The test harness will make sure that the panic message contains the
specified string. This is useful to help make `#[should_fail]` tests a
bit less brittle by decreasing the chance that the test isn't
"accidentally" passing due to a panic occurring earlier than expected.
The behavior is in some ways similar to JUnit's `expected` feature:
`@Test(expected=NullPointerException.class)`.
Without the message assertion, this test would pass even though it's not
actually reaching the intended part of the code:
```rust
#[test]
#[should_fail(message = "out of bounds")]
fn test_oob_array_access() {
let idx: uint = from_str("13o").unwrap(); // oops, this will panic
[1i32, 2, 3][idx];
}
```
Reported as a part of rust-lang/rust#19120
The logic of rust-lang/rust@74fb798a20 was
flawed because when a CI tool run the test parallely with other tasks,
they all belong to a single session family and the test may pick up
irrelevant zombie processes before they are reaped by the CI tool
depending on timing.
Also, panic! inside a loop over all children makes the logic simpler.
By not destructing the return values of Command::spawn() until
find_zombies() finishes, I believe we can conduct a slightly stricter
test.
Signed-off-by: NODA, Kai <nodakai@gmail.com>
Previously, `BufWriter::write` would just return an `std::io::OtherIoError` if someone attempted to write past the end of the wrapped buffer. This pull request changes the error to support partial writes and return a `std::io::ShortWrite`, or an `io::io::EndOfFile` if it's been fully exhausted.
I've also optimized away a bounds check inside `BufWriter::write`, which should help shave off some nanoseconds in an inner loops.
This means that `Fn(&A) -> (&B, &C)` is equivalent to `for<'a> Fn(&'a A)
-> (&'a B, &'a C)` similar to the lifetime elision of lower-case `fn` in
types and declarations.
Closes#18992.
detect UFCS drop and allow UFCS methods to have explicit type parameters.
Work towards #18875.
Since code could previously call the methods & implement the traits
manually, this is a
[breaking-change]
Closes#19586. Closes#19375.
In regards to:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/19253#issuecomment-64836729
This commit:
* Changes the #deriving code so that it generates code that utilizes fewer
reexports (in particur Option::* and Result::*), which is necessary to
remove those reexports in the future
* Changes other areas of the codebase so that fewer reexports are utilized
Add a rustdoc test for union to exhibit how it is used.
There is already a test for union in the test namespace, but this commit
adds a doctest that will appear in the rustdocs.
Add a doctest for the difference function.
Add a doctest for the symmetric_difference function.
Add a doctest for the intersection function.
Update the union et al. doctests based on @Gankro's comments.
Make the union et al. doctests a bit more readable.
Somehow llvm is able to optimize this version of Vec::reserve
into dramatically faster than the old version. In micro-benchmarks
this was 2-10 times faster. It also shaved 14 minutes off of
rust's compile times.
Closes#19281.
- Remove the `for Sized?` bound on `core::ops::FnOnce`, as it takes
`self` by value and can never be implemented by an unsized type.
- Add a missing `Sized?` bound to the blanket `core::ops::FnMut` impl,
as both `Fn` and `FnMut` are `for Sized?`.
Adds the ability to use a custom allocator heap by passing either --cfg
external_crate and --extern external=<allocator_crate_name> or --cfg
external_funcs and defining the allocator functions prefixed by 'rust_'
somewhere.
This is useful for many applications including OS/embedded development,
and allocator development and testing.
Part of #18424
Adds `capacity()` function to VecMap, as per the collections reform.
(Salvaged from #19516, #19523, while we await an RFC regarding `reserve`/`reserve_index` for `VecMap`)
Right now, `DerefMut` is not `for Sized?`, so you can't impl `DerefMut<T> for Foo` where `Foo` is unsized. However, there is no reason that it can't be `for Sized?`, so this pull request fixes the issue.
Closes#19493.
We heavily rely on queries and fragments in the URL structure, so it is desired to preserve them even in the redirects. The generated redirect pages try to preserve them with scripts, which take precedence over the original `Refresh` metadata. Non-scripting browsers would continue to work (with no queries and fragments).
(This in turn solves a number of semi-broken links to the source code, which are actually linked to redirect pages.)
Added the example from [this Reddit thread][1], reworked to be more robust with correct logic (first link skipped the 0th and 1st Fibonacci numbers, second forgot about the last two valid values before overflow). Will yield all Fibonacci numbers sequentially in the range `[0, <u32 as Int>::max_value())`.
If the example is too complicated I can change it to a more naive version, perhaps using signed integers to check for overflow instead of `Option` and `.checked_add()`.
Also reworded the doc comments to clarify the usage and behavior of `Unfold`, as the thread suggested that it wasn't really clear how `Unfold` worked and when one should use it.
This change is in the `core` crate but I based the example on `std` since that's where most readers will find the example. I included a note about `core` for clarity. Edit: removed.
Tested with `rustdoc src/libcore/lib.rs`. Rebased against latest master as of the creation of this PR.
[1]: http://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/2ny8r1/a_question_about_loops/cmighu4?context=10000
This series of commits deals with broken links to the source code. It also refactors some repetitive codes from Rustdoc. The most important commit, 1cb1f00d40, describes the rationale; this will fix a half of #16289. Other commits are reasonably independent to each other and can be made into indiviudal PRs at the request.
### Notes on the broken source links
As of bda97e8557 (I've used this to check the PR works as intended), there are 281 (!) such broken links. They can be further classified as follows:
* 178 links to incorrect item types. This is the first half of #16289, and this PR fixes all of them.
* 89 links to redirect pages. They are not technically "broken" but still doesn't give a source code. I have a fix for this in mind, which would make a redirect page slightly *fat*.
* 14 links to incorrect `DefId` in the `gotosrc` parameter. This is #15309, and affects many `liballoc` reexports in `libstd` but *nothing else* (curiously). I'm yet to track this down; might be a metadata bug (not sure).
* 0 links to the crate reexported as a different name. This is the second half of #16289, and seems not hard to fix but I'm running out of time.
Prevalence of this kind of bugs calls for a full link verifier integrated into the testing process. :S
