This leaks a lot of LSP details into ide layer, which we want to avoid:
c9cec381bc/docs/dev (lsp-independence)
Additionally, all what this infra does is providing a toggle for
auto-import completion, but we already have one!
7181: Document project_model::PackageData and project_model::TargetData r=arnaudgolfouse a=arnaudgolfouse
This PR adds some documentation for the `project_model` crate.
Some of the field descriptions were taken directly from their `cargo_metadata` counterpart :
- `PackageData` -> `cargo_metadata::Package`
- `TargetData` -> `cargo_metadata::Target`
Co-authored-by: Arnaud <arnaud.golfouse@free.fr>
Rather than eagerly converting JSON, we losslessly keep it as is, and
change the shape of user-submitted data at the last moment.
This also allows us to remove a bunch of wrong Defaults
7176: Attribute completion r=matklad a=FlowerBOII
Solve #7167.
I removed the optional args for the attributes ```deprecated```, ```must_use``` and ```should_panic```.
I also updated their respective tests.
Please let me know if I missed something.
Co-authored-by: FlowerBOII <42295129+FlowerBOII@users.noreply.github.com>
7140: Store trait associated items in fst r=matklad a=SomeoneToIgnore
Store imported traits' associated function/methods and constants into `ImportMap.fst` and pefrorm the imports search on them.
This is a first step towards trait autoimport during completion functionality, the way I see it, after this PR, only a few major things are left to be done:
* store all traits' assoc items into fst, not only the ones in scope, as we do now. Any code pointers on how to do this are welcome 😄
* adjust a few modules in completions crate (`dot.rs`, `qualified_path.rs` at least) to query the import map, reusing the `import_assets` logic heavily
==
With the current import and autoimport implementations, it looks like for a single query, we're either interested in either associated items lookup or in all other `fst` contents lookup, but never both simultaneously.
I would rather not split `fst` in two but add another `Query` parameter to separate those, but let me know if you have any ideas.
Co-authored-by: Kirill Bulatov <mail4score@gmail.com>
7131: Created an assist for inlining a function's body into its caller r=matklad a=Michael-F-Bryan
This introduces an `inline_function` assist which will convert code like this:
```rust
fn add(a: u32, b: u32) -> u32 { a + b }
fn main() {
let x = add<|>(1, 2);
}
```
Into something like this:
```rust
fn add(a: u32, b: u32) -> u32 { a + b }
fn main() {
let x = {
let a = 1;
let b = 2;
a + b
};
}
```
Fixes#6863.
Co-authored-by: Michael-F-Bryan <michaelfbryan@gmail.com>
7162: Introduce queries to avoid problems when performing completion for enums with many variants r=matklad a=danielframpton
This change introduces two new queries to compute:
1) attributes for all variants of an enum, and
2) attributes for all fields of a variant.
The purpose of this change is to avoid the current n^2 behavior when rendering completion for variants (which prevents completion for enums with large numbers of variants).
Co-authored-by: Daniel Frampton <Daniel.Frampton@microsoft.com>
1) the set of attributes for all variants of an enum, and
2) the set of attributes for all fields of a variant.
This avoids the current n^2 behavior when rendering completion for variants, which
prevents completion for enums with large numbers of variants.
7160: Get `hir::Function` return type r=flodiebold a=arnaudgolfouse
Hello !
As said in #7158, I noticed that `hir::Function` has no direct way of getting the return type, so this PR adds this functionality.
Co-authored-by: Arnaud <arnaud.golfouse@free.fr>
7147: ssr: Allow replacing expressions with statements r=davidlattimore a=MarijnS95
Depends on #6587
Until that is merged, the diff is https://github.com/MarijnS95/rust-analyzer/compare/stmt..replace-expr-with-stmt
---
Now that statements can be matched and replaced (#6587) some usecases require expressions to be replaced with statements as well. This happens when something that can ambiguously be an expression or statement like `if` and loop blocks appear in the last position of a block, as trailing expression. In this case a replacement pattern of the form `if foo(){$a();}==>>$a();` will only substitute `if` blocks in the list of statements but not if they (implicitly) end up in the trailing expression, where they are not wrapped by an EXPR_STMT (but the pattern and template are, as parsing only succeeds for the `stmt ==>> stmt` case).
Instead of adding two rules that match an expression - and emit duplicate matching errors - allow the template for expressions to be a statement if it fails to parse as an expression.
---
Another gross change that does not seem to break any tests currently, but perhaps a safeguard should be added to only allow this kind of replacement in blocks by "pushing" the replacement template to the statement list and clearing the trailing expression?
CC @davidlattimore
Co-authored-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn@traverseresearch.nl>
