Extend E0623 for fn items
This fixes#44516
The below example now gives
```
error[E0623]: lifetime mismatch
--> gg.rs:3:10
|
2 | fn foo(x:fn(&u8, &u8), y: Vec<&u8>, z: &u8) {
| --- --- these two types are declared with different lifetimes...
3 | y.push(z);
| ^ ...but data from `z` flows into `y` here
error: aborting due to previous error
```
r? @nikomatsakis
cc @arielb1
In #42436 the behavior for spawning processes on Windows was tweaked slightly to
fix various bugs, but this caused #42791 as a regression, namely that to spawn
batch scripts they need to be manually spawned with `cmd /c` instead now. This
updates the compiler to handle this case explicitly for Emscripten.
Closes#42791
(The idea is that the StorageDead marks the point where the memory can
be deallocated, and the EndRegion is marking where borrows of that
memory can no longer legally exist.)
Fix mispositioned error indicators
Fixes#38384
Most of the Rust community uses 4 spaces for indentation,
but there are also tab users of Rust (including myself!).
This patch fixes a bug in error printing which mispositions
error indicators when near code with tabs.
The code attempted to fix the issue by replacing spaces
with tabs, but it sadly wasn't enough, as sometimes
you may not print spaces but _ or ^ instead.
This patch employs the reverse strategy: it replaces each
tab with a space, so that the number of _ and ^ and spaces
in error indicators below the code snippet line up
perfectly.
In a study [1] preceeding this patch, we could see that
this strategy is also chosen by gcc version 6.3.0.
Its not perfect, as the output is not beautiful, but its
the easiest to implement. If anyone wants to improve on
this, be my guest! This patch is meant as improvement of
the status quo, not as perfect end status. It fixes the
actual issue of mispositioning error indicators.
[1]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/38384#issuecomment-326813710
rustc: Make `CrateStore` private to `TyCtxt`
This commit makes the `CrateStore` object private to the `ty/context.rs` module and also absent on the `Session` itself.
cc #44390
cc #44341 (initial commit pulled and rebased from here)
On Windows, the gcc crate would send /Wall to msvc, which would cause
builds to get flooded with warnings, exploding compile times from one
hour to more than 72! The gcc crate version 0.3.54 changes this behavior
to send /W4 instead, which greatly cuts down on cl.exe flooding the
command prompt window with warnings.
impl Hasher for {&mut Hasher, Box<Hasher>}
**Rationale:** The `Hash` trait has `fn hash<H: Hasher>(&self, state: &mut H)`, which can only accept a `Sized` hasher, even if the `Hasher` trait is object-safe. We cannot retroactively add the `?Sized` bound without breaking stability, thus implementing `Hasher` to a trait object reference is the next best solution.
**Warning:** These `impl` are insta-stable, and should need an FCP. I don't think a full RFC is necessary.
Autodetect the type of allocator crate used
Annotate the allocator crates (allocator_system, allocator_jemalloc) by the type of allocator they are. If one is requested as an exe allocator, detect its type by the flags.
This has the effect that using this (de jure wrong) configuration in the target spec works instead of producing a really unhelpful and arcane linker error:
"exe-allocation-crate": "alloc_system"
Fixes#43524.
There are two yet unsolved FIXME's, I'll be glad for some advice on what to do with them.
Add or_default to Entry APIs
As argued for in #44324, this PR adds a new `or_default` method to the various `Entry` APIs (currently just for `BTreeMap` and `HashMap`) when `V: Default`. This method is effectively a shorthand for `or_insert_with(Default::default)`.
Additional traits for std::mem::ManuallyDrop
The first commit adds `Clone` and `Copy` trait implementations for `ManuallyDrop`. Although `Drop` and `Copy` cannot be used together, this may be useful for generics.
The second commit adds implementations common traits. I do not think this is necessary, as they could be implemented in a wrapper type outside the standard library, but it would make `ManuallyDrop` more convenient to use.
