Reimplement C-str literals
This reverts #113334, cc `@fmease.`
While converting lexer tokens to ast Tokens in `rustc_parse`, we check the edition of the span of the token. If the edition < 2021, we split the token into two, one being the identifier and other being the str literal.
The warning can be reproduced with 1.63 but not with 1.64.
$ rustc +1.63 tests/ui/lint/unused/const-local-var.rs
warning: constant `F` is never used
--> tests/ui/lint/unused/const-local-var.rs:14:9
|
14 | const F: i32 = 2;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: `#[warn(dead_code)]` on by default
$ rustc +1.64 tests/ui/lint/unused/const-local-var.rs
Add a regression test to prevent the problem from re-appearing.
If a raw string was used in the `env!` invocation, then it should also
be shown in the diagnostic messages as a raw string.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david@davidtw.co>
Remove Gha status emitter in compile-test
Disables the github specific output for now since it can be a bit confusing - https://github.com/oli-obk/ui_test/issues/109, in particular the truncation/repetition
r? `@flip1995`
changelog: none
fix(resolve): skip panic when resolution is dummy
Fixes#113953
Skip the panic when the binding refers to a dummy node during the finalization.
r? `@petrochenkov`
Add `x86_64-unikraft-linux-musl` target
This introduces `x86_64-unikraft-linux-musl` as the first Rust target for the [Unikraft] Unikernel Development Kit.
[Unikraft]: https://unikraft.org/
Unikraft imitates Linux and uses musl as libc.
It is extremely configurable, and does not even provide a `poll` implementation or a network stack, unless enabled by the end user who compiles the application.
Our approach for integrating the build process with `rustc` is to hide the build process as well as the actual final linking step behind a linker-shim (`kraftld`, see https://github.com/unikraft/kraftkit/issues/612).
## Tier 3 target policy
> - A tier 3 target must have a designated developer or developers (the "target
> maintainers") on record to be CCed when issues arise regarding the target.
> (The mechanism to track and CC such developers may evolve over time.)
I will be the target maintainer.
> - Targets must use naming consistent with any existing targets; for instance, a
> target for the same CPU or OS as an existing Rust target should use the same
> name for that CPU or OS. Targets should normally use the same names and
> naming conventions as used elsewhere in the broader ecosystem beyond Rust
> (such as in other toolchains), unless they have a very good reason to
> diverge. Changing the name of a target can be highly disruptive, especially
> once the target reaches a higher tier, so getting the name right is important
> even for a tier 3 target.
> - Target names should not introduce undue confusion or ambiguity unless
> absolutely necessary to maintain ecosystem compatibility. For example, if
> the name of the target makes people extremely likely to form incorrect
> beliefs about what it targets, the name should be changed or augmented to
> disambiguate it.
> - If possible, use only letters, numbers, dashes and underscores for the name.
> Periods (`.`) are known to cause issues in Cargo.
The target name `x86_64-unikraft-linux-musl` was derived from `x86_64-unknown-linux-musl`, setting Unikraft as vendor.
Unikraft exactly imitates Linux + musl.
> - Tier 3 targets may have unusual requirements to build or use, but must not
> create legal issues or impose onerous legal terms for the Rust project or for
> Rust developers or users.
> - The target must not introduce license incompatibilities.
> - Anything added to the Rust repository must be under the standard Rust
> license (`MIT OR Apache-2.0`).
> - The target must not cause the Rust tools or libraries built for any other
> host (even when supporting cross-compilation to the target) to depend
> on any new dependency less permissive than the Rust licensing policy. This
> applies whether the dependency is a Rust crate that would require adding
> new license exceptions (as specified by the `tidy` tool in the
> rust-lang/rust repository), or whether the dependency is a native library
> or binary. In other words, the introduction of the target must not cause a
> user installing or running a version of Rust or the Rust tools to be
> subject to any new license requirements.
> - Compiling, linking, and emitting functional binaries, libraries, or other
> code for the target (whether hosted on the target itself or cross-compiling
> from another target) must not depend on proprietary (non-FOSS) libraries.
> Host tools built for the target itself may depend on the ordinary runtime
> libraries supplied by the platform and commonly used by other applications
> built for the target, but those libraries must not be required for code
> generation for the target; cross-compilation to the target must not require
> such libraries at all. For instance, `rustc` built for the target may
> depend on a common proprietary C runtime library or console output library,
> but must not depend on a proprietary code generation library or code
> optimization library. Rust's license permits such combinations, but the
> Rust project has no interest in maintaining such combinations within the
> scope of Rust itself, even at tier 3.
> - "onerous" here is an intentionally subjective term. At a minimum, "onerous"
> legal/licensing terms include but are *not* limited to: non-disclosure
> requirements, non-compete requirements, contributor license agreements
> (CLAs) or equivalent, "non-commercial"/"research-only"/etc terms,
> requirements conditional on the employer or employment of any particular
> Rust developers, revocable terms, any requirements that create liability
> for the Rust project or its developers or users, or any requirements that
> adversely affect the livelihood or prospects of the Rust project or its
> developers or users.
No dependencies were added to Rust.
Requirements for linking are [Unikraft] and [KraftKit] (both BSD-3-Clause), but none of these are added to Rust.
[KraftKit]: https://github.com/unikraft/kraftkit
> - Neither this policy nor any decisions made regarding targets shall create any
> binding agreement or estoppel by any party. If any member of an approving
> Rust team serves as one of the maintainers of a target, or has any legal or
> employment requirement (explicit or implicit) that might affect their
> decisions regarding a target, they must recuse themselves from any approval
> decisions regarding the target's tier status, though they may otherwise
> participate in discussions.
