6013: Add support for custom flycheck commands with JSON project workspaces r=jonas-schievink a=woody77
Enable flychecks with JSON project workspaces if an override command was provided as part
of the client configuration:
```
"rust-analyzer.checkOnSave.enable": true,
"rust-analyzer.checkOnSave.overrideCommand": ["custom_tool", "arg1", "arg2"],
```
Co-authored-by: Aaron Wood <aaronwood@google.com>
I found that `textDocument/formatting` was always returning a full
`TextEdit` replacement, even when there are no changes, which caused Vim
(w/ vim-lsp) to always indicate a modified buffer after formatting. We
can easily compare whether there were changes and return `null` if not,
so the client knows there's nothing to do.
6010: Avoid checking all ancestors and fix mis-completion r=jonas-schievink a=oxalica
Refactor the logic of `completion_match` to check deterministic number of ancestors instead of `token.ancestors().find_map()`.
This should fix wrong completions (https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/pull/5976#issuecomment-692332191) and hopefully make completion to be faster (#6004).
More play and test? @jonas-schievink @hammypants
If this patch works, we can avoid the revert #6005 . 😞
Co-authored-by: oxalica <oxalicc@pm.me>
6008: inline parameters for a function description r=jonas-schievink a=bnjjj
close#6002
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Coenen <5719034+bnjjj@users.noreply.github.com>
6001: Add GitHub Sponsors link to blog post template r=jonas-schievink a=jonas-schievink
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonas.schievink@ferrous-systems.com>
5976: Complete trait impl immediately after type/const/fn r=jonas-schievink a=oxalica
Currently, we can complete type/const/fn but only if we typed an identifier.
That is, `impl .. { fn f<|> }` has completions with all trait fn including `f`, but `impl .. { fn <|> }` doesn't provide any suggestion (even if explicit trigger it).
This PR tweak the logic of completion match to make it possible.
However, we still need to explicit trigger suggestions (`Control + Space` by default) in vscode to show. Not sure if we can make it automatically triggered after typing the space after `fn`.
Another question is that I cannot figure out why `BLOCK_EXPR` need to be checked. A block expr directly inside a impl block should be invalid, and nested items will failed to locate impl block in specific offset and skip the suggestion. Now I simply removed it and no tests are broken.
4f91478e50/crates/ide/src/completion/complete_trait_impl.rs (L109)
Co-authored-by: oxalica <oxalicc@pm.me>
5985: Make MergeBehaviour configurable r=jonas-schievink a=Veykril
This should make the newly implemented `MergeBehaviour` for import insertion configurable as roughly outlined in https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/pull/5935#issuecomment-685834257. For the config name and the like I just picked what came to mind so that might be up for bikeshedding.
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <lukastw97@gmail.com>
5971: Implement async blocks r=flodiebold a=oxalica
Fix#4018
@flodiebold already gave a generic guide in the issue. Here's some concern about implementation detail:
- Chalk doesn't support generator type yet.
- Adding generator type as a brand new type (ctor) can be complex and need to *re-introduced* builtin impls. (Like how we implement closures before native closure support of chalk, which is already removed in #5401 )
- The output type of async block should be known after type inference of the whole body.
- We cannot directly get the type from source like return-positon-impl-trait. But we still need to provide trait bounds when chalk asking for `opaque_ty_data`.
- During the inference, the output type of async block can be temporary unknown and participate the later inference.
`let a = async { None }; let _: i32 = a.await.unwrap();`
So in this PR, the type of async blocks is inferred as an opaque type parameterized by the `Future::Output` type it should be, like what we do with closure type.
And it really works now.
Well, I still have some questions:
- The bounds `AsyncBlockImplType<T>: Future<Output = T>` is currently generated in `opaque_ty_data`. I'm not sure if we should put this code here.
- Type of async block is now rendered as `impl Future<Output = OutputType>`. Do we need to special display to hint that it's a async block? Note that closure type has its special format, instead of `impl Fn(..) -> ..` or function type.
