Fix overflow when converting ZST Vec to VecDeque
```rust
let v = vec![(); 100];
let queue = VecDeque::from(v);
println!("{:?}", queue);
```
This code will currently panic with a capacity overflow.
This PR resolves this issue and makes the code run fine.
Resolves#78532
Prefer regions with an `external_name` in `approx_universal_upper_bound`
Fixes#75785
When displaying a MIR borrowcheck error, we may need to find an upper
bound for a region, which gives us a region to point to in the error
message. However, a region might outlive multiple distinct universal
regions, in which case the only upper bound is 'static
To try to display a meaningful error message, we compute an
'approximate' upper bound by picking one of the universal regions.
Currently, we pick the region with the lowest index - however, this
caused us to produce a suboptimal error message in issue #75785
This PR `approx_universal_upper_bound` to prefer regions with an
`external_name`. This causes us to prefer regions from function
arguments/upvars, which seems to lead to a nicer error message in some
cases.
Currently, the rustc_macros::symbols macro generates two
`macro_rules!` macros as its output. These two macros are
used in rustc_span/src/symbol.rs.
This means that each Symbol that we define is represented
in the AST of rustc_symbols twice: once in the definition
of the `define_symbols!` macro (similarly for the
`keywords! macro), and once in the rustc_span::symbols
definition.
That would be OK if there were only a handful of symbols,
but currently we define over 1100 symbols. The definition
of the `define_symbols!` macro contains the expanded definition
of each symbol, so that's a lot of AST storage wasted on a
macro that is used exactly once.
This commit removes the `define_symbols` macro, and simply
allows the proc macro to directly generate the
`rustc_symbols::symbol::sym` module.
The benefit is mainly in reducing memory wasted during
compilation of rustc itself. It should also reduce memory used
by Rust Analyzer.
This commit also reduces the size of the AST for symbol
definitions, by moving two `#[allow(...)]` attributes from
the symbol constants to the `sym` module. This eliminates 2200+
attribute nodes.
This commit also eliminates the need for the `digits_array`
constant. There's no need to store an array of Symbol values
for digits. We can simply define a constant of the base value,
and add to that base value.
Fixes#75785
When displaying a MIR borrowcheck error, we may need to find an upper
bound for a region, which gives us a region to point to in the error
message. However, a region might outlive multiple distinct universal
regions, in which case the only upper bound is 'static
To try to display a meaningful error message, we compute an
'approximate' upper bound by picking one of the universal regions.
Currently, we pick the region with the lowest index - however, this
caused us to produce a suboptimal error message in issue #75785
This PR `approx_universal_upper_bound` to prefer regions with an
`external_name`. This causes us to prefer regions from function
arguments/upvars, which seems to lead to a nicer error message in some
cases.
Move binder for dyn to each list item
This essentially changes `ty::Binder<&'tcx List<ExistentialTraitRef>>` to `&'tcx List<ty::Binder<ExistentialTraitRef>>`.
This is a first step in moving the `dyn Trait` representation closer to Chalk, which we've talked about in `@rust-lang/wg-traits.`
r? `@nikomatsakis`
Move binder for dyn to each list item
This essentially changes `ty::Binder<&'tcx List<ExistentialTraitRef>>` to `&'tcx List<ty::Binder<ExistentialTraitRef>>`.
This is a first step in moving the `dyn Trait` representation closer to Chalk, which we've talked about in `@rust-lang/wg-traits.`
r? `@nikomatsakis`
bootstrap: update ci-llvm stamp after #80087Fixes#80086.
Unfortunately, #80087 forgot to update the ci-llvm stamp, so the updated ci-llvm tarball with `llvm-dwp` wasn't downloaded by users. This PR updates the ci-llvm stamp to resolve that problem.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
Use more symbols in rustdoc
Builds on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/80044 and should not be merged before.
I want to test if this is actually faster before merging it, there was a lot of `to_string()` calls so I'm not sure it will actually help. That means I have to wait for 80044 to get merged before running perf.
r? `@ghost`
Always run intrinsics lowering pass
Move intrinsics lowering pass from the optimization phase (where it
would not run if -Zmir-opt-level=0), to the drop lowering phase where it
runs unconditionally.
The implementation of those intrinsics in code generation and
interpreter is unnecessary. Remove it.
Unfortunately, #80087 forgot to update the ci-llvm stamp, so the updated
ci-llvm tarball with `llvm-dwp` wasn't downloaded by users. This commit
updates the ci-llvm stamp to resolve that problem.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david@davidtw.co>
The `coverage-reports` tests still generate counters and JSON reports
for inspection, but these files are no longer used in Makefile diffs, to
reduce complexity and confusion from unreliable or unexpected test
results, especially when maintaining them (i.e., generating `--bless`ed
results).
The associated `expected_` files for counters and JSON reports have been
removed, leaving only the files actually used for testing: the `llvm-cov
show` reports.
Add `popcount` and `popcnt` as doc aliases for `count_ones` methods.
Integer types have a `count_ones` method that end up calling `intrinsics::ctpop`. On some architectures, that intrinsic is translated as a corresponding CPU instruction know as "popcount" or "popcnt".
This PR makes it so that searching for those names in rustdoc shows those methods.
CC https://blog.rust-lang.org/2020/11/19/Rust-1.48.html#adding-search-aliases
Fixed conflict with drop elaboration and coverage
See
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/80045#issuecomment-745733339
Coverage statements are moved to the beginning of the BCB. This does
also affect what's counted before a panic, changing some results, but I
think these results may even be preferred? In any case, there are no
guarantees about what's counted when a panic occurs (by design).
r? `@tmandry`
FYI `@wesleywiser` `@ecstatic-morse`
