Last LLVM update seems to have fixed whatever prevented LLVM integrated assembler from generating correct unwind tables on Windows. This PR switches Windows builds to use internal assembler by default.
Compilation via external assembler can still be requested via the newly added `-Z no-integrated-as` option.
Closes#8809
Previously something like
struct NotEq;
#[deriving(Eq)]
struct Error {
foo: NotEq
}
would just point to the `foo` field, with no mention of the
`deriving(Eq)`. With this patch, the compiler creates a note saying "in
expansion of #[deriving(Eq)]" pointing to the Eq.
(includes some cleanup/preparation; the commit view might be nicer, to filter out the noise of the first one.)
In order to keep up to date with changes to the libraries that `llvm-config`
spits out, the dependencies to the LLVM are a dynamically generated rust file.
This file is now automatically updated whenever LLVM is updated to get kept
up-to-date.
At the same time, this cleans out some old cruft which isn't necessary in the
makefiles in terms of dependencies.
Closes#10745Closes#10744
This upgrades LLVM in order to make progress on #10708, and it's also been awhile since we last upgraded!
The contentious point of this upgrade is that all JIT support has been removed because LLVM is changing it and we're not keeping up with it.
The main one removed is rust_upcall_reset_stack_limit (continuation of #10156),
and this also removes the upcall_trace function. The was hidden behind a
`-Z trace` flag, but if you attempt to use this now you'll get a linker error
because there is no implementation of the 'upcall_trace' function. Due to this
no longer working, I decided to remove it entirely from the compiler (I'm also a
little unsure on what it did in the first place).
Make trait lifetime parameters early bound in static fn type. Reasoning for this change is (hopefully) explained well enough in the comment, so I'll not duplicate it here. Fixes#10391.
r? @pnkfelix
LLVM's JIT has been updated numerous times, and we haven't been tracking it at
all. The existing LLVM glue code no longer compiles, and the JIT isn't used for
anything currently.
This also rebases out the FixedStackSegment support which we have added to LLVM.
None of this is still in use by the compiler, and there's no need to keep this
functionality around inside of LLVM.
This is needed to unblock #10708 (where we're tripping an LLVM assertion).
This reverts commit c54427ddfbbab41a39d14f2b1dc4f080cbc2d41b.
Leave the #[ignores] in that were added to rustpkg tests.
Conflicts:
src/librustc/driver/driver.rs
src/librustc/metadata/creader.rs
This function had type &[u8] -> ~str, i.e. it allocates a string
internally, even though the non-allocating version that take &[u8] ->
&str and ~[u8] -> ~str are all that is necessary in most circumstances.
This function had type &[u8] -> ~str, i.e. it allocates a string
internally, even though the non-allocating version that take &[u8] ->
&str and ~[u8] -> ~str are all that is necessary in most circumstances.
This registers new snapshots after the landing of #10528, and then goes on to tweak the build process to build a monolithic `rustc` binary for use in future snapshots. This mainly involved dropping the dynamic dependency on `librustllvm`, so that's now built as a static library (with a dynamically generated rust file listing LLVM dependencies).
This currently doesn't actually make the snapshot any smaller (24MB => 23MB), but I noticed that the executable has 11MB of metadata so once progress is made on #10740 we should have a much smaller snapshot.
There's not really a super-compelling reason to distribute just a binary because we have all the infrastructure for dealing with a directory structure, but to me it seems "more correct" that a snapshot compiler is just a `rustc` binary.
I've renamed `MutableVector::mut_split(at)` to `MutableVector::mut_split_at(at)` to be coherent with ImmutableVector. As specified in the commit log, The `size_hint` method is not optimal because of #9629.
* Don't flag any address_insignificant statics as reachable because the whole
point of the address_insignificant optimization is that the static is not
reachable. Additionally, there's no need for it to be reachable because LLVM
optimizes it away.
* Be sure to not leak external node ids into our reachable set, this can
spuriously cause local items to be considered reachable if the node ids just
happen to line up
This is inspired by a mystifying linker failure when using `pkg-config` to
generate the linker args: `pkg-config` produces output that ends in a
space, thus resulting in an empty linker argument.
Also added some updates to the concerning error messages that helped
spotting this bug.
**Note**: I only tested on top of my #10670 PR, size reductions come from both change sets.
With this, [more enums are shrinked](https://gist.github.com/eddyb/08fef0dfc6ff54e890bc), the most significant one being `ast_node`, from 104 bytes (master) to 96 (#10670) and now to 32 bytes.
My own testcase requires **200MB** less when compiling (not including the other **200MB** gained in #10670), and rustc-stage2 is down by about **130MB**.
I believe there is more to gain by fiddling with the enums' layouts.
This adds support to link to OSX frameworks via the new link attribute when
using `kind = "framework"`. It is a compiler error to request linkage to a
framework when the target is not macos because other platforms don't support
frameworks.
Closes#2023
In this series of commits, I've implemented static linking for rust. The scheme I implemented was the same as my [mailing list post](https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/rust-dev/2013-November/006686.html).
The commits have more details to the nitty gritty of what went on. I've rebased this on top of my native mutex pull request (#10479), but I imagine that it will land before this lands, I just wanted to pre-emptively get all the rebase conflicts out of the way (becuase this is reorganizing building librustrt as well).
Some contentious points I want to make sure are all good:
* I've added more "compiler chooses a default" behavior than I would like, I want to make sure that this is all very clearly outlined in the code, and if not I would like to remove behavior or make it clearer.
* I want to make sure that the new "fancy suite" tests are ok (using make/python instead of another rust crate)
If we do indeed pursue this, I would be more than willing to write up a document describing how linking in rust works. I believe that this behavior should be very understandable, and the compiler should never hinder someone just because linking is a little fuzzy.
