Output column number info when panicking
Outputs the column number when panicking. Useful when you e.g. have code like `foo[i] = bar[k] + bar[l]` and you get a panic with index out of bounds, or when you have an expression like `a = b + c + d + e` and the addition overflows. Now you know which operation to blame!
The format is `file:line:column`, just like for compiler errors. Example output with the patch:
```
thread 'main' panicked at 'index out of bounds: the len is 5 but the index is 8', src/main.rs:3:8
```
As some of the API between the compiler and the library landscape gets broken, this is a bit hackier than I'd originally wanted it to be.
* `panic` and `panic_bounds_check` lang items got an additional column param, on stage0 I still have to use the previous version. After a SNAP this should be resolved.
* For `#[derive(RustcDeserialze)]`, stage0 requires a fixed signature for `std::rt::begin_panic`, so we can't change it right away. What we need to do instead is to keep the signature, and add a `begin_panic_new` function that we use in later stages instead. After a SNAP we can change the `begin_panic` function and rely on it instead of `begin_panic_new`, and one SNAP later we can remove `begin_panic_new`.
* Fortunately I didn't have to break anything about the panic hook API, I could easily extend it.
Note that debuginfo remains unchanged, so RUST_BACKTRACE output won't contain any column info. See issue #42921 for discussion on including the column in debuginfo.
report the total number of errors on compilation failure
Prior to this PR, when we aborted because a "critical pass" failed, we displayed the number of errors from that critical pass. While that's the number of errors that caused compilation to abort in *that place*, that's not what people really want to know. Instead, always report the total number of errors, and don't bother to track the number of errors from the last pass that failed.
This changes the compiler driver API to handle errors more smoothly, therefore is a compiler-api-[breaking-change].
Fixes#42793.
r? @eddyb
Prior to this PR, when we aborted because a "critical pass" failed, we
displayed the number of errors from that critical pass. While that's the
number of errors that caused compilation to abort in *that place*,
that's not what people really want to know. Instead, always report the
total number of errors, and don't bother to track the number of errors
from the last pass that failed.
This changes the compiler driver API to handle errors more smoothly,
and therefore is a compiler-api-[breaking-change].
Fixes#42793.
bootstrap: Fix all the pep-8 issues reported by flake8
This commit also adds a few missing docstrings.
Today, after reading this [article](https://blog.rust-lang.org/2017/06/27/Increasing-Rusts-Reach.html), I downloaded this project and started building from source. In the meantime, I began to read the `bootstrap.py`, to know more about the building process, and I made a few changes, this is my first contribution to the project, hope you like it.
BTW, I have a few doubts about the `bootstrap.py`, any guidance is more than welcome:
* Where can I find the unit tests for this script? In case it doesn't exist yet, do you like to include some unit tests with pytest?
* Some methods like `fix_executable`, `get_string`, and `exe_suffix` in the `RustBuild` class should be converted to a function because it doesn't use `self` anywhere. What do you think?
Improve tests and benchmarks for slice::sort and slice::sort_unstable
This PR just hardens the tests and improves benchmarks.
More specifically:
1. Benchmarks don't generate vectors in `Bencher::iter` loops, but simply clone pregenerated vectors.
2. Benchmark `*_strings` doesn't allocate Strings in `Bencher::iter` loops, but merely clones a `Vec<&str>`.
3. Benchmarks use seeded `XorShiftRng` to be more consistent.
4. Additional tests for `slice::sort` are added, which test sorting on slices with several ascending/descending runs. The implementation identifies such runs so it's a good idea to test that scenario a bit.
5. More checks are added to `run-pass/vector-sort-panic-safe.rs`. Sort algorithms copy elements around a lot (merge sort uses an auxilliary buffer and pdqsort copies the pivot onto the stack before partitioning, then writes it back into the slice). If elements that are being sorted are internally mutable and comparison function mutates them, it is important to make sure that sort algorithms always use the latest "versions" of elements. New checks verify that this is true for both `slice::sort` and `slice::sort_unstable`.
