Implement `for<>` lifetime binder for closures
This PR implements RFC 3216 ([TI](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/97362)) and allows code like the following:
```rust
let _f = for<'a, 'b> |a: &'a A, b: &'b B| -> &'b C { b.c(a) };
// ^^^^^^^^^^^--- new!
```
cc ``@Aaron1011`` ``@cjgillot``
Fixes for `branches_sharing_code`
fixes#7198fixes#7452fixes#7555fixes#7589
changelog: Don't suggest moving modifications to locals used in any of the condition expressions in `branches_sharing_code`
changelog: Don't suggest moving anything after a local with a significant drop in `branches_sharing_code`
* Don't suggest moving modifications to locals used in any of the condition expressions
* Don't suggest moving anything after a local with a significant drop
rustc comiler internals helpfully tell us how to fix the issue:
to get the signature of a closure, use `substs.as_closure().sig()` not `fn_sig()`
Fixes ICE in #9041
Fix `#[expect]` for most clippy lints
This PR fixes most `#[expect]` - lint interactions listed in rust-lang/rust#97660. [My comment in the issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/97660#issuecomment-1147269504) shows the current progress (Once this is merged). I plan to work on `duplicate_mod` and `multiple_inherent_impl` and leave the rest for later. I feel like stabilizing the feature is more important than fixing the last few nits, which currently also don't work with `#[allow]`.
---
changelog: none
r? `@Jarcho`
cc: rust-lang/rust#97660
feat(new lint): new lint `manual_retain`
close#8097
This PR is a new lint implementation.
This lint checks if the `retain` method is available.
Thank you in advance.
changelog: add new ``[`manual_retain`]`` lint
feat(fix): ignore `todo!` and `unimplemented!` in `if_same_then_else`
close: #8836
take over: #8853
This PR adds check `todo!` and `unimplemented!` in if_same_then_else.
( I thought `unimplemented` should not be checked as well as todo!.)
Thank you in advance.
changelog: ignore todo! and unimplemented! in if_same_then_else
r? `@Jarcho`
once cell renamings
This PR does the renamings proposed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/74465#issuecomment-1153703128
- Move/rename `lazy::{OnceCell, Lazy}` to `cell::{OnceCell, LazyCell}`
- Move/rename `lazy::{SyncOnceCell, SyncLazy}` to `sync::{OnceLock, LazyLock}`
(I used `Lazy...` instead of `...Lazy` as it seems to be more consistent, easier to pronounce, etc)
```@rustbot``` label +T-libs-api -T-libs
