This commit is an implementation of [RFC 526][rfc] which is a change to alter
the definition of the old `fmt::FormatWriter`. The new trait, renamed to
`Writer`, now only exposes one method `write_str` in order to guarantee that all
implementations of the formatting traits can only produce valid Unicode.
[rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/0526-fmt-text-writer.md
One of the primary improvements of this patch is the performance of the
`.to_string()` method by avoiding an almost-always redundant UTF-8 check. This
is a breaking change due to the renaming of the trait as well as the loss of the
`write` method, but migration paths should be relatively easy:
* All usage of `write` should move to `write_str`. If truly binary data was
being written in an implementation of `Show`, then it will need to use a
different trait or an altogether different code path.
* All usage of `write!` should continue to work as-is with no modifications.
* All usage of `Show` where implementations just delegate to another should
continue to work as-is.
[breaking-change]
Closes#20352
This patch marks `PartialEq`, `Eq`, `PartialOrd`, and `Ord` as
`#[stable]`, as well as the majorify of manual implementaitons of these
traits. The traits match the [reform RFC](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/439).
In the future, many of the impls should be generalized; see #20063.
However, there is no problem stabilizing the less general impls, since
generalizing later is not a breaking change.
r? @alexcrichton
This patch marks `PartialEq`, `Eq`, `PartialOrd`, and `Ord` as
`#[stable]`, as well as the majorify of manual implementaitons of these
traits. The traits match the [reform
RFC](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/439).
Along the way, two changes are made:
* The recently-added type parameters for `Ord` and `Eq` are
removed. These were mistakenly added while adding them to `PartialOrd`
and `PartialEq`, but they don't make sense given the laws that are
required for (and use cases for) `Ord` and `Eq`.
* More explicit laws are added for `PartialEq` and `PartialOrd`,
connecting them to their associated mathematical concepts.
In the future, many of the impls should be generalized; see
since generalizing later is not a breaking change.
[breaking-change]
The new semantics of this function are that the callbacks are run when the *main
thread* exits, not when all threads have exited. This implies that other threads
may still be running when the `at_exit` callbacks are invoked and users need to
be prepared for this situation.
Users in the standard library have been audited in accordance to these new rules
as well.
Closes#20012
We've long had traits `StrVector` and `VectorVector` providing
`concat`/`connect` and `concat_vec`/`connect_vec` respectively. The
reason for the distinction is that coherence rules did not used to be
robust enough to allow impls on e.g. `Vec<String>` versus `Vec<&[T]>`.
This commit consolidates the traits into a single `SliceConcatExt` trait
provided by `slice` and the preldue (where it replaces `StrVector`,
which is removed.)
[breaking-change]
This commit takes a second pass through the `vec` module to
stabilize its API. The changes are as follows:
**Stable**:
* `dedup`
* `from_raw_parts`
* `insert`
* `into_iter`
* `is_empty`
* `remove`
* `reserve_exact`
* `reserve`
* `retain`
* `swap_remove`
* `truncate`
**Deprecated**:
* `from_fn`, `from_elem`, `grow_fn` and `grow`, all deprecated in
favor of iterators. See https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/509
* `partition`, `partitioned`, deprecated in favor of a new, more
general iterator consumer called `partition`.
* `unzip`, deprecated in favor of a new, more general iterator
consumer called `unzip`.
A few remaining methods are left at experimental status.
[breaking-change]
This commit performs a second pass over the `std::string` module, performing the
following actions:
* The name `std::string` is now stable.
* The `String::from_utf8` function is now stable after having been altered to
return a new `FromUtf8Error` structure. The `FromUtf8Error` structure is now
stable as well as its `into_bytes` and `utf8_error` methods.
* The `String::from_utf8_lossy` function is now stable.
* The `String::from_chars` method is now deprecated in favor of `.collect()`
* The `String::from_raw_parts` method is now stable
* The `String::from_str` function remains experimental
* The `String::from_raw_buf` function remains experimental
* The `String::from_raw_buf_len` function remains experimental
* The `String::from_utf8_unchecked` function is now stable
* The `String::from_char` function is now deprecated in favor of
`repeat(c).take(n).collect()`
* The `String::grow` function is now deprecated in favor of
`.extend(repeat(c).take(n)`
* The `String::capacity` method is now stable
* The `String::reserve` method is now stable
* The `String::reserve_exact` method is now stable
* The `String::shrink_to_fit` method is now stable
* The `String::pop` method is now stable
* The `String::as_mut_vec` method is now stable
* The `String::is_empty` method is now stable
* The `IntoString` trait is now deprecated (there are no implementors)
* The `String::truncate` method is now stable
* The `String::insert` method is now stable
* The `String::remove` method is now stable
* The `String::push` method is now stable
* The `String::push_str` method is now stable
* The `String::from_utf16` function is now stable after its error type has now
become an opaque structure to carry more semantic information in the future.
