6018: Correct project_root path for ProjectJson. r=jonas-schievink a=woody77
It was already the folder containing the rust-project.json file, not the file itself. This also removes the Option-ness of it, since it's now an infallible operation to set the member value.
Co-authored-by: Aaron Wood <aaronwood@google.com>
6036: Don't re-read open files from disk when reloading a workspace r=kjeremy a=lnicola
Fixes#5742Fixes#4263
or so I hope.
Co-authored-by: Laurențiu Nicola <lnicola@dend.ro>
6034: docs: suggest disabling the official extension r=jonas-schievink a=jonas-schievink
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonas.schievink@ferrous-systems.com>
6032: Support active parameters at the per-signature level r=jonas-schievink a=kjeremy
No functionality change. This also pulls in a few other protocol changes that we don't use and updates crates.
Co-authored-by: kjeremy <kjeremy@gmail.com>
6030: Small proc macro cleanup r=jonas-schievink a=jonas-schievink
git got really confused, but all I did in the first commit was unindent a few lines
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonas.schievink@ferrous-systems.com>
6024: Give `ExternCrate` a `Name`, not a `ModPath` r=jonas-schievink a=jonas-schievink
Simplifies things
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonas.schievink@ferrous-systems.com>
6017: Don't return any TextEdit if formatting is unchanged r=jonas-schievink a=cuviper
I found that `textDocument/formatting` was always returning a full
`TextEdit` replacement, even when there are no changes, which caused Vim
(w/ vim-lsp) to always indicate a modified buffer after formatting. We
can easily compare whether there were changes and return `null` if not,
so the client knows there's nothing to do.
Co-authored-by: Josh Stone <cuviper@gmail.com>
6016: Emit diagnostics for unresolved imports and extern crates r=jonas-schievink a=jonas-schievink
AFAIK, we don't have any major bugs in name resolution that would cause a lot of false positives here (except procedural attribute macro support and some rare issues around `#[path]` on module files), so these are *not* marked as experimental diagnostics right now.
I noticed that diagnostics in a file sometimes don't get displayed after opening, but require some edit to be performed. This seems like a preexisting issue though.
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonas.schievink@ferrous-systems.com>
5989: Rewrite import merging r=jonas-schievink a=Veykril
Rewrites how import merging is being handled. It is now a recursive function to properly handle merging of intermediate levels in the import trees. With this ordering the imports is also now possible tho it doesn't quite order it the same way as `rustfmt` does yet, namely it orders lowercase identifiers after uppercase identifiers as that is the standard character order that rust uses. This also fixes a few weird behaviors that were visible in some of the `replace_qualified_name_with_use.rs` tests.
This really took longer than I was hoping for, fighting with import trees is quite the exhausting task 😅
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <lukastw97@gmail.com>
6013: Add support for custom flycheck commands with JSON project workspaces r=jonas-schievink a=woody77
Enable flychecks with JSON project workspaces if an override command was provided as part
of the client configuration:
```
"rust-analyzer.checkOnSave.enable": true,
"rust-analyzer.checkOnSave.overrideCommand": ["custom_tool", "arg1", "arg2"],
```
Co-authored-by: Aaron Wood <aaronwood@google.com>
I found that `textDocument/formatting` was always returning a full
`TextEdit` replacement, even when there are no changes, which caused Vim
(w/ vim-lsp) to always indicate a modified buffer after formatting. We
can easily compare whether there were changes and return `null` if not,
so the client knows there's nothing to do.
6010: Avoid checking all ancestors and fix mis-completion r=jonas-schievink a=oxalica
Refactor the logic of `completion_match` to check deterministic number of ancestors instead of `token.ancestors().find_map()`.
This should fix wrong completions (https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/pull/5976#issuecomment-692332191) and hopefully make completion to be faster (#6004).
More play and test? @jonas-schievink @hammypants
If this patch works, we can avoid the revert #6005 . 😞
Co-authored-by: oxalica <oxalicc@pm.me>
