This handles the case where the #[main] function is buried deeper in
the ast than we search for #[test] functions. I'm not sure why one
would want to do that, but since it works in standard compilation it
should also work for tests.
This increases regionck performance greatly - type-checking on
librustc decreased from 9.1s to 8.1s. Because of Amdahl's law,
total performance is improved only by about 1.5% (LLVM wizards,
this is your opportunity to shine!).
before:
576.91user 4.26system 7:42.36elapsed 125%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 1142192maxresident)k
after:
566.50user 4.84system 7:36.84elapsed 125%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 1124304maxresident)k
I am somewhat worried really need to find out why we have this Red Queen's
Race going on here. Originally I suspected it may be a problem from RFC1214's
warnings, but it seems to be an effect from other changes.
However, the increase seems to be mostly in LLVM's time, so I guess
it's the LLVM wizards' problem.
r? @nikomatsakis
Reserving lower_bound bytes was just silly. It’d be perfectly reasonable
to have empty strings in the iterator, which could cause superfluous
reallocation of the string, or to have more than one byte per string,
which could cause additional reallocation (in practice it’ll balance
out). The added complexity of this logic is simply pointless, adding
a little bloat with no demonstrable advantage and slight disadvantage.
The functions is useful for all kinds of fat pointers, but get_len()
just feels so wrong for trait object fat pointers. Let's use get_meta()
because that's rather neutral.
This increases regionck performance greatly - type-checking on
librustc decreased from 9.1s to 8.1s. Because of Amdahl's law,
total performance is improved only by about 1.5% (LLVM wizards,
this is your opportunity to shine!).
before:
576.91user 4.26system 7:42.36elapsed 125%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 1142192maxresident)k
after:
566.50user 4.84system 7:36.84elapsed 125%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 1124304maxresident)k
I am somewhat worried really need to find out why we have this Red Queen's
Race going on here. Originally I suspected it may be a problem from RFC1214's
warnings, but it seems to be an effect from other changes.
However, the increase seems to be mostly in LLVM's time, so I guess
it's the LLVM wizards' problem.
The implementation of the remainder operation belongs to
librustc_trans, but it is also stubbed out in libcore in order to
expose it as a trait on primitive types. Instead of exposing some
implementation details (like the upcast to `f64` in MSVC), use a
minimal implementation just like that of the `Div` trait.
Since enums are namespaced now, should we also remove the `Fk` prefixes from `FnKind` and remove the reexport? (The reexport must be removed because otherwise it clashes with glob imports containing `ItemFn`). IMO writing `FnKind::Method` is much clearer than `FkMethod`.
It doesn't really make sense for DefId to be in libsyntax -- it is concerned with a single crate only. It is the compiler that understands the idea of many crates. (At some point, there might be a useful intermediate point here.) This is a refactoring in support of incr. compilation, which will be adjusting the notion of a DefId to make it more durable across compilations.
This will probably be a [breaking-change] for every plugin ever. You need to adjust things as follows:
use rustc::middle::def_id::{DefId, LOCAL_CRATE}; // two most common definitions
ast_util::is_local(def_id) => def_id.is_local()
ast_util::local_def(node_id) => DefId::local(node_id)
We're currently possibly introducing an unneeded temporary, make use of
InsertValue which is said to kick us off of FastISel and we generate
loads/stores of first class aggregates, which is bad as well. Let's not
do all these things.
Part of #24407.
This PR doesn't have code example since I didn't find how to raise it. If someone finds a code which does, please say it !
cc @pnkfelix
cc @eddyb
r? @Manishearth
We're currently possibly introducing an unneeded temporary, make use of
InsertValue which is said to kick us off of FastISel and we generate
loads/stores of first class aggregates, which is bad as well. Let's not
do all these things.
