rustc_metadata: Encode list of all crate's traits into metadata
While working on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/88679 I noticed that rustdoc is casually doing something quite expensive, something that is used only for error reporting in rustc - collecting all traits from all crates in the dependency tree.
This PR trades some minor extra time spent by metadata encoder in rustc for major gains for rustdoc (and for rustc runs with errors, which execute the `all_traits` query for better diagnostics).
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #92075 (rustdoc: Only special case struct fields for intra-doc links, not enum variants)
- #92118 (Parse and suggest moving where clauses after equals for type aliases)
- #92237 (Visit expressions in-order when resolving pattern bindings)
- #92340 (rustdoc: Start cleaning up search index generation)
- #92351 (Add long error explanation for E0227)
- #92371 (Remove pretty printer space inside block with only outer attrs)
- #92372 (Print space after formal generic params in fn type)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Print space after formal generic params in fn type
Follow-up to #92238 fixing one of the FIXMEs.
```rust
macro_rules! repro {
($ty:ty) => {
stringify!($ty)
};
}
fn main() {
println!("{}", repro!(for<'a> fn(&'a u8)));
}
```
Before: `for<'a>fn(&'a u8)`
After: `for<'a> fn(&'a u8)`
The pretty printer's `print_formal_generic_params` already prints formal generic params correctly with a space, we just need to call it when printing BareFn types instead of reimplementing the printing incorrectly without a space.
83b15bfe1c/compiler/rustc_ast_pretty/src/pprust/state.rs (L1394-L1400)
Visit expressions in-order when resolving pattern bindings
[edited:] Visit the pattern's sub-expressions before defining any bindings.
Otherwise, we might get into a case where a Lit/Range expression in a pattern has a qpath pointing to a Ident pattern that is defined after it, causing an ICE when lowering to HIR. I have a more detailed explanation in the issue linked.
Fixes#92100
Parse and suggest moving where clauses after equals for type aliases
~Mostly the same as #90076, but doesn't make any syntax changes.~ Whether or not we want to land the syntax changes, we should parse the invalid where clause position and suggest moving.
r? `@nikomatsakis`
cc `@petrochenkov` you might have thoughts on implementation
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #92076 (Ignore other `PredicateKind`s in rustdoc auto trait finder)
- #92219 (Remove VCVARS_BAT)
- #92238 (Add a test suite for stringify macro)
- #92330 (Add myself to .mailmap)
- #92333 (Tighten span when suggesting lifetime on path)
- #92335 (Document units for `std::column`)
- #92344 (⬆️ rust-analyzer)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Tighten span when suggesting lifetime on path
This is kind of a hack.
Really the issue here is that we want to suggest the segment's span if the path resolves to something defined outside of the macro, and the macro's span if it resolves to something defined within.. I'll look into seeing if we can do something like that.
Fixes#92324
r? `@cjgillot`
Ignore other `PredicateKind`s in rustdoc auto trait finder
Fixes#92073
There's not really anything we can do with them, and they're
causing ICEs. I'm not using a wildcard match, as we should check
that any new `PredicateKind`s are handled properly by rustdoc.
rustc_metadata: Switch crate data iteration from a callback to iterator
The iteration looks more conventional this way, and some allocations are avoided.
Relax priv-in-pub lint on generic bounds and where clauses of trait impls.
The priv-in-pub lint is a legacy mechanism of the compiler, supplanted by a reachability-based [type privacy](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2145-type-privacy.md) analysis. This PR does **not** relax type privacy; it only relaxes the lint (as proposed by the type privacy RFC) in the case of trait impls.
## Current Behavior
On public trait impls, it's currently an **error** to have a `where` bound constraining a private type with a trait:
```rust
pub trait Trait {}
pub struct Type {}
struct Priv {}
impl Trait for Priv {}
impl Trait for Type
where
Priv: Trait // ERROR
{}
```
...and it's a **warning** to have have a public type constrained by a private trait:
```rust
pub trait Trait {}
pub struct Type {}
pub struct Pub {}
trait Priv {}
impl Priv for Pub {}
impl Trait for Type
where
Pub: Priv // WARNING
{}
```
This lint applies to `where` clauses in other contexts, too; e.g. on free functions:
```rust
struct Priv<T>(T);
pub trait Pub {}
impl<T: Pub> Pub for Priv<T> {}
pub fn function<T>()
where
Priv<T>: Pub // WARNING
{}
```
**These constraints could be relaxed without issue.**
## New Behavior
This lint is relaxed for `where` clauses on trait impls, such that it's okay to have a `where` bound constraining a private type with a trait:
```rust
pub trait Trait {}
pub struct Type {}
struct Priv {}
impl Trait for Priv {}
impl Trait for Type
where
Priv: Trait // OK
{}
```
...and it's okay to have a public type constrained by a private trait:
```rust
pub trait Trait {}
pub struct Type {}
pub struct Pub {}
trait Priv {}
impl Priv for Pub {}
impl Trait for Type
where
Pub: Priv // OK
{}
```
## Rationale
While the priv-in-pub lint is not essential for soundness, it *can* help programmers avoid pitfalls that would make their libraries difficult to use by others. For instance, such a lint *is* useful for free functions; e.g. if a downstream crate tries to call the `function` in the previous snippet in a generic context:
```rust
fn callsite<T>()
where
Priv<T>: Pub // ERROR: omitting this bound is a compile error, but including it is too
{
function::<T>()
}
```
...it cannot do so without repeating `function`'s `where` bound, which we cannot do because `Priv` is out-of-scope. A lint for this case is arguably helpful.
