Is anyone else using rustc_apfloat? I feel weird completely deleting
x87 support.
- Maybe some of the dead code in rustc_data_structures, in case someone
wants to use it in the future?
- Don't change rustc_serialize
I plan to scrap most of the json module in the near future (see
https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/418) and fixing the
tests needed more work than I expected.
TODO: check if any of the comments on the deleted code should be kept.
`len_without_is_empty` improvements
fixes: #6958fixes: #6972
changelog: Check the return type of `len`. Only integral types, or an `Option` or `Result` wrapping one.
changelog: Ensure the return type of `is_empty` matches. e.g. `Option<usize>` -> `Option<bool>`
Check the return type of `len`. Only integral types, or an `Option` or `Result` wrapping one.
Ensure the return type of `is_empty` matches. e.g. `Option<usize>` -> `Option<bool>`
Fix bad suggestion when a reborrow might be required
Fix bad suggestion when the value being sliced is a macro call
Don't lint inside of a macro due to the previous context sensitive changes
Ignore str::len() in or_fun_call lint.
changelog: Changed `or_fun_call` to ignore `str::len`, in the same way it ignores `slice::len` and `array::len`
Closes#6943
Refactor lints in methods module
This PR refactors methods lints other than the lints I refactored in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/6826 and moves some functions to methods/utils.rs.
Basically, I follow the instruction described in #6680.
**For ease of review, I refactored step by step, keeping each commit small.**
closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/6886
cc: `@phansch,` `@flip1995,` `@Y-Nak`
changelog: Move lints in methods module to their own modules and some function to methods/utils.rs.
search_is_some: add checking for `is_none()`
fixes: #6815
changelog: search_is_some: add checking for `is_none()`.
To be honest I don't know what is the process of renaming the lints. Appreciate any feedback if that needs to be handled differently. Thanks!
Fix bad suggestion for `match_single_binding` lint
Fix a bad suggestion that needs curly braces when the target `match` is the body of an arm.
Fixes#6572
changelog: none
`match_wildcard` improvements
fixes: #6604fixes: #5733fixes: #6862#5733 is only fixed in the normal case, if different paths are used for the variants then the same problem will occur. It's cause by `def_path_str` returning an utterly useless result. I haven't dug into why yet.
For #6604 there should be some discussion before accepting this. It's easy enough to change the message rather than disable the lint for `Option` and `Result`.
changelog: Attempt to find a common path prefix for `match_wildcard_for_single_variants` and `wildcard_enum_match_arm`
changelog: Don't lint op `Option` and `Result` for `match_wildcard_for_single_variants` and `wildcard_enum_match_arm`
changelog: Consider `or` patterns and `Self` prefix for `match_wildcard_for_single_variants` and `wildcard_enum_match_arm`
Deprecate `intrinsics::drop_in_place` and `collections::Bound`, which accidentally weren't deprecated
Fixes#82080.
I've taken the liberty of updating the `since` values to 1.52, since an unobservable deprecation isn't much of a deprecation (even the detailed release notes never bothered to mention these deprecations).
As mentioned in the issue I'm *pretty* sure that using a type alias for `Bound` is semantically equivalent to the re-export; [the reference implies](https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/items/type-aliases.html) that type aliases only observably differ from types when used on unit structs or tuple structs, whereas `Bound` is an enum.
ast/hir: Rename field-related structures
I always forget what `ast::Field` and `ast::StructField` mean despite working with AST for long time, so this PR changes the naming to less confusing and more consistent.
- `StructField` -> `FieldDef` ("field definition")
- `Field` -> `ExprField` ("expression field", not "field expression")
- `FieldPat` -> `PatField` ("pattern field", not "field pattern")
Various visiting and other methods working with the fields are renamed correspondingly too.
The second commit reduces the size of `ExprKind` by boxing fields of `ExprKind::Struct` in preparation for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/80080.
Don't lint on `Result` and `Option` types.
Considers `or` patterns.
Considers variants prefixed with `Self`
Suggestions will try to find a common prefix rather than just using the full path
Write literal suggestion
fixes: #6768
changelog: Add suggestion to `write_literal` and `print_literal` lints
changelog: Change `use_debug` to point only at the format string
StructField -> FieldDef ("field definition")
Field -> ExprField ("expression field", not "field expression")
FieldPat -> PatField ("pattern field", not "field pattern")
Also rename visiting and other methods working on them.
wrong_self_convention: fix lint in case of `to_*_mut` method
fixes#6758
changelog: wrong_self_convention: fix lint in case of `to_*_mut` method. When a method starts with `to_` and ends with `_mut`, clippy expects a `&mut self` parameter, otherwise `&self`.
