check array type of repeat exprs is wf
Fixes#111091
Also makes sure that we actually renumber regions in the length of repeat exprs which we previously weren't doing and would cause ICEs in `adt_const_params` + `generic_const_exprs` from attempting to prove the wf goals when the length was an unevaluated constant with `'erased` in the `ty` field of `Const`
The duplicate errors are caused by the fact that `const_arg_to_const`/`array_len_to_const` in `FnCtxt` adds a `WellFormed` goal for the created `Const` which is also checked by the added `WellFormed(array_ty)`. I don't want to change this to just emit a `T: Sized` goal for the element type since that would ignore `ConstArgHasType` wf requirements and generally uncomfortable with the idea of trying to sync up `wf::obligations` for arrays and the code in hir typeck for repeat exprs.
r? `@compiler-errors`
correctly recurse when expanding anon consts
recursing with `super_fold_with` is wrong in case `bac` is itself normalizable, the test that was supposed to test for this being wrong did not actually test for this in reality because of the usage of `{ (N) }` instead of `{{ N }}`. The former resulting in a simple `ConstKind::Param` instead of `ConstKind::Unevaluated`. Tbh generally this test seems very brittle and it will be a lot easier to test once we have normalization of assoc consts since then we can just test that `T::ASSOC` normalizes to some `U::OTHER` which normalizes to some third thing.
r? `@compiler-errors`
Encode def span for foreign return-position `impl Trait` in trait
Fixes#111031, yet another def-span encoding issue :/
Includes a smaller repro than the issue, but I can confirm it ICEs:
```
query stack during panic:
#0 [def_span] looking up span for `rpitit::Foo::bar::{opaque#0}`
#1 [object_safety_violations] determining object safety of trait `rpitit::Foo`
#2 [check_is_object_safe] checking if trait `rpitit::Foo` is object safe
#3 [typeck] type-checking `main`
#4 [used_trait_imports] finding used_trait_imports `main`
#5 [analysis] running analysis passes on this crate
```
Luckily since this only affects nightly, this desn't need to be backported.
Explicitly reject negative and reservation drop impls
Fixes#110858
It doesn't really make sense for a type to have a `!Drop` impl. Or at least, I don't want us to implicitly assign a meaning to it by the way the compiler *currently* handles it (incompletely), and rather I would like to see a PR (or an RFC...) assign a meaning to `!Drop` if we actually wanted one for it.
Add cross-language LLVM CFI support to the Rust compiler
This PR adds cross-language LLVM Control Flow Integrity (CFI) support to the Rust compiler by adding the `-Zsanitizer-cfi-normalize-integers` option to be used with Clang `-fsanitize-cfi-icall-normalize-integers` for normalizing integer types (see https://reviews.llvm.org/D139395).
It provides forward-edge control flow protection for C or C++ and Rust -compiled code "mixed binaries" (i.e., for when C or C++ and Rust -compiled code share the same virtual address space). For more information about LLVM CFI and cross-language LLVM CFI support for the Rust compiler, see design document in the tracking issue #89653.
Cross-language LLVM CFI can be enabled with -Zsanitizer=cfi and -Zsanitizer-cfi-normalize-integers, and requires proper (i.e., non-rustc) LTO (i.e., -Clinker-plugin-lto).
Thank you again, ``@bjorn3,`` ``@nikic,`` ``@samitolvanen,`` and the Rust community for all the help!
Implement tuple<->array convertions via `From`
This PR adds the following impls that convert between homogeneous tuples and arrays of the corresponding lengths:
```rust
impl<T> From<[T; 1]> for (T,) { ... }
impl<T> From<[T; 2]> for (T, T) { ... }
/* ... */
impl<T> From<[T; 12]> for (T, T, T, T, T, T, T, T, T, T, T, T) { ... }
impl<T> From<(T,)> for [T; 1] { ... }
impl<T> From<(T, T)> for [T; 2] { ... }
/* ... */
impl<T> From<(T, T, T, T, T, T, T, T, T, T, T, T)> for [T; 12] { ... }
```
IMO these are quite uncontroversial but note that they are, just like any other trait impls, insta-stable.
This commit adds cross-language LLVM Control Flow Integrity (CFI)
support to the Rust compiler by adding the
`-Zsanitizer-cfi-normalize-integers` option to be used with Clang
`-fsanitize-cfi-icall-normalize-integers` for normalizing integer types
(see https://reviews.llvm.org/D139395).
It provides forward-edge control flow protection for C or C++ and Rust
-compiled code "mixed binaries" (i.e., for when C or C++ and Rust
-compiled code share the same virtual address space). For more
information about LLVM CFI and cross-language LLVM CFI support for the
Rust compiler, see design document in the tracking issue #89653.
