Mark defaulted `PartialEq`/`PartialOrd` methods as const
WIthout it, `const` impls of these traits are unpleasant to write. I think this kind of change is allowed now. although it looks like it might require some Miri tweaks. Let's find out.
r? ```@fee1-dead```
Do array-slice equality via array equality, rather than always via slices
~~Draft because it needs a rebase after #91766 eventually gets through bors.~~
This enables the optimizations from #85828 to be used for array-to-slice comparisons too, not just array-to-array.
For example, <https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=release&edition=2021&gist=5f9ba69b3d5825a782f897c830d3a6aa>
```rust
pub fn demo(x: &[u8], y: [u8; 4]) -> bool {
*x == y
}
```
Currently writes the array to stack for no reason:
```nasm
sub rsp, 4
mov dword ptr [rsp], edx
cmp rsi, 4
jne .LBB0_1
mov eax, dword ptr [rdi]
cmp eax, dword ptr [rsp]
sete al
add rsp, 4
ret
.LBB0_1:
xor eax, eax
add rsp, 4
ret
```
Whereas with the change in this PR it just compares it directly:
```nasm
cmp rsi, 4
jne .LBB1_1
cmp dword ptr [rdi], edx
sete al
ret
.LBB1_1:
xor eax, eax
ret
```
Add `io::Error::other`
This PR adds a small utility constructor, `io::Error::other`, a shorthand for `io::Error::new(io::ErrorKind::Other, err)`, something I find myself writing often.
For some concrete stats, a quick search on [grep.app](https://grep.app) shows that more than half of the uses of `io::Error::new` use `ErrorKind::Other`:
```
Error::new\((?:std::)?(?:io::)?ErrorKind:: => 3,898 results
Error::new\((?:std::)?(?:io::)?ErrorKind::Other => 2,186 results
```
Most of these problems originate in use of get_unchecked_mut.
When calling ptr::copy_nonoverlapping, using get_unchecked_mut for both
arguments causes the borrow created to make the second pointer to invalid the
first.
The pairs of identical MaybeUninit::slice_as_mut_ptr calls similarly
invalidate each other.
There was also a similar borrow invalidation problem with the use of
slice::get_unchecked_mut to derive the pointer for the CopyOnDrop.
link to pref_align_of tracking issue
If we are not going to remove this intrinsic (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/90877), I think we should at least have a place to centralize discussion around it, so here we go. Intrinsics don't have their own separate features and usually we instead use the public method for tracking it, but this one does not have such a method... so the tracking issue is just a regular link. (And then we sue it for the const part as well.)
update stdarch
2 commits in d219ad63c5075098fc224a57deb4852b9734327d..0716b22e902207efabe46879cbf28d0189ab7924
2021-12-9 23:50:37 +0000 to 2021-12-14 16:17:57 +0100
* Fix a bunch of typos ([Fix a bunch of typos stdarch#1267](https://github.com/rust-lang/stdarch/pull/1267))
* Stabilize armv8 neon instruction set on aarch64 ([Stabilize armv8 neon instruction set on aarch64 stdarch#1266](https://github.com/rust-lang/stdarch/pull/1266))
The update stabilizes armv8 neon instructions on aarch64. #90972
Constify `bool::then{,_some}`
Note on `~const Drop`: it has no effect when called from runtime functions, when called from const contexts, the trait system ensures that the type can be dropped in const contexts.
Removed `in_band_lifetimes` from `library\proc_macro`
Issue [#91867](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/91867)
This is my first try, I followed the instructions given. Fixed all the errors that were thrown while compiling.
Compiled with stage 0,1, and 2 all of them compiled successfully.
Add `[T]::as_simd(_mut)`
SIMD-style optimizations are the most common use for `[T]::align_to(_mut)`, but that's `unsafe`. So these are *safe* wrappers around it, now that we have the `Simd` type available, to make it easier to use.
```rust
impl [T] {
pub fn as_simd<const LANES: usize>(&self) -> (&[T], &[Simd<T, LANES>], &[T]);
pub fn as_simd_mut<const LANES: usize>(&mut self) -> (&mut [T], &mut [Simd<T, LANES>], &mut [T]);
}
```
They're `cfg`'d out for miri because the `simd` module as a whole is unavailable there.
Readd track_caller to Result::from_residual
This is a followup on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/87401 in and an attempt to move the issue towards resolution.