However, this same reasoning **doesn't** hold for trait impls. To call an unconstrained method on a public trait impl with private bounds, you don't need to forward those private bounds, you can forward the public trait:
```rust
mod upstream {
pub trait Trait {
fn method(&self) {}
}
pub struct Type<T>(T);
pub struct Pub<T>(T);
trait Priv {}
impl<T: Priv> Priv for Pub<T> {}
impl<T> Trait for Type<T>
where
Pub<T>: Priv // WARNING
{}
}
mod downstream {
use super::upstream::*;
fn function<T>(value: Type<T>)
where
Type<T>: Trait // <- no private deets!
{
value.method();
}
}
```
**This PR only eliminates the lint on trait impls.** It leaves it intact for all other contexts, including trait definitions, inherent impls, and function definitions. It doesn't need to exist in those cases either, but I figured I'd first target a case where it's mostly pointless.
## Other Notes
- See discussion [on zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/213817-t-lang/topic/relax.20priv-in-pub.20lint.20for.20trait.20impl.20.60where.60.20bounds/near/222458397).
- This PR effectively reverts #79291.
All other 'containers' (e.g. `impl` blocks) hashed their contents
in the normal, order-dependent way. However, `Mod` was hashing
its contents in a (sort-of) order-independent way. However, the
exact order is exposed to consumers through `Mod.item_ids`,
and through query results like `hir_module_items`. Therefore,
stable hashing needs to take the order of items into account,
to avoid fingerprint ICEs.
Unforuntately, I was unable to directly build a reproducer
for the ICE, due to the behavior of `Fingerprint::combine_commutative`.
This operation swaps the upper and lower `u64` when constructing the
result, which makes the function non-associative. Since we start
the hashing of module items by combining `Fingerprint::ZERO` with
the first item, it's difficult to actually build an example where
changing the order of module items leaves the final hash unchanged.
However, this appears to have been hit in practice in #92218
While we're not able to reproduce it, the fact that proc-macros
are involved (which can give an entire module the same span, preventing
any span-related invalidations) makes me confident that the root
cause of that issue is our method of hashing module items.
This PR removes all of the special handling for `Mod`, instead deriving
a `HashStable` implementation. This makes `Mod` consistent with other
'contains' like `Impl`, which hash their contents through the typical
derive of `HashStable`.
rustc_metadata: Merge `get_ctor_def_id` and `get_ctor_kind`
Also avoid decoding the whole `ty::AssocItem` to get a `has_self` flag.
A small optimization and cleanup extracted from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/89059.
CTFE eval_fn_call: use FnAbi to determine argument skipping and compatibility
This makes use of the `FnAbi` type in CTFE/Miri, which `@eddyb` has been saying for years is what we should do.^^ `FnAbi` is used to
- determine which arguments to skip (rather than the previous heuristic of skipping ZST arguments with the Rust ABI)
- impose further restrictions on whether caller and callee are consistent in how a given argument is passed
I was hoping it would also simplify the code, but that is not the case -- the previous type compatibility checks are still required (AFAIK), only the ZST skipping is gone and that took barely any code. We also need some hacks because `FnAbi` assumes a certain way of implementing `caller_location` (by passing extra arguments), but Miri can just read the caller location from the call stack so it doesn't need those arguments. (The fact that every backend has to separately implement support for these arguments seems suboptimal -- looks like this might have been better implemented on the MIR level.) To avoid having to implement those unnecessary arguments in Miri, we just compute *whether* the argument is present on the caller/callee side, but don't actually pass that argument around.
I have no idea if this looks the way `@eddyb` thinks it should look... but it makes Miri's test suite pass. ;)
One of rustc's tests fails unfortunately (`ui/const-generics/issues/issue-67739.rs`), some const generic code that is evaluated too early -- I think that should raise `TooGeneric` but instead it ICEs. My assumption is this is some FnAbi code that has not been properly tested on polymorphic code, but it might also be me calling that FnAbi code the wrong way.
r? `@oli-obk` `@eddyb`
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/56166
Miri PR at https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/pull/1928
Remove useless `#[global_allocator]` from rustc and rustdoc.
This was added in #83152, which has several errors in its comments.
This commit also fix up the comments, which are quite wrong and
misleading.
r? `@alexcrichton`