Cross-language LLVM CFI can be enabled with -Zsanitizer=cfi and
-Zsanitizer-cfi-normalize-integers, and requires proper (i.e.,
non-rustc) LTO (i.e., -Clinker-plugin-lto).
Don't bail out early when checking invalid `repr` attr
Fixes#111051
An invalid repr delays a bug. If there are other invalid attributes on the item, we emit a warning and exit without re-checking the repr here, so no error is emitted and the delayed bug ICEs
Implement negative bounds for internal testing purposes
Implements partial support the `!` negative polarity on trait bounds. This is incomplete, but should allow us to at least be able to play with the feature.
Not even gonna consider them as a public-facing feature, but I'm implementing them because would've been nice to have in UI tests, for example in #110671.
Currently a `{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage` can be created from any type that
impls `Into<String>`. That includes `&str`, `String`, and `Cow<'static,
str>`, which are reasonable. It also includes `&String`, which is pretty
weird, and results in many places making unnecessary allocations for
patterns like this:
```
self.fatal(&format!(...))
```
This creates a string with `format!`, takes a reference, passes the
reference to `fatal`, which does an `into()`, which clones the
reference, doing a second allocation. Two allocations for a single
string, bleh.
This commit changes the `From` impls so that you can only create a
`{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage` from `&str`, `String`, or `Cow<'static,
str>`. This requires changing all the places that currently create one
from a `&String`. Most of these are of the `&format!(...)` form
described above; each one removes an unnecessary static `&`, plus an
allocation when executed. There are also a few places where the existing
use of `&String` was more reasonable; these now just use `clone()` at
the call site.
As well as making the code nicer and more efficient, this is a step
towards possibly using `Cow<'static, str>` in
`{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage::{Str,Eager}`. That would require changing
the `From<&'a str>` impls to `From<&'static str>`, which is doable, but
I'm not yet sure if it's worthwhile.
Mark`feature(return_position_impl_trait_in_trait)` and`feature(async_fn_in_trait)` as not incomplete
I think they've graduated, since as far as I'm aware, they don't cause compiler crashes or unsoundness anymore.
Fix elaboration with associated type bounds
When computing a trait's supertrait predicates, do not add any associated type *trait* bounds to that list of supertrait predicates. This is because supertrait predicates are expected to have the same `Self` type as the trait.
For example, given:
```rust
trait Foo: Bar<Assoc: Send>
```
Before, we would compute that the supertrait predicates of `T: Foo` are `T: Bar` and `<T as Bar>::Assoc: Send`. However, the last bound is a trait predicate for a totally different type than `T`, and existing code that uses supertrait bounds such as vtable construction, closure fn signature deduction, etc. all rely on the invariant that we have a list of predicates for self type `T`.
Fixes#76593
The reason for all the extra diagnostic noise is that we're recomputing predicates with a different filter now. These diagnostics should be deduplicated for any end-user though.
---
This does bring up an interesting question -- is the predicate `<T as Bar>::Assoc: Send` an implied bound of `T: Foo`? Because currently the only bounds implied by a (non-alias) trait are its supertraits. I guess I could fix this too, but it would require even more changes, and I'm inclined to punt this question along.
Stabilize debugger_visualizer
This stabilizes the `debugger_visualizer` attribute (#95939).
* Marks the `debugger_visualizer` feature as `accepted`.
* Marks the `debugger_visualizer` attribute as `ungated`.
* Deletes feature gate test, removes feature gate from other tests.
Closes#95939
Add `ConstParamTy` trait
This is a bit sketch, but idk.
r? `@BoxyUwU`
Yet to be done:
- [x] ~~Figure out if it's okay to implement `StructuralEq` for primitives / possibly remove their special casing~~ (it should be okay, but maybe not in this PR...)
- [ ] Maybe refactor the code a little bit
- [x] Use a macro to make impls a bit nicer
Future work:
- [ ] Actually™ use the trait when checking if a `const` generic type is allowed
- [ ] _Really_ refactor the surrounding code
- [ ] Refactor `marker.rs` into multiple modules for each "theme" of markers
Don't validate constants in const propagation
Validation is neither necessary nor desirable.
The constant validation is already omitted at mir-opt-level >= 3, so there there are not changes in MIR test output (the propagation of invalid constants is covered by an existing test in tests/mir-opt/const_prop/invalid_constant.rs).
Round-trip encoding/decoding of many types is tested in
`compiler/rustc_serialize/tests/opaque.rs`. There is also a small amount
of encoding/decoding testing in three files in `tests/ui-fulldeps`.
There is no obvious reason why these three files are necessary. They
were originally added in 2014. Maybe it wasn't possible for a proc
macro to run in a unit test back then?
This commit just moves the testing from those three files into the unit
test.
