Use u64 for incr comp allocation offsets
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/76037
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/95780
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/111613
These issues are all reporting ICEs caused by using `u32` to store offsets to allocations in the incremental compilation cache. This PR aims to lift that limitation by changing the offset type in question to `u64`.
There are two perf runs in this PR. The first reports a regression, and the second does not. The changes are the same in both. I rebased the PR then did the second perf run because I noticed that the primary regression in it was very commonly seen in spurious regression reports.
I do not know what the perf run will report when this is merged. I would not be surprised to see regression or neutral, but the cachegrind diffs for the regression point at `try_mark_previous_green` which is a common source of inexplicable regressions and I don't think should be perturbed by this PR.
I'm not opposed to adding a regression test such as
```rust
fn main() {
println!("{}", [37; 1 << 30].len());
}
```
But that program takes 1 minute to compile and consumes 4.6 GB of memory then writes that much to disk. Is that a concerning amount of resource use for a test?
r? `@nnethercote`
Streamline size estimates (take 2)
This was merged in #113684 but then [something happened](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/113684#issuecomment-1636811985):
> There has been a bors issue that lead to the merge commit of this PR getting purged from master.
> You'll have to make a new PR to reapply it.
So this is exactly the same changes.
`@bors` r=wesleywiser
Add support for inherent projections in new solver
Not hard to support these, and it cuts out a really big chunk of failing UI tests with `--compare-mode=next-solver`
r? `@lcnr` (feel free to reassign, anyone can review this)
This means we call `MonoItem::size_estimate` (which involves a query)
less often: just once per mono item, and then once more per inline item
placement. After that we can reuse the stored value as necessary. This
means `CodegenUnit::compute_size_estimate` is cheaper.
Resurrect: rustc_target: Add alignment to indirectly-passed by-value types, correcting the alignment of byval on x86 in the process.
Same as #111551, which I [accidentally closed](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/111551#issuecomment-1571222612) :/
---
This resurrects PR #103830, which has sat idle for a while.
Beyond #103830, this also:
- fixes byval alignment for types containing vectors on Darwin (see `tests/codegen/align-byval-vector.rs`)
- fixes byval alignment for overaligned types on x86 Windows (see `tests/codegen/align-byval.rs`)
- fixes ABI for types with 128bit requested alignment on ARM64 Linux (see `tests/codegen/aarch64-struct-align-128.rs`)
r? `@nikic`
---
`@pcwalton's` original PR description is reproduced below:
Commit 88e4d2c from five years ago removed
support for alignment on indirectly-passed arguments because of problems with
the `i686-pc-windows-msvc` target. Unfortunately, the `memcpy` optimizations I
recently added to LLVM 16 depend on this to forward `memcpy`s. This commit
attempts to fix the problems with `byval` parameters on that target and now
correctly adds the `align` attribute.
The problem is summarized in [this comment] by `@eddyb.` Briefly, 32-bit x86 has
special alignment rules for `byval` parameters: for the most part, their
alignment is forced to 4. This is not well-documented anywhere but in the Clang
source. I looked at the logic in Clang `TargetInfo.cpp` and tried to replicate
it here. The relevant methods in that file are
`X86_32ABIInfo::getIndirectResult()` and
`X86_32ABIInfo::getTypeStackAlignInBytes()`. The `align` parameter attribute
for `byval` parameters in LLVM must match the platform ABI, or miscompilations
will occur. Note that this doesn't use the approach suggested by eddyb, because
I felt it was overkill to store the alignment in `on_stack` when special
handling is really only needed for 32-bit x86.
As a side effect, this should fix#80127, because it will make the `align`
parameter attribute for `byval` parameters match the platform ABI on LLVM
x86-64.
[this comment]: #80822 (comment)
Make it clearer that we're just checking for an RPITIT
Tiny nit to use `is_impl_trait_in_trait` more, to make it clearer that we're just checking whether a def-id is an RPITIT, rather than doing something meaningful with the `opt_rpitit_info`.
r? `@spastorino`
Use maybe_body_owned_by for multiple suggestions
This is a continued work from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/113567
We have several other suggestions not working for closure, this PR use `maybe_body_owned_by` to fix them and add test cases for them.
Add a cache for `maybe_lint_level_root_bounded`
`maybe_lint_level_root_bounded` is called many times and traces node sub-paths many times. This PR adds a cache that lets many of these tracings be skipped, avoiding lots of calls to functions like `Map::attrs` and `Map::parent_id`.
r? `@cjgillot`
refactor proof tree formatting
mostly:
- handle indentation via a separate formatter
- change nested to use a closure
tested it after rebasing on top of #113536 and everything looks good.
r? `````@BoxyUwU`````
miri: protect Move() function arguments during the call
This gives `Move` operands a meaning specific to function calls:
- for the duration of the call, the place the operand comes from is protected, making all read and write accesses insta-UB.
- the contents of that place are reset to `Uninit`, so looking at them again after the function returns, we cannot observe their contents
Turns out we can replace the existing "retag return place" hack with the exact same sort of protection on the return place, which is nicely symmetric.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/112564
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/2927
This starts with a Miri rustc-push, since we'd otherwise conflict with a PR that recently landed in Miri.
(The "miri tree borrows" commit is an unrelated cleanup I noticed while doing the PR. I can remove it if you prefer.)
r? `@oli-obk`
Introduce `trait DebugWithInfcx` to debug format types with universe info
Seeing universes of infer vars is valuable for debugging but currently we have no way of easily debug formatting a type with the universes of all the infer vars shown. In the future I hope to augment the new solver's proof tree output with a `DebugWithInfcx` impl so that it can show universes but I left that out of this PR as it would be non trivial and this is already large and complex enough.