A number of these changes are breaking changes, but the migrations should be
fairly straightforward on a case-by-case basis (outlined above where possible).
[breaking-change]
The methods `from_bits` and `from_bits_truncate` were missing from the
list of generated methods. Didn't see a useful way to abbreviate, so
added with the same docstrings used in the macro definition.
Since runtime is removed, rust has no tasks anymore and everything is moving
from being task-* to thread-*. Let’s rename TaskRng as well!
This is a breaking change. If a breaking change for consistency is not desired, feel free to close.
* Both enums already derived `Copy`, but storing them in any
struct/container would prevent implementing `Clone` for said
struct/container even though they should be clonable.
* Also add PartialEq and Eq for good measure.
I've created a patch for #20226, which maps `EEXIST` to the `PathAlreadyExists` error on Unix. To test this, I use `mkdir`, which raises `EEXIST` if the directory already exists.
On Windows, I map `ERROR_ALREADY_EXISTS` to `PathAlreadyExist`, but I am note sure if `mkdir` on Windows raises `ERROR_ALREADY_EXISTS` and do not have a Windows installation handy for testing.
And I noticed another thing. No error seems to map to `IoErrorKind::PathDoesntExist` and I am wondering what the difference to `FileNotFound` is?
The example derived Hash + Eq on a type that was used as *values* for
a hashmap.. for the example to make sense, we have to use a custom *key*
type.
Write a slightly more involved example, still using Vikings, but this
time as key.
I preferred using String over &str here, since that's the typical usage
and we might want to lead users down that path.
The first six commits are from an earlier PR (#19858) and have already been reviewed. This PR makes an awful hack in the compiler to accommodate slices both natively and in the index a range form. After a snapshot we can hopefully add the new Index impls and then we can remove these awful hacks.
r? @nikomatsakis (or anyone who knows the compiler, really)
This commit performs a second pass for stabilization over the `std::ptr` module.
The specific actions taken were:
* The `RawPtr` trait was renamed to `PtrExt`
* The `RawMutPtr` trait was renamed to `PtrMutExt`
* The module name `ptr` is now stable.
* These functions were all marked `#[stable]` with no modification:
* `null`
* `null_mut`
* `swap`
* `replace`
* `read`
* `write`
* `PtrExt::is_null`
* `PtrExt::is_not_null`
* `PtrExt::offset`
* These functions remain unstable:
* `as_ref`, `as_mut` - the return value of an `Option` is not fully expressive
as null isn't the only bad value, and it's unclear
whether we want to commit to these functions at this
time. The reference/lifetime semantics as written are
also problematic in how they encourage arbitrary
lifetimes.
* `zero_memory` - This function is currently not used at all in the
distribution, and in general it plays a broader role in the
"working with unsafe pointers" story. This story is not yet
fully developed, so at this time the function remains
unstable for now.
* `read_and_zero` - This function remains unstable for largely the same
reasons as `zero_memory`.
* These functions are now all deprecated:
* `PtrExt::null` - call `ptr::null` or `ptr::null_mut` instead.
* `PtrExt::to_uint` - use an `as` expression instead.
All of the current std::sync primitives have poisoning enable which means that
when a task fails inside of a write-access lock then all future attempts to
acquire the lock will fail. This strategy ensures that stale data whose
invariants are possibly not upheld are never viewed by other tasks to help
propagate unexpected panics (bugs in a program) among tasks.
Currently there is no way to test whether a mutex or rwlock is poisoned. One
method would be to duplicate all the methods with a sister foo_catch function,
for example. This pattern is, however, against our [error guidelines][errors].
As a result, this commit exposes the fact that a task has failed internally
through the return value of a `Result`.
[errors]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/0236-error-conventions.md#do-not-provide-both-result-and-fail-variants
All methods now return a `LockResult<T>` or a `TryLockResult<T>` which
communicates whether the lock was poisoned or not. In a `LockResult`, both the
`Ok` and `Err` variants contains the `MutexGuard<T>` that is being returned in
order to allow access to the data if poisoning is not desired. This also means
that the lock is *always* held upon returning from `.lock()`.
A new type, `PoisonError`, was added with one method `into_guard` which can
consume the assertion that a lock is poisoned to gain access to the underlying
data.
This is a breaking change because the signatures of these methods have changed,
often incompatible ways. One major difference is that the `wait` methods on a
condition variable now consume the guard and return it in as a `LockResult` to
indicate whether the lock was poisoned while waiting. Most code can be updated
by calling `.unwrap()` on the return value of `.lock()`.
[breaking-change]
This commit performs a second pass for stabilization over the `std::ptr` module.
The specific actions taken were:
* The `RawPtr` trait was renamed to `PtrExt`
* The `RawMutPtr` trait was renamed to `MutPtrExt`
* The module name `ptr` is now stable.
