Uplift `clippy::{drop,forget}_{ref,copy}` lints
This PR aims at uplifting the `clippy::drop_ref`, `clippy::drop_copy`, `clippy::forget_ref` and `clippy::forget_copy` lints.
Those lints are/were declared in the correctness category of clippy because they lint on useless and most probably is not what the developer wanted.
## `drop_ref` and `forget_ref`
The `drop_ref` and `forget_ref` lint checks for calls to `std::mem::drop` or `std::mem::forget` with a reference instead of an owned value.
### Example
```rust
let mut lock_guard = mutex.lock();
std::mem::drop(&lock_guard) // Should have been drop(lock_guard), mutex
// still locked
operation_that_requires_mutex_to_be_unlocked();
```
### Explanation
Calling `drop` or `forget` on a reference will only drop the reference itself, which is a no-op. It will not call the `drop` or `forget` method on the underlying referenced value, which is likely what was intended.
## `drop_copy` and `forget_copy`
The `drop_copy` and `forget_copy` lint checks for calls to `std::mem::forget` or `std::mem::drop` with a value that derives the Copy trait.
### Example
```rust
let x: i32 = 42; // i32 implements Copy
std::mem::forget(x) // A copy of x is passed to the function, leaving the
// original unaffected
```
### Explanation
Calling `std::mem::forget` [does nothing for types that implement Copy](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/mem/fn.drop.html) since the value will be copied and moved into the function on invocation.
-----
Followed the instructions for uplift a clippy describe here: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/99696#pullrequestreview-1134072751
cc `@m-ou-se` (as T-libs-api leader because the uplifting was discussed in a recent meeting)
Simplify the implementation of iterators over slices of ZSTs
Currently, slice iterators over ZSTs store `end = start.wrapping_byte_add(len)`.
That's slightly convenient for `is_empty`, but kinda annoying for pretty much everything else -- see bugs like #42789, for example.
This PR instead changes it to just `end = ptr::invalid(len)` instead.
That's easier to think about (IMHO, at least) as well as easier to represent.
`next` is still to big to get inlined into the mir-opt/pre-codegen/ tests, but if I bump the inline threshold to force it to show the whole thing, this implementation is also less MIR:
```
> git diff --numstat
241 370 tests/mir-opt/pre-codegen/slice_iter.forward_loop.PreCodegen.after.mir
255 329 tests/mir-opt/pre-codegen/slice_iter.reverse_loop.PreCodegen.after.mir
184 216 tests/mir-opt/pre-codegen/slice_iter.slice_iter_mut_next_back.PreCodegen.after.mir
182 254 tests/mir-opt/pre-codegen/slice_iter.slice_iter_next.PreCodegen.after.mir
```
(That's ≈70 lines less for `Iter::next`, for example.)
r? `@ghost`
~~Built atop #111282, so draft until that lands.~~
Currently, slice iterators over ZSTs store `end = start.wrapping_byte_add(len)`.
That's slightly convenient for `is_empty`, but kinda annoying for pretty much everything else -- see bugs like 42789, for example.
This PR instead changes it to just `end = ptr::invalid(len)` instead.
That's easier to think about (IMHO, at least) as well as easier to represent.
Fix incorrect implication of transmuting slices
transmute<&[u8]> would be useful and as a beginner it is confusing to see documents casually confuse the types of &[u8] and [u8; SZ]
Remove some `assume`s from slice iterators that don't do anything
Because the start pointer is iterators is already a `NonNull`, we emit the appropriate `!nonnull` metadata when loading the pointer to tell LLVM that it's non-null.
Probably the best way to see that it's the metadata that's important (and not the `assume`) is to observe that LLVM actually *removes* the `assume` from the optimized IR: <https://rust.godbolt.org/z/KhE6G963n>.
(I also checked that, yes, the if-not-ZST `assume` on `end` is still doing something: it's how there's a `!nonnull` metadata on its load, even though it's an ordinary raw pointer. The codegen test added in this PR fails if the other `assume` is removed.)
Revert "Populate effective visibilities in `rustc_privacy`"
This reverts commit cff85f22f5, cc #110907. It needs to be fixed, but there are too many issues being reported that I wanted to put up a revert until a proper fix can be committed.
Fixes a ton of issues where private but still reachable impls were missing during codegen:
Fixes#111320Fixes#111321Fixes#111334Fixes#111357Fixes#111368Fixes#111373Fixes#111377Fixes#111386Fixes#111387
`@bors` p=1
r? `@petrochenkov`
Implement builtin # syntax and use it for offset_of!(...)
Add `builtin #` syntax to the parser, as well as a generic infrastructure to support both item and expression position builtin syntaxes. The PR also uses this infrastructure for the implementation of the `offset_of!` macro, added by #106934.
cc `@petrochenkov` `@DrMeepster`
cc #110680 `builtin #` tracking issue
cc #106655 `offset_of!` tracking issue
Add `#[inline]` to functions that are never called
This makes libcore binary size reduce by ~300 bytes. Not much, but these functions are never called so it doesn't make sense for them to get into the binary anyway.
