[Documentation]: Update developer documentation link.
Just noticed the docs links broken. The current doc link was broken. replaced with the updated version as found on the front page. Should the rest of the links be updated?
Being new to Rust I wasn't familiar with this acronym and found it hard to guess (the context of syntax trees biased me to reading it as a D-something Syntax Tree and trying to guess what the D was), hard to google (in retrospect googling "rust dst" does the job, but I thought it was an abstract structure thing, not Rust-specific), and hard to Github-search, because `dst` is commonly short for “destination” in code.
Alternatively `<abbr title="dynamically sized type">DST</abbr>` would be about as helpful.
Some features of rust-analyzer requires support for custom commands on
the client side. Specifically, hover & code lens need this.
Stock LSP doesn't have a way for the server to know which client-side
commands are available. For that reason, we historically were just
sending the commands, not worrying whether the client supports then or
not.
That's not really great though, so in this PR we add infrastructure for
the client to explicitly opt-into custom commands, via `extensions`
field of the ClientCapabilities.
To preserve backwards compatability, if the client doesn't set the
field, we assume that it does support all custom commands. In the
future, we'll start treating that case as if the client doesn't support
commands.
So, if you maintain a rust-analyzer client and implement
`rust-analyzer/runSingle` and such, please also advertise this via a
capability.
9692: Use same cancelled spelling in doc and code. r=matklad a=mattiasgronlund
Right thing might be to update the spelling in the code to
follow American instead of English spelling, that is
using only canceled. But they should at least be aligned.
Co-authored-by: Mattias Grönlund <mattias@gronlund.se>
Right thing might be to update the spelling in the code to
follow American instead of English spelling, that is
using only canceled. But they should at least be aligned.
One source completion can produce up to two lsp completions.
Additionally, `preselct` and `sort_text` are global properties of the
whole set of completions, so the right granularity here is to convert
many completions.
As a side-benefit, we no loger allocate intermediate vec.
* Keep codegen adjacent to the relevant crates.
* Remove codgen deps from xtask, speeding-up from-source installation.
This regresses the release process a bit, as it now needs to run the
tests (and, by extension, compile the code).
9348: output to log file if RA_LOG_FILE is defined in environment r=rezural a=rezural
This adds a check for RA_LOG_FILE, and logs to that if defined. It currently overrides flags.log_file. If this is undesirable, I will add a check.
Co-authored-by: rezural <rezural@protonmail.com>
The new extension allows filtering of workspace symbool lookup
results by search scope or search kind.
Filtering can be configured in 3 different ways:
- The '#' or '*' markers can be added inline with the symbol lookup
query.
The '#' marker means symbols should be looked up in the current
workspace and any dependencies. If not specified, only current
workspace is considered.
The '*' marker means all kinds of symbols should be looked up
(types, functions, etc). If not specified, only type symbols are
returned.
- Each LSP request can take an optional search_scope or search_kind
argument query parameter.
- Finally there are 2 global config options that can be set for all
requests served by the active RA instance.
Add support for setting the global config options to the VSCode
extension.
The extension does not use the per-request way, but it's useful for
other IDEs.
The latest version of VSCode filters out the inline markers, so
currently the only reasonable way to use the new functionality is
via the global config.
* don't feel obliged to quickly review every PR assigned to you
* so that other folks can notify you about interesting PRs without
thinking to much about creating additional work for you
8510: Move cursor position when using item movers r=jonas-schievink a=jonas-schievink
This updates the cursor position when moving items around to stay in the same location within the moved node.
I changed the `moveItem` response to `SnippetTextEdit[]`, since that made more sense to me (the file was ignored by the client anyways, since the edits always apply to the current document). It also matches `onEnter`, which seems logical to me, but please let me know if this doesn't make sense.
There's still a bug in the client-side snippet code that will cause the cursor position to be slightly off when moving parameters in the same line (presumably we don't track the column correctly after deleting `$0`). Not really sure how to fix that immediately, but this PR should already be an improvement despite that bug.
8533: Fix typo in style guide r=jonas-schievink a=jonas-schievink
Fixes bold text rendering
bors r+
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonasschievink@gmail.com>