Any feedback is welcome. I was also thinking if shouldn't we treat `to_` the same way as `as_`. Namely to accept `self` taken: `&self` or `&mut self`.
replace span_lint with span_lint_and_sugg along with error message
fixes: #6874
changelog: none
apologies if this may not be the most idiomatic way of doing it, any advice on changes (if any) would be greatly appreciated.
mem_replace_with_default: recognize some std library ctors
fixes#6562
changelog: mem_replace_with_default: recognize some common constructors equivalent to `Default::default()`
Fix suggestion for `explicit_deref_methods`. Sometimes `&**` is needed, sometimes nothing is needed.
Allow `explicit_deref_methods` to trigger in a few new contexts.
`explicit_deref_methods` will now consider ufcs calls
inconsistent_struct_constructor: try to make message and lint description a bit clearer
changelog: inconsistent_struct_constructor: try to make message and lint description a bit clearer
r? `@ghost`
Fix false positives on procedural macros of `missing_inline_in_public_items` lint
Fixes#6486.
changelog: Fix false positives on procedural macros of `missing_inline_in_public_items` lint.
Improve needless_borrowed_ref docs
changelog: none
I think "borrowed ref" is a confusing description for this lint. Destructuring a reference is the opposite of borrowing. So I updated the wording throughout the docs. Unfortunately this nit applies to the name of the lint itself, but I won't bother changing that. One motivation for these changes is to clarify the difference between this lint and `needless_borrow` (they are actually quite different). Let me know if I need to clarify anything or if you disagree with any changes.
Refactor casts lint
Ref: #6724
Changes:
1. Separate the `casts` group from the `types` group.
2. Reorganize the lints of the `casts` group into their own modules.
Notes:
1. I didn't `fix` #6874 in order to maintain this PR as small as possible.
---
changelog: none
or-patterns: disallow in `let` bindings
~~Blocked on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/81869~~
Disallows top-level or-patterns before type ascription. We want to reserve this syntactic space for possible future generalized type ascription.
r? ``@petrochenkov``
Opt-in to rustc_private for `rust-analyzer`
rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer#7891
changelog: none
This will also help priroda and any other package which depends on the `miri` library crate.
This gets rid of the following paths:
* OS_STRING
* TO_OWNED
* TO_STRING
Also removes some usages of:
* PATH_BUF
And the now completely unused `clippy_lints::types::is_ty_param_path`
Fix `manual_map` false positives
fixes: #6795fixes: #6797fixes: #6811fixes: #6819
changelog: Fix false positives for `manual_map` when `return`, `break`, `continue`, `yield`, `await`, and partially moved values are used.
changelog: Don't expand macros in suggestions for `manual_map`
Fix false positive for unit_arg lint
Fixes#6447
To avoid false positives don't complain about unit args when they come from a path expression, e.g. a local variable.
**Note:** This is my first contribution to Clippy, so I might have messed up somewhere. Any feedback is welcome and I'm happy to work out any kinks.
---
changelog: Do not lint unit arguments when they come from a path expression.
or_fun_call: fix suggestion for `or_insert(vec![])`
fixes#6748
changelog: or_fun_call: fix suggestion for `or_insert(vec![])` on `std::collections::hash_map::Entry` or `std::collections::btree_map::Entry`
Applies for `std::collections::hash_map::Entry` and `std::collections::btree_map::Entry`
Example:
Previously, for the following code:
`let _ = hash_map.entry("test".to_owned()).or_insert(vec![]);`
clippy would suggest to use:
`or_insert_with(vec![])`, which causes a compiler error (E0277).
Now clippy suggests:
`or_insert_with(Vec::new)`
move upper_case_acronyms back to style, but make the default behaviour less aggressive by default (can be unleashed via config option)
Previous discussion in the bi-weekly clippy meeting for reference: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/257328-clippy/topic/Meeting.202021-02-23/near/227458019
Move the `upper_case_acronyms` lint back to the style group.
Only warn on fully-capitalized names by default.
Add add a clippy-config option `upper-case-acronyms-aggressive: true/false` to enabled more aggressive linting on
all substrings that could be capitalized acronyms.
---
changelog: reenable upper_case_acronyms by default but make the more aggressive linting opt-in via config option
Moves the lint back from pedantic to style group.
The lint default now only warns on names that are completely capitalized, like "WORD"
and only if the name is longer than 2 chars (so that names where each of the letter represents a word are still distinguishable).
For example: FP (false positive) would still be "valid" and not warned about (but EOF would warn).
A "upper_case_acronyms_aggressive: true/false" config option was added that restores the original lint behaviour to warn
on any kind of camel case name that had more than one capital letter following another capital letter.
