6043: Allow missing trait members assist without needing braces r=matklad a=M-J-Hooper
Assist to complete missing items when implementing a trait does not appear without impl def braces (see #5144 ).
The reason behind this was that this assist is based on `ast::AssocItemList` which only appears in the AST after the braces are added to the impl def.
Instead of relying on and replacing the item list, we now instead replace the entire `ast::Impl` and add the item list if its missing.
Co-authored-by: Matt Hooper <matthewjhooper94@gmail.com>
6018: Correct project_root path for ProjectJson. r=jonas-schievink a=woody77
It was already the folder containing the rust-project.json file, not the file itself. This also removes the Option-ness of it, since it's now an infallible operation to set the member value.
Co-authored-by: Aaron Wood <aaronwood@google.com>
6036: Don't re-read open files from disk when reloading a workspace r=kjeremy a=lnicola
Fixes#5742Fixes#4263
or so I hope.
Co-authored-by: Laurențiu Nicola <lnicola@dend.ro>
6017: Don't return any TextEdit if formatting is unchanged r=jonas-schievink a=cuviper
I found that `textDocument/formatting` was always returning a full
`TextEdit` replacement, even when there are no changes, which caused Vim
(w/ vim-lsp) to always indicate a modified buffer after formatting. We
can easily compare whether there were changes and return `null` if not,
so the client knows there's nothing to do.
Co-authored-by: Josh Stone <cuviper@gmail.com>
6016: Emit diagnostics for unresolved imports and extern crates r=jonas-schievink a=jonas-schievink
AFAIK, we don't have any major bugs in name resolution that would cause a lot of false positives here (except procedural attribute macro support and some rare issues around `#[path]` on module files), so these are *not* marked as experimental diagnostics right now.
I noticed that diagnostics in a file sometimes don't get displayed after opening, but require some edit to be performed. This seems like a preexisting issue though.
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonas.schievink@ferrous-systems.com>
5989: Rewrite import merging r=jonas-schievink a=Veykril
Rewrites how import merging is being handled. It is now a recursive function to properly handle merging of intermediate levels in the import trees. With this ordering the imports is also now possible tho it doesn't quite order it the same way as `rustfmt` does yet, namely it orders lowercase identifiers after uppercase identifiers as that is the standard character order that rust uses. This also fixes a few weird behaviors that were visible in some of the `replace_qualified_name_with_use.rs` tests.
This really took longer than I was hoping for, fighting with import trees is quite the exhausting task 😅
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <lukastw97@gmail.com>
6013: Add support for custom flycheck commands with JSON project workspaces r=jonas-schievink a=woody77
Enable flychecks with JSON project workspaces if an override command was provided as part
of the client configuration:
```
"rust-analyzer.checkOnSave.enable": true,
"rust-analyzer.checkOnSave.overrideCommand": ["custom_tool", "arg1", "arg2"],
```
Co-authored-by: Aaron Wood <aaronwood@google.com>
I found that `textDocument/formatting` was always returning a full
`TextEdit` replacement, even when there are no changes, which caused Vim
(w/ vim-lsp) to always indicate a modified buffer after formatting. We
can easily compare whether there were changes and return `null` if not,
so the client knows there's nothing to do.
5976: Complete trait impl immediately after type/const/fn r=jonas-schievink a=oxalica
Currently, we can complete type/const/fn but only if we typed an identifier.
That is, `impl .. { fn f<|> }` has completions with all trait fn including `f`, but `impl .. { fn <|> }` doesn't provide any suggestion (even if explicit trigger it).
This PR tweak the logic of completion match to make it possible.
However, we still need to explicit trigger suggestions (`Control + Space` by default) in vscode to show. Not sure if we can make it automatically triggered after typing the space after `fn`.
Another question is that I cannot figure out why `BLOCK_EXPR` need to be checked. A block expr directly inside a impl block should be invalid, and nested items will failed to locate impl block in specific offset and skip the suggestion. Now I simply removed it and no tests are broken.
4f91478e50/crates/ide/src/completion/complete_trait_impl.rs (L109)
Co-authored-by: oxalica <oxalicc@pm.me>
5985: Make MergeBehaviour configurable r=jonas-schievink a=Veykril
This should make the newly implemented `MergeBehaviour` for import insertion configurable as roughly outlined in https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/pull/5935#issuecomment-685834257. For the config name and the like I just picked what came to mind so that might be up for bikeshedding.
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <lukastw97@gmail.com>
5971: Implement async blocks r=flodiebold a=oxalica
Fix#4018
@flodiebold already gave a generic guide in the issue. Here's some concern about implementation detail:
- Chalk doesn't support generator type yet.
- Adding generator type as a brand new type (ctor) can be complex and need to *re-introduced* builtin impls. (Like how we implement closures before native closure support of chalk, which is already removed in #5401 )
- The output type of async block should be known after type inference of the whole body.
- We cannot directly get the type from source like return-positon-impl-trait. But we still need to provide trait bounds when chalk asking for `opaque_ty_data`.
- During the inference, the output type of async block can be temporary unknown and participate the later inference.
`let a = async { None }; let _: i32 = a.await.unwrap();`
So in this PR, the type of async blocks is inferred as an opaque type parameterized by the `Future::Output` type it should be, like what we do with closure type.
And it really works now.
Well, I still have some questions:
- The bounds `AsyncBlockImplType<T>: Future<Output = T>` is currently generated in `opaque_ty_data`. I'm not sure if we should put this code here.
- Type of async block is now rendered as `impl Future<Output = OutputType>`. Do we need to special display to hint that it's a async block? Note that closure type has its special format, instead of `impl Fn(..) -> ..` or function type.
Co-authored-by: oxalica <oxalicc@pm.me>