> - This requirement does not prevent part or all of this policy from being
> cited in an explicit contract or work agreement (e.g. to implement or
> maintain support for a target). This requirement exists to ensure that a
> developer or team responsible for reviewing and approving a target does not
> face any legal threats or obligations that would prevent them from freely
> exercising their judgment in such approval, even if such judgment involves
> subjective matters or goes beyond the letter of these requirements.
Understood.
I am not a member of a Rust team.
> - Tier 3 targets should attempt to implement as much of the standard libraries
> as possible and appropriate (`core` for most targets, `alloc` for targets
> that can support dynamic memory allocation, `std` for targets with an
> operating system or equivalent layer of system-provided functionality), but
> may leave some code unimplemented (either unavailable or stubbed out as
> appropriate), whether because the target makes it impossible to implement or
> challenging to implement. The authors of pull requests are not obligated to
> avoid calling any portions of the standard library on the basis of a tier 3
> target not implementing those portions.
Understood.
`std` is supported.
> - The target must provide documentation for the Rust community explaining how
> to build for the target, using cross-compilation if possible. If the target
> supports running binaries, or running tests (even if they do not pass), the
> documentation must explain how to run such binaries or tests for the target,
> using emulation if possible or dedicated hardware if necessary.
Building is described in the platform support doc.
It will be updated once proper `kraftld` support has landed.
> - Tier 3 targets must not impose burden on the authors of pull requests, or
> other developers in the community, to maintain the target. In particular,
> do not post comments (automated or manual) on a PR that derail or suggest a
> block on the PR based on a tier 3 target. Do not send automated messages or
> notifications (via any medium, including via ``@`)` to a PR author or others
> involved with a PR regarding a tier 3 target, unless they have opted into
> such messages.
> - Backlinks such as those generated by the issue/PR tracker when linking to
> an issue or PR are not considered a violation of this policy, within
> reason. However, such messages (even on a separate repository) must not
> generate notifications to anyone involved with a PR who has not requested
> such notifications.
Understood.
> - Patches adding or updating tier 3 targets must not break any existing tier 2
> or tier 1 target, and must not knowingly break another tier 3 target without
> approval of either the compiler team or the maintainers of the other tier 3
> target.
> - In particular, this may come up when working on closely related targets,
> such as variations of the same architecture with different features. Avoid
> introducing unconditional uses of features that another variation of the
> target may not have; use conditional compilation or runtime detection, as
> appropriate, to let each target run code supported by that target.
I don't think this PR breaks anything.
r? compiler-team
CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME is defined on a cross build if the target is
recognized. Without this explicit definition cmake will assume that
we're building for the host platform which can bring in unwanted
compiler and linker flags.
Also, add a warning on cross builds with unknown target to aid in
cross builds for future platforms.
fix intra-doc links on nested `use` and `extern crate` items
This PR fixes two rustdoc ICEs that happen if there are any intra-doc links on nested `use` or `extern crate` items, for example:
```rust
/// Re-export [`fmt`] and [`io`].
pub use std::{fmt, io}; // "nested" use = use with braces
/// Re-export [`std`].
pub extern crate std;
```
Nested use items were incorrectly considered private and therefore didn't have their intra-doc links resolved. I fixed this by always resolving intra-doc links for nested `use` items that are declared `pub`.
<details>
During AST->HIR lowering, nested `use` items are desugared like this:
```rust
pub use std::{}; // "list stem"
pub use std::fmt;
pub use std::io;
```
Each of these HIR nodes has it's own effective visibility and the list stem is always considered private.
To check the effective visibility of an AST node, the AST node is mapped to a HIR node with `Resolver::local_def_id`, which returns the (private) list stem for nested use items.
</details>
For `extern crate`, there was a hack in rustdoc that stored the `DefId` of the crate itself in the cleaned item, instead of the `DefId` of the `extern crate` item. This made rustdoc look at the resolved links of the extern crate's crate root instead of the `extern crate` item. I've removed this hack and instead translate the `DefId` in the appropriate places.
As as side effect of fixing `extern crate`, i've turned
```rust
#[doc(masked)]
extern crate self as _;
```
into a no-op instead of hiding all trait impls. Proper verification for `doc(masked)` is included as a bonus.
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/113896
[`needless_pass_by_ref_mut`]: Do not lint if passed as a fn-like argument
Fixes#11182 and also fixes#11199 (though this is kind of a duplicate)
There's likely a case or two I've missed, so this likely needs a bit more work but it seems to work fine with the tests I've added.
PS, the diff for the test is useless because it iterates over a hashmap before linting. Seems to work fine but we could maybe change this for consistency's sake
changelog: [`needless_pass_by_ref_mut`]: No longer lints if the function is passed as a fn-like argument
delete [allow(unused_unsafe)] from issue #74838
While looking into issue #111288 I noticed the following `#[allow(...)]` with a `FIXME` asking for it to be removed. Deleting the `#[allow(...)]` does not seem to break anything, it seems like the lint has been updated for unsafe blocks in macros?
Add #[inline] to core debug assertion helpers
These functions are called a lot and not inlined by default in a dev compiler. Adding `#[inline]` should improve things in a dev workflow and be irrelevant in the distributed library.
lint/ctypes: only try normalize
Fixes#113900.
Now that this lint runs on any external-ABI fn-ptr, normalization won't always succeed, so use `try_normalize_erasing_regions` instead.
Optimize format usage
Per #112156, using `&` in `format!` may cause a small perf delay, so I tried to clean up one module at a time format usage. This PR includes a few removals of the ref in format (they do compile locally without the ref), as well as a few format inlining for consistency.
Optimize format usage
Per #112156, using `&` in `format!` may cause a small perf delay, so I tried to clean up one module at a time format usage. This PR includes a few removals of the ref in format (they do compile locally without the ref), as well as a few format inlining for consistency.