The goal here is to make the various abstractions taking `T: Debug` able to use the codepath for printing out universes, that way we can do `debug!("{:?}", my_x)` and have `my_x` have universes shown, same for the `write!` macro. It's not possible to put the `Infcx: InferCtxtLike<I>` into the formatter argument to `Debug::fmt` so it has to go into the self ty. For this we introduce the type `OptWithInfcx<I: Interner, Infcx: InferCtxtLike<I>, T>` which has the data `T` optionally coupled with the infcx (more on why it's optional later).
Because of coherence/orphan rules it's not possible to write the impl `Debug for OptWithInfcx<..., MyType>` when `OptWithInfcx` is in a upstream crate. This necessitates a blanket impl in the crate defining `OptWithInfcx` like so: `impl<T: DebugWithInfcx> Debug for OptWithInfcx<..., T>`. It is not intended for people to manually call `DebugWithInfcx::fmt`, the `Debug` impl for `OptWithInfcx` should be preferred.
The infcx has to be optional in `OptWithInfcx` as otherwise we would end up with a large amount of code duplication. Almost all types that want to be used with `OptWithInfcx` do not themselves need access to the infcx so if we were to not optional we would end up with large `Debug` and `DebugWithInfcx` impls that were practically identical other than that when formatting their fields we wrap the field in `OptWithInfcx` instead of formatting it alone.
The only types that need access to the infcx themselves are ty/const/region infer vars, everything else is implemented by having the `Debug` impl defer to `OptWithInfcx` with no infcx available. The `DebugWithInfcx` impl is pretty much just the standard `Debug` impl except that instead of recursively formatting fields with `write!(f, "{x:?}")` we must do `write!(f, "{:?}", opt_infcx.wrap(x))`. This is some pretty rough boilerplate but I could not think of an alternative unfortunately.
`OptWithInfcx::wrap` is an eager `Option::map` because 99% of callsites were discarding the existing data in `OptWithInfcx` and did not need lazy evaluation.
A trait `InferCtxtLike` was added instead of using `InferCtxt<'tcx>` as we need to implement `DebugWithInfcx` for types living in `rustc_type_ir` which are generic over an interner and do not have access to `InferCtxt` since it lives in `rustc_infer`. Additionally I suspect that adding universe info to new solver proof tree output will require an implementation of `InferCtxtLike` for something that is not an `InferCtxt` although this is not the primary motivaton.
---
To summarize:
- There is a type `OptWithInfcx` which bundles some data optionally with an infcx with allows us to pass an infcx into a `Debug` impl. It's optional instead of being there unconditionally so that we can share code for `Debug` and `DebugWithInfcx` impls that don't care about whether there is an infcx available but have fields that might care.
- There is a trait `DebugWithInfcx` which allows downstream crates to add impls of the form `Debug for OptWithInfcx<...>` which would normally be forbidden by orphan rules/coherence.
- There is a trait `InferCtxtLike` to allow us to implement `DebugWithInfcx` for types that live in `rustc_type_ir`
This allows debug formatting various `ty::*` structures with universes shown by using the `Debug` impl for `OptWithInfcx::new(ty, infcx)`
---
This PR does not add `DebugWithInfcx` impls to absolutely _everything_ that should realistically have them, for example you cannot use `OptWithInfcx<Obligation<Predicate>>`. I am leaving this to a future PR to do so as it would likely be a lot more work to do.
Rename `adjustment::PointerCast` and variants using it to `PointerCoercion`
It makes it sounds like the `ExprKind` and `Rvalue` are supposed to represent all pointer related casts, when in reality their just used to share a little enum variants. Make it clear there these are only coercions and that people who see this and think "why are so many pointer related casts not in these variants" aren't insane.
This enum was added in #59987. I'm not sure whether the variant sharing is actually worth it, but this at least makes it less confusing.
r? oli-obk
It makes it sound like the `ExprKind` and `Rvalue` are supposed to represent all pointer related
casts, when in reality their just used to share a some enum variants. Make it clear there these
are only coercion to make it clear why only some pointer related "casts" are in the enum.
Move `TyCtxt::mk_x` to `Ty::new_x` where applicable
Part of rust-lang/compiler-team#616
turns out there's a lot of places we construct `Ty` this is a ridiculously huge PR :S
r? `@oli-obk`
Specialize `try_destructure_mir_constant` for its sole user (pretty printing)
We can't remove the query, as we need to invoke it from rustc_middle, but can only implement it in mir interpretation/const eval.
r? `@RalfJung` for a first round.
While we could move all the logic into pretty printing, that would end up duplicating a bit of code with const eval, which doesn't seem great either.
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #113010 (rust-installer & rls: remove exclusion from rustfmt & tidy )
- #113317 ( -Ztrait-solver=next: stop depending on old solver)
- #113319 (`TypeParameterDefinition` always require a `DefId`)
- #113320 (Add some extra information to opaque type cycle errors)
- #113321 (Move `ty::ConstKind` to `rustc_type_ir`)
- #113337 (Winnow specialized impls during selection in new solver)
- #113355 (Move most coverage code out of `rustc_codegen_ssa`)
- #113356 (Add support for NetBSD/riscv64 aka. riscv64gc-unknown-netbsd.)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