As part of the overhaul of the Try trait we removed the ability for errors to grab location information during propagation via `?` with the builtin `std::result::Result`. The previously linked issue has a fair bit of discussion into the reasons for and against the usage of `#[track_caller]` on the `FromResidual` impl on `Result` that I will do my best to summarize.
---
### For
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/87401#issuecomment-915053533: Difficulties with using non `std::result::Result` like types
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/87401#issuecomment-978355102: Inconsistency with functionality provided for recoverable (Result) and non-recoverable errors (panic), where panic provides a location and Result does not, pushing some users towards using panic
### Against
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/84277#issuecomment-885322833: concern that this will bloat callers that never use this data
---
Personally, I want to quantify the performance / bloat impact of re-adding this attribute, and fully evaluate the pros and cons before deciding if I need to switch `eyre` to have a custom `Result` type, which would also mean I need `try_trait_v2` to be stabilized, cc `@scottmcm.` If the performance impact is minor enough in the general case I think I would prefer that the default `Result` type has the ability to track location information for consistency with `panic` error reporting, and leave it to applications that need particularly high performance to handle the micro optimizations of introducing their own efficient custom Result type or matching manually.
Alternatively, I wonder if the performance penalty on code that doesn't use the location information on `FromResidual` could be mitigated via new optimizations.
Stabilize `iter::zip`
Hello all!
As the tracking issue (#83574) for `iter::zip` completed the final commenting period without any concerns being raised, I hereby submit this stabilization PR on the issue.
As the pull request that introduced the feature (#82917) states, the `iter::zip` function is a shorter way to zip two iterators. As it's generally a quality-of-life/ergonomic improvement, it has been integrated into the codebase without any trouble, and has been
used in many places across the rust compiler and standard library since March without any issues.
For more details, I would refer to `@cuviper's` original PR, or the [function's documentation](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/iter/fn.zip.html).
Tweak errors coming from `for`-loop, `?` and `.await` desugaring
* Suggest removal of `.await` on non-`Future` expression
* Keep track of obligations introduced by desugaring
* Remove span pointing at method for obligation errors coming from desugaring
* Point at called local sync `fn` and suggest making it `async`
```
error[E0277]: `()` is not a future
--> $DIR/unnecessary-await.rs:9:10
|
LL | boo().await;
| -----^^^^^^ `()` is not a future
| |
| this call returns `()`
|
= help: the trait `Future` is not implemented for `()`
help: do not `.await` the expression
|
LL - boo().await;
LL + boo();
|
help: alternatively, consider making `fn boo` asynchronous
|
LL | async fn boo () {}
| +++++
```
Fix#66731.
Stabilize asm! and global_asm!
Tracking issue: #72016
It's been almost 2 years since the original [RFC](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2850) was posted and we're finally ready to stabilize this feature!
The main changes in this PR are:
- Removing `asm!` and `global_asm!` from the prelude as per the decision in #87228.
- Stabilizing the `asm` and `global_asm` features.
- Removing the unstable book pages for `asm` and `global_asm`. The contents are moved to the [reference](https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1105) and [rust by example](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-by-example/pull/1483).
- All links to these pages have been removed to satisfy the link checker. In a later PR these will be replaced with links to the reference or rust by example.
- Removing the automatic suggestion for using `llvm_asm!` instead of `asm!` if you're still using the old syntax, since it doesn't work anymore with `asm!` no longer being in the prelude. This only affects code that predates the old LLVM-style `asm!` being renamed to `llvm_asm!`.
- Updating `stdarch` and `compiler-builtins`.
- Updating all the tests.
r? `@joshtriplett`
This'll still go via slices eventually for large arrays, but this way slice comparisons to short arrays can use the same memcmp-avoidance tricks.
Added some tests for all the combinations to make sure I didn't accidentally infinitely-recurse something.
Make split_inclusive() on an empty slice yield an empty output
`[].split_inclusive()` currently yields a single, empty slice. That's
different from `"".split_inslusive()`, which yields no output at
all. I think that makes the slice version harder to use.
The case where I ran into this bug was when writing code for
generating a diff between two slices of bytes. I wanted to prefix
removed lines with "-" and a added lines with "+". Due to
`split_inclusive()`'s current behavior, that means that my code prints
just a "-" or "+" for empty files. I suspect most existing callers
have similar "bugs" (which would be fixed by this patch).
Closes#89716.