Co-authored-by: oxalica <oxalicc@pm.me>
5987: Bump node-fetch from 2.6.0 to 2.6.1 in /editors/code r=kjeremy a=dependabot[bot]
Bumps [node-fetch](https://github.com/bitinn/node-fetch) from 2.6.0 to 2.6.1.
<details>
<summary>Release notes</summary>
<p><em>Sourced from <a href="https://github.com/bitinn/node-fetch/releases">node-fetch's releases</a>.</em></p>
<blockquote>
<h2>v2.6.1</h2>
<p><strong>This is an important security release. It is strongly recommended to update as soon as possible.</strong></p>
<p>See <a href="https://github.com/node-fetch/node-fetch/blob/master/docs/CHANGELOG.md#v261">CHANGELOG</a> for details.</p>
</blockquote>
</details>
<details>
<summary>Changelog</summary>
<p><em>Sourced from <a href="https://github.com/node-fetch/node-fetch/blob/master/docs/CHANGELOG.md">node-fetch's changelog</a>.</em></p>
<blockquote>
<h2>v2.6.1</h2>
<p><strong>This is an important security release. It is strongly recommended to update as soon as possible.</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Fix: honor the <code>size</code> option after following a redirect.</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
</details>
<details>
<summary>Commits</summary>
<ul>
<li><a href="b5e2e41b2b"><code>b5e2e41</code></a> update version number</li>
<li><a href="2358a6c256"><code>2358a6c</code></a> Honor the <code>size</code> option after following a redirect and revert data uri support</li>
<li><a href="8c197f8982"><code>8c197f8</code></a> docs: Fix typos and grammatical errors in README.md (<a href="https://github-redirect.dependabot.com/bitinn/node-fetch/issues/686">#686</a>)</li>
<li><a href="1e99050f94"><code>1e99050</code></a> fix: Change error message thrown with redirect mode set to error (<a href="https://github-redirect.dependabot.com/bitinn/node-fetch/issues/653">#653</a>)</li>
<li><a href="244e6f63d4"><code>244e6f6</code></a> docs: Show backers in README</li>
<li><a href="6a5d192034"><code>6a5d192</code></a> fix: Properly parse meta tag when parameters are reversed (<a href="https://github-redirect.dependabot.com/bitinn/node-fetch/issues/682">#682</a>)</li>
<li><a href="47a24a03eb"><code>47a24a0</code></a> chore: Add opencollective badge</li>
<li><a href="7b136627c5"><code>7b13662</code></a> chore: Add funding link</li>
<li><a href="5535c2ed47"><code>5535c2e</code></a> fix: Check for global.fetch before binding it (<a href="https://github-redirect.dependabot.com/bitinn/node-fetch/issues/674">#674</a>)</li>
<li><a href="1d5778ad0d"><code>1d5778a</code></a> docs: Add Discord badge</li>
<li>Additional commits viewable in <a href="https://github.com/bitinn/node-fetch/compare/v2.6.0...v2.6.1">compare view</a></li>
</ul>
</details>
<details>
<summary>Maintainer changes</summary>
<p>This version was pushed to npm by <a href="https://www.npmjs.com/~akepinski">akepinski</a>, a new releaser for node-fetch since your current version.</p>
</details>
<br />
[](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/configuring-github-dependabot-security-updates)
Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting `@dependabot rebase`.
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start)
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end)
---
<details>
<summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary>
<br />
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
- `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR
- `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
- `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
- `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed
- `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
- `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot use these labels` will set the current labels as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
- `@dependabot use these reviewers` will set the current reviewers as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
- `@dependabot use these assignees` will set the current assignees as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
- `@dependabot use this milestone` will set the current milestone as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
You can disable automated security fix PRs for this repo from the [Security Alerts page](https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/network/alerts).
</details>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
5981: Properly preserve macro braces during dbg! removal r=jonas-schievink a=SomeoneToIgnore
Do `dbg![2 + 2] * 5` -> `(2 + 2) * 5`
This PR also implicitly handles the `{}` case too, but I decided not to add it into the test case since it's a compiler error on the latest stable rustc.
Co-authored-by: Kirill Bulatov <mail4score@gmail.com>
