There is currently not much precedent for target crates requiring syntax
extensions to compile their test versions. This dependency is possible, but
can't be encoded through the normal means of DEPS_regex because it is a
test-only dependency and it must be a *host* dependency (it's a syntax
extension).
Closes#13844
This allows the use of syntax extensions when cross-compiling (fixing #12102). It does this by encoding the target triple in the crate metadata and checking it when searching for files. Currently the crate triple must match the host triple when there is a macro_registrar_fn, it must match the target triple when linking, and can match either when only macro_rules! macros are used.
due to carelessness, this is pretty much a duplicate of https://github.com/mozilla/rust/pull/13450.
This adds the target triple to the crate metadata.
When searching for a crate the phase (link, syntax) is taken into account.
During link phase only crates matching the target triple are considered.
During syntax phase, either the target or host triple will be accepted, unless
the crate defines a macro_registrar, in which case only the host triple will
match.
Instead of passing through CC which may have things like ccache and other
arguments (when using clang) this commit filters out the necessary arguments
from CC to pass the right linker to rustc.
Closes#13562
This is a bit of an interesting upgrade to LLVM. Upstream LLVM has started using C++11 features, so they require a C++11 compiler to build. I've updated all the bots to have a C++11 compiler, and they appear to be building LLVM successfully:
* Linux bots - I added gcc/g++ 4.7 (good enough)
* Android bots - same as the linux ones
* Mac bots - I installed the most recent command line tools for Lion which gives us clang 3.2, but LLVM wouldn't build unless it was explicitly asked to link to `libc++` instead of `libstdc++`. This involved tweaking `mklldeps.py` and the `configure` script to get things to work out
* Windows bots - mingw-w64 has gcc 4.8.1 which is sufficient for building LLVM (hurray!)
* BSD bots - I updated FreeBSD to 10.0 which brought with it a relevant version of clang.
The largest fallout I've seen so far is that the test suite doesn't work at all on FreeBSD 10. We've already stopped gating on FreeBSD due to #13427 (we used to be on freebsd 9), so I don't think this puts us in too bad of a situation. I will continue to attempt to fix FreeBSD and the breakage on there.
The LLVM update brings with it all of the recently upstreamed LLVM patches. We only have one local patch now which is just an optimization, and isn't required to use upstream LLVM. I want to maintain compatibility with LLVM 3.3 and 3.4 while we can, and this upgrade is keeping us up to date with the 3.5 release. Once 3.5 is release we will in theory no longer require a bundled LLVM.
The goal of the snapshot bots is to produce binaries which can run in as many
locations as possible. Currently we build on Centos 6 for this reason, but with
LLVM's update to C++11, this reduces the number of platforms that we could
possibly run on.
This adds a --enable-llvm-static-stdcpp option to the ./configure script for
Rust which will enable building a librustc with a static dependence on
libstdc++. This normally isn't necessary, but this option can be used on the
snapshot builders in order to continue to make binaries which should be able to
run in as many locations as possible.
In the past, windows was installed from stage3 to guarantee convergence between
the host and target artifacts, but syntax extensions on all platforms are
currently relying on convergence, so special casing this one platform has become
less relevant over time.
This will also have the added benefit of dealing with #13474 and #13491. These
issues will be closed after next next nightly is confirmed to fix them.
This is intended to be the first thing somebody new to the language reads about Rust. It is supposed to be simple and intriguing, to give the user an idea of whether Rust is appropriate for them, and to hint that there's a lot of cool stuff to learn if they just keep diving deeper.
I'm particularly happy with the sequence of concurrency examples.
After removing absolute rpaths, cross compile builds (notably the nightly
builders) broke. This is because the RPATH was pointing at an empty directory
because only the rustc binary is copied over, not all of the target libraries.
This modifies the cross compile logic to fixup the rpath of the stage0
cross-compiled rustc to point to where it came from.
Concerns have been raised about using absolute rpaths in #11746, and this is the
first step towards not relying on rpaths at all. The only current use case for
an absolute rpath is when a non-installed rust builds an executable that then
moves from is built location. The relative rpath back to libstd and absolute
rpath to the installation directory still remain (CFG_PREFIX).
Closes#11746
Rebasing of #12754
First, documented the existing `CTEST_DISABLE_$(TEST_GROUP)` pattern
for conditionally disabling tests based on missing host features.
Added variant of above, `CTEST_DISABLE_NONSELFHOST_$(TEST_GROUP)`,
which is only queried in contexts where the target is not on the
CFG_HOST list (which I interpret as the list of targets that our host
can compatibly emulate; e.g. the example that i686 and x86_64 can in
theory run each others' tests).
Driveby fix: Remove redundant copy of
check-stage$(1)-T-$(2)-H-$(3)-$(4)-exec dependency declaration.
These are not installed anywhere, but are included under `./doc` for
those who want an offline copy with their nightlies. This increases the
size of the (compressed) tarball from 76 to 83 MB.
These syntax extensions need a place to be documented, and this starts passing a
`--cfg dox` parameter to `rustdoc` when building and testing documentation in
order to document macros so that they have no effect on the compiled crate, but
only documentation.
Closes#5605
These syntax extensions need a place to be documented, and this starts passing a
`--cfg dox` parameter to `rustdoc` when building and testing documentation in
order to document macros so that they have no effect on the compiled crate, but
only documentation.
Closes#5605
1. Fix a long-standing typo in the makefile: the relevant
CTEST_NAME here is `rpass-full` (with a dash), not
`rpass_full`.
2. The rpass-full tests depend on the complete set of target
libraries. Therefore, the rpass-full tests need to use
the dependencies held in the CSREQ-prefixed variable, not
the TLIBRUSTC_DEFAULT-prefixed variable.
Mac can't actually build our source tarballs because it's `tar`
command doesn't support the --exclude-vcs flag. This is just
a workaround to make our mac nightlies work (we get our source
tarballs from the linux bot).
This performs a few touch-ups to the OSX installer:
* A rust logo is shown during installation
* The installation happens to /usr/local by default (instead of /)
* A new welcome screen is shown that's slightly more relevant
This fixes some problems with
make verify-grammar
llnextgen still reports a lot of errors
FYI: My build directory /my-test/build is different from the source directory /my-test/rust.
cd /my-test/build
/my-test/rust/configure --prefix=/my-test/bin
make
make install
make verify-grammar
This performs a few touch-ups to the OSX installer:
* A rust logo is shown during installation
* The installation happens to /usr/local by default (instead of /)
* A new welcome screen is shown that's slightly more relevant
The previous dependency calculation was based on an arbitrary set of asterisks
at an arbitrary depth, but using the recursive version should be much more
robust in figuring out what's dependent.
When calling
make verify-grammar
rust.md cannot be found, because the
path to rust.md is missing.
The path is set to:
$(D)/rust.md
This can only be tested, when llnextgen is installed.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kobler <eng1@koblersystems.de>