Always const-evaluate the GCD in `slice::align_to_offsets`
Use an inline `const`-block to force the compiler to calculate the GCD at compile time, even in debug mode. This shouldn't affect the behavior of the program at all, but it drastically cuts down on the number of instructions emitted with optimizations disabled.
With the current implementation, a single `slice::align_to` instantiation (specifically `<[u8]>::align_to::<u128>()`) generates 676 instructions (on x86-64). Forcing the GCD computation to be const cuts it down to 327 instructions, so just over 50% less. This is obviously not representative of actual runtime gains, but I still see it as a significant win as long as it doesn't degrade compile times.
Not having to worry about LLVM const-evaluating the GCD function also allows it to use the textbook recursive euclidean algorithm instead of a much more complicated iterative implementation with multiple `unsafe`-blocks.
Remove `identity_future` from stdlib
This function/lang_item was introduced in #104321 as a temporary workaround of future lowering. The usage and need for it went away in #104833.
After a bootstrap update, the function itself can be removed from `std`.
enable `rust_2018_idioms` lint group for doctests
With this change, `rust_2018_idioms` lint group will be enabled for compiler/libstd doctests.
Resolves#106086Resolves#99144
Signed-off-by: ozkanonur <work@onurozkan.dev>
Constify `[u8]::is_ascii` (unstably)
UTF-8 checking in `const fn`-stabilized back in 1.63 (#97367), but apparently somehow ASCII checking was never const-ified, despite being simpler.
New constness-tracking issue for `is_ascii`: #111090
I noticed this working on `ascii::Char`: #110998
This function/lang_item was introduced in #104321 as a temporary workaround of future lowering.
The usage and need for it went away in #104833.
After a bootstrap update, the function itself can be removed from `std`.
Remove calls to `mem::forget` and `mem::replace` in `Option::get_or_insert_with`.
This removes the unneeded calls to `mem::forget` and `mem::replace` in `Option::get_or_insert_with`.
clean up `transmute`s in `core`
* Use `transmute_unchecked` instead of `transmute_copy` for `MaybeUninit::transpose`.
* Use manual transmute for `Option<Ordering>` → `i8`.
Add cross-language LLVM CFI support to the Rust compiler
This PR adds cross-language LLVM Control Flow Integrity (CFI) support to the Rust compiler by adding the `-Zsanitizer-cfi-normalize-integers` option to be used with Clang `-fsanitize-cfi-icall-normalize-integers` for normalizing integer types (see https://reviews.llvm.org/D139395).
It provides forward-edge control flow protection for C or C++ and Rust -compiled code "mixed binaries" (i.e., for when C or C++ and Rust -compiled code share the same virtual address space). For more information about LLVM CFI and cross-language LLVM CFI support for the Rust compiler, see design document in the tracking issue #89653.
Cross-language LLVM CFI can be enabled with -Zsanitizer=cfi and -Zsanitizer-cfi-normalize-integers, and requires proper (i.e., non-rustc) LTO (i.e., -Clinker-plugin-lto).
Thank you again, ``@bjorn3,`` ``@nikic,`` ``@samitolvanen,`` and the Rust community for all the help!
Implement tuple<->array convertions via `From`
This PR adds the following impls that convert between homogeneous tuples and arrays of the corresponding lengths:
```rust
impl<T> From<[T; 1]> for (T,) { ... }
impl<T> From<[T; 2]> for (T, T) { ... }
/* ... */
impl<T> From<[T; 12]> for (T, T, T, T, T, T, T, T, T, T, T, T) { ... }
impl<T> From<(T,)> for [T; 1] { ... }
impl<T> From<(T, T)> for [T; 2] { ... }
/* ... */
impl<T> From<(T, T, T, T, T, T, T, T, T, T, T, T)> for [T; 12] { ... }
```
IMO these are quite uncontroversial but note that they are, just like any other trait impls, insta-stable.
This commit adds cross-language LLVM Control Flow Integrity (CFI)
support to the Rust compiler by adding the
`-Zsanitizer-cfi-normalize-integers` option to be used with Clang
`-fsanitize-cfi-icall-normalize-integers` for normalizing integer types
(see https://reviews.llvm.org/D139395).
It provides forward-edge control flow protection for C or C++ and Rust
-compiled code "mixed binaries" (i.e., for when C or C++ and Rust
-compiled code share the same virtual address space). For more
information about LLVM CFI and cross-language LLVM CFI support for the
Rust compiler, see design document in the tracking issue #89653.
Cross-language LLVM CFI can be enabled with -Zsanitizer=cfi and
-Zsanitizer-cfi-normalize-integers, and requires proper (i.e.,
non-rustc) LTO (i.e., -Clinker-plugin-lto).