As a side note, all of those improvements were made as part of the parallel sorts PR in Rayon (nikomatsakis/rayon#379) and now I'm backporting them into libcore/libstd.
r? @alexcrichton
When writing LLVM IR output demangled fn name in comments
`--emit=llvm-ir` looks like this now:
```
; <alloc::vec::Vec<T> as core::ops::index::IndexMut<core::ops::range::RangeFull>>::index_mut
; Function Attrs: inlinehint uwtable
define internal { i8*, i64 } @"_ZN106_$LT$alloc..vec..Vec$LT$T$GT$$u20$as$u20$core..ops..index..IndexMut$LT$core..ops..range..RangeFull$GT$$GT$9index_mut17h7f7b576609f30262E"(%"alloc::vec::Vec<u8>"* dereferenceable(24)) unnamed_addr #0 {
start:
...
```
cc https://github.com/integer32llc/rust-playground/issues/15
fixed some clippy warnings in compiletest
This is mainly readability stuff. Whenever the `clone_ref` lint asked me to clone the dereferenced object, I removed the `.clone()` instead, relying on the fact that it has worked so far and the immutable borrow ensures that the value won't change.
rustc_llvm: re-run build script when env var LLVM_CONFIG changes
This removes the changes done in #42429 and use the newly introduced `cargo:rerun-if-env-changed` in https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/pull/4125.
As `LLVM_CONFIG` env var points to the `llvm-config` and changes when it gets configured in `config.toml` or removed from it, we can re-run the build script if this env var changes.
closes#42444
r? @alexcrichton
Document possible `io::ErrorKind`s of `fs::open`
Try to make clear that this isn't an API guarantee for now, as we likely
want to refine these errors in the future, e.g. `ENOSPC` "No space left
on device".
CC #40322
Adding diagnostic code 0611 for lifetime errors with one named, one anonymous lifetime parameter
This is a fix for #42517
Note that this only handles the above case for **function declarations** and **traits**.
`impl items` and `closures` will be handled in a later PR.
Example
```
fn foo<'a>(x: &i32, y: &'a i32) -> &'a i32 {
if x > y { x } else { y }
}
```
now displays the following error message. ui tests have been added for the same.
```
error[E0611]: explicit lifetime required in the type of `x`
11 | fn foo<'a>(x: &i32, y: &'a i32) -> &'a i32 {
| ^ consider changing the type of `x` to `&'a i32`
12 | if x > y { x } else { y }
| - lifetime `'a` required
```
#42516
r? @nikomatsakis
mem_categorization: handle type-based paths in variant patterns
These can't be used in correct programs, but must be handled in order to
prevent ICEs.
Fixes#42880.
r? @eddyb
Coerce fields to the expected field type
Fully fixes#31260.
This needs a crater run. I was supposed to do this last month but it slipped. Let's get this done.
Add `Iterator::for_each`
This works like a `for` loop in functional style, applying a closure to
every item in the `Iterator`. It doesn't allow `break`/`continue` like
a `for` loop, nor any other control flow outside the closure, but it may
be a more legible style for tying up the end of a long iterator chain.
This was tried before in #14911, but nobody made the case for using it
with longer iterators. There was also `Iterator::advance` at that time
which was more capable than `for_each`, but that no longer exists.
The `itertools` crate has `Itertools::foreach` with the same behavior,
but thankfully the names won't collide. The `rayon` crate also has a
`ParallelIterator::for_each` where simple `for` loops aren't possible.
> I really wish we had `for_each` on seq iterators. Having to use a
> dummy operation is annoying. - [@nikomatsakis][1]
[1]: https://github.com/nikomatsakis/rayon/pull/367#issuecomment-308455185
Rebase LLVM on top of LLVM 4.0.1
Fixes#42893.
Please don't backport this to beta as-is - I'm not sure I want rust-lang/llvm#84 to sneak to beta before it gets sufficient testing.
r? @alexcrichton
