There are too many of them, and they no longer match the set of crates
we have.
This really should be handled in a different way, by having out
"rust-analyzer: Run" generate the appropriate lldb config on the fly.
2681: cargo-watcher: Resolve macro call site in more cases r=matklad a=kiljacken
This resolves the actual macro call site in a few more cases, f.x. when a macro invokes `compile_error!` (I'm looking at you `ra_hir_def::path::__path`).
Co-authored-by: Emil Lauridsen <mine809@gmail.com>
2679: Resolve traits for infer using lang item infrastructure r=matklad a=kiljacken
As we already have the infrastructure for collecting lang items, use it to find the right traits when doing type-inference.
Co-authored-by: Emil Lauridsen <mine809@gmail.com>
2061: Theme loading and "editor.tokenColorCustomizations" support. r=matklad a=seivan
Fixes: [Issue#1294](https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/1294#issuecomment-497450325)
TODO:
- [x] Load themes
- [x] Load existing `ralsp`-prefixed overrides from `"workbench.colorCustomizations"`.
- [x] Load overrides from `"editor.tokenColorCustomizations.textMateRules"`.
- [x] Use RA tags to load `vscode.DecorationRenderOptions` (colors) from theme & overrides.
- [x] Map RA tags to common TextMate scopes before loading colors.
- [x] Add default scope mappings in extension.
- [x] Cache mappings between settings updates.
- [x] Add scope mapping configuration manifest in `package.json`
- [x] Load configurable scope mappings from settings.
- [x] Load JSON Scheme for text mate scope rules in settings.
- [x] Update [Readme](https://github.com/seivan/rust-analyzer/blob/feature/themes/docs/user/README.md#settings).
Borrowed the theme loading (`scopes.ts`) from `Tree Sitter` with some modifications to reading `"editor.tokenColorCustomizations"` for merging with loaded themes and had to remove the async portions to be able to load it from settings updates.
~Just a PoC and an idea I toyed around with a lot of room for improvement.~
For starters, certain keywords aren't part of the standard TextMate grammar, so it still reads colors from the `ralsp` prefixed values in `"workbench.colorCustomizations"`.
But I think there's more value making the extension work with existing themes by maping some of the decoration tags to existing key or keys.
<img width="453" alt="Screenshot 2019-11-09 at 17 43 18" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/55424/68531968-71b4e380-0318-11ea-924e-cdbb8d5eae06.png">
<img width="780" alt="Screenshot 2019-11-09 at 17 41 45" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/55424/68531950-4b8f4380-0318-11ea-8f85-24a84efaf23b.png">
<img width="468" alt="Screenshot 2019-11-09 at 17 40 29" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/55424/68531952-51852480-0318-11ea-800a-6ae9215f5368.png">
These will merge with the default ones coming with the extension, so you don't have to implement all of them and works well with overrides defined in settings.
```jsonc
"editor.tokenColorCustomizations": {
"textMateRules": [
{
"scope": "keyword",
"settings": {
"fontStyle": "bold",
}
},
]
},
```
Edit: The idea is to work with 90% of the themes out there by working within existing scopes available that are generally styled. It's not to say I want to erase the custom Rust scopes - those should still remain and eventually worked into a custom grammar bundle for Rust specific themes that target those, I just want to make it work with generic themes offered on the market place for now.
A custom grammar bundle and themes for Rust specific scopes is out of... scope for this PR.
We'll make another round to tackle those issues.
Current fallbacks implemented
```typescript
[
'comment',
[
'comment',
'comment.block',
'comment.line',
'comment.block.documentation'
]
],
['string', ['string']],
['keyword', ['keyword']],
['keyword.control', ['keyword.control', 'keyword', 'keyword.other']],
[
'keyword.unsafe',
['storage.modifier', 'keyword.other', 'keyword.control', 'keyword']
],
['function', ['entity.name.function']],
['parameter', ['variable.parameter']],
['constant', ['constant', 'variable']],
['type', ['entity.name.type']],
['builtin', ['variable.language', 'support.type', 'support.type']],
['text', ['string', 'string.quoted', 'string.regexp']],
['attribute', ['keyword']],
['literal', ['string', 'string.quoted', 'string.regexp']],
['macro', ['support.other']],
['variable', ['variable']],
['variable.mut', ['variable', 'storage.modifier']],
[
'field',
[
'variable.object.property',
'meta.field.declaration',
'meta.definition.property',
'variable.other'
]
],
['module', ['entity.name.section', 'entity.other']]
```
Co-authored-by: Seivan Heidari <seivan.heidari@icloud.com>
2668: In-server cargo check watching r=matklad a=kiljacken
Opening a draft now so people can follow the progress, and comment if they spot something stupid.
Things that need doing:
- [x] Running cargo check on save
- [x] Pipe through configuration options from client
- [x] Tests for parsing behavior
- [x] Remove existing cargo watch support from VSCode extension
- [x] Progress notification in VSCode extension using LSP 3.15 `$/progress` notification
- [ ] ~~Rework ra-ide diagnostics to support secondary messages~~
- [ ] ~~Make cargo-check watcher use ra-ide diagnostics~~
~~I'd love some input on whether to try to keep the status bar progress thingy for VSCode? It will require some plumbing, and maintaining yet another rust-analyzer specific LSP notification, which I'm not sure we want to.~~
Fixes#1894
Co-authored-by: Emil Lauridsen <mine809@gmail.com>
2667: Visibility r=matklad a=flodiebold
This adds the infrastructure for handling visibility (for fields and methods, not in name resolution) in the HIR and code model, and as a first application hides struct fields from completions if they're not visible from the current module. (We might want to relax this again later, but I think it's ok for now?)
Co-authored-by: Florian Diebold <flodiebold@gmail.com>
2657: Omit closure parameters in closure type display strings r=flodiebold a=SomeoneToIgnore
Part of https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/1946
I wonder, should we display the the closure trait (Fn/FnMut/FnOnce) in inlay hints instead of `|...|` at all?
Co-authored-by: Kirill Bulatov <mail4score@gmail.com>
