Add `-Z dump-mir-dataflow` flag for dumping dataflow results visualization
Previously, to visualize the results of a MIR dataflow pass, one had to add a `#[rustc_mir(borrowck_graphviz_postflow)]` attribute to functions of interest. However, there is no way to specify this attribute on closures and generators, so it was impossible to view results for these MIR bodies.
This PR adds a flag, `-Z dump-mir-dataflow`, which will output the dataflow results for any functions specified in `-Z dump-mir` to the output directory specified by `-Z dump-mir-dir`. This behavior is modeled on the `-Z dump-mir-graphviz` flag.
use is_empty() instead of len comparison (clippy::len_zero)
use if let instead of while let loop that never loops (clippy::never_loop)
remove redundant returns (clippy::needless_return)
remove redundant closures (clippy::redundant_closure)
use if let instead of match and wildcard pattern (clippy::single_match)
don't repeat field names redundantly (clippy::redundant_field_names)
Move arg/constraint partition check to validation & improve recovery
- In the first commit, we move the check rejecting e.g., `<'a, Item = u8, String>` from the parser into AST validation.
- We then use this to improve the code for parsing generic arguments.
- And we add recovery for e.g., `<Item = >` (missing), `<Item = 42>` (constant), and `<Item = 'a>` (lifetime).
This is also preparatory work for supporting https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/70256.
r? @varkor
Specifically, remove both `-Z no_integrated_as` and
`TargetOptions::no_integrated_as`. The latter was only used for the
`msp430_none_elf` platform, for which it's no longer required.
`-C incremental` was introduced over two years ago. `-Z incremental` was
kept for transitioning, but it's been long enough now that it should be
ok to remove it.
Remove some imports to the rustc crate
- When we have `NestedVisitorMap::None`, we use `type Map = dyn intravisit::Map<'v>;` instead of the actual map. This doesn't actually result in dynamic dispatch (in the future we may want to use an associated type default to simplify the code).
- Use `rustc_session::` imports instead of `rustc::{session, lint}`.
r? @Zoxc
ast: `Mac`/`Macro` -> `MacCall`
It's now obvious that these refer to macro calls rather than to macro definitions.
It's also a single name instead of two different names in different places.
`rustc_expand` usually calls macro calls in a wide sense (including attributes and derives) "macro invocations", but structures and variants renamed in this PR are only relevant to fn-like macros, so it's simpler and clearer to just call them calls.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/63586#discussion_r314232513
r? @eddyb
parse: fuse associated and extern items up to defaultness
Language changes:
- The grammar of extern `type` aliases is unified with associated ones, and becomes:
```rust
TypeItem = "type" ident generics {":" bounds}? where_clause {"=" type}? ";" ;
```
Semantic restrictions (`ast_validation`) are added to forbid any parameters in `generics`, any bounds in `bounds`, and any predicates in `where_clause`, as well as the presence of a type expression (`= u8`).
(Work still remains to fuse this with free `type` aliases, but this can be done later.)
- The grammar of constants and static items (free, associated, and extern) now permits the absence of an expression, and becomes:
```rust
GlobalItem = {"const" {ident | "_"} | "static" "mut"? ident} {"=" expr}? ";" ;
```
- A semantic restriction is added to enforce the presence of the expression (the body).
- A semantic restriction is added to reject `const _` in associated contexts.
Together, these changes allow us to fuse the grammar of associated items and extern items up to `default`ness which is the main goal of the PR.
-----------------------
We are now very close to fully fusing the entirely of item parsing and their ASTs. To progress further, we must make a decision: should we parse e.g. `default use foo::bar;` and whatnot? Accepting that is likely easiest from a parsing perspective, as it does not require using look-ahead, but it is perhaps not too onerous to only accept it for `fn`s (and all their various qualifiers), `const`s, `static`s, and `type`s.
r? @petrochenkov