* These functions were all marked `#[stable]` with no modification:
* `null`
* `null_mut`
* `swap`
* `replace`
* `read`
* `write`
* `PtrExt::is_null`
* `PtrExt::offset`
* These functions remain unstable:
* `as_ref`, `as_mut` - the return value of an `Option` is not fully expressive
as null isn't the only bad value, and it's unclear
whether we want to commit to these functions at this
time. The reference/lifetime semantics as written are
also problematic in how they encourage arbitrary
lifetimes.
* `zero_memory` - This function is currently not used at all in the
distribution, and in general it plays a broader role in the
"working with unsafe pointers" story. This story is not yet
fully developed, so at this time the function remains
unstable for now.
* `read_and_zero` - This function remains unstable for largely the same
reasons as `zero_memory`.
* These functions are now all deprecated:
* `PtrExt::null` - call `ptr::null` or `ptr::null_mut` instead.
* `PtrExt::to_uint` - use an `as` expression instead.
* `PtrExt::is_not_null` - use `!p.is_null()` instead.
This commit performs a second pass over the `std::string` module, performing the
following actions:
* The name `std::string` is now stable.
* The `String::from_utf8` function is now stable after having been altered to
return a new `FromUtf8Error` structure. The `FromUtf8Error` structure is now
stable as well as its `into_bytes` and `utf8_error` methods.
* The `String::from_utf8_lossy` function is now stable.
* The `String::from_chars` method is now deprecated in favor of `.collect()`
* The `String::from_raw_parts` method is now stable
* The `String::from_str` function remains experimental
* The `String::from_raw_buf` function remains experimental
* The `String::from_raw_buf_len` function remains experimental
* The `String::from_utf8_unchecked` function is now stable
* The `String::from_char` function is now deprecated in favor of
`repeat(c).take(n).collect()`
* The `String::grow` function is now deprecated in favor of
`.extend(repeat(c).take(n)`
* The `String::capacity` method is now stable
* The `String::reserve` method is now stable
* The `String::reserve_exact` method is now stable
* The `String::shrink_to_fit` method is now stable
* The `String::pop` method is now stable
* The `String::as_mut_vec` method is now stable
* The `String::is_empty` method is now stable
* The `IntoString` trait is now deprecated (there are no implementors)
* The `String::truncate` method is now stable
* The `String::insert` method is now stable
* The `String::remove` method is now stable
* The `String::push` method is now stable
* The `String::push_str` method is now stable
* The `String::from_utf16` function is now stable after its error type has now
become an opaque structure to carry more semantic information in the future.
A number of these changes are breaking changes, but the migrations should be
fairly straightforward on a case-by-case basis (outlined above where possible).
[breaking-change]
This stabilizes most methods on `&str` working with patterns in a way that is forwards-compatible with a generic string pattern matching API:
- Methods that are using the primary name for their operation are marked as `#[stable]`, as they can be upgraded to a full `Pattern` API later without existing code breaking. Example: `contains(&str)`
- Methods that are using a more specific name in order to not clash with the primary one are marked as `#[unstable]`, as they will likely be removed once their functionality is merged into the primary one. Example: `contains_char<C: CharEq>(C)`
- The method docs got changed to consistently refer to the pattern types as a pattern.
- Methods whose names do not match in the context of the more generic API got renamed. Example: `trim_chars -> trim_matches`
Additionally, all methods returning iterators got changed to return unique new types with changed names in accordance with the new naming guidelines.
See also https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/528
Due to some deprecations and type changes, this is a
[breaking-change]
All of the current std::sync primitives have poisoning enable which means that
when a task fails inside of a write-access lock then all future attempts to
acquire the lock will fail. This strategy ensures that stale data whose
invariants are possibly not upheld are never viewed by other tasks to help
propagate unexpected panics (bugs in a program) among tasks.
Currently there is no way to test whether a mutex or rwlock is poisoned. One
method would be to duplicate all the methods with a sister foo_catch function,
for example. This pattern is, however, against our [error guidelines][errors].
As a result, this commit exposes the fact that a task has failed internally
through the return value of a `Result`.
[errors]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/0236-error-conventions.md#do-not-provide-both-result-and-fail-variants
All methods now return a `LockResult<T>` or a `TryLockResult<T>` which
communicates whether the lock was poisoned or not. In a `LockResult`, both the
`Ok` and `Err` variants contains the `MutexGuard<T>` that is being returned in
order to allow access to the data if poisoning is not desired. This also means
that the lock is *always* held upon returning from `.lock()`.
A new type, `PoisonError`, was added with one method `into_guard` which can
consume the assertion that a lock is poisoned to gain access to the underlying
data.
This is a breaking change because the signatures of these methods have changed,
often incompatible ways. One major difference is that the `wait` methods on a
condition variable now consume the guard and return it in as a `LockResult` to
indicate whether the lock was poisoned while waiting. Most code can be updated
by calling `.unwrap()` on the return value of `.lock()`.
[breaking-change]
