Implement RFC 2056 trivial constraints in where clauses
This is an implementation of the new behaviour for #48214. Tests are mostly updated to show the effects of this. Feature gate hasn't been added yet.
Some things that are worth noting and are maybe not want we want
* `&mut T: Copy` doesn't allow as much as someone might expect because there is often an implicit reborrow.
* ~There isn't a check that a where clause is well-formed any more, so `where Vec<str>: Debug` is now allowed (without a `str: Sized` bound).~
r? @nikomatsakis
Remove ScopeTarget and LoopIdResult
* Remove ScopeTarget in preparation of label-break-value (PR #50045)
* Replace LoopIdResult by Result which is possible now thanks to commit 8ac65af81f " Implement Encodable and Decodable for Result."
r? @eddyb
rustdoc: replace most (e)println! statements with structured warnings/errors
Turns out, the rustc diagnostic handler doesn't need a whole lot of setup that we weren't already doing. For errors that occur outside a "dealing with source code" context, we can just use the format/color config we were already parsing and make up a `Handler` that we can emit structured warnings/errors from. So i did that. This will make it way easier to test things with `rustdoc-ui` tests, since those require the JSON error output. (In fact, this PR is a yak shave for a different one where i was trying to do just that. `>_>`)
The grammar defines identifiers in terms of XID_start and XID_continue,
but this is referring to the unstable non_ascii_idents feature.
The documentation implies that non_ascii_idents is forthcoming, but this
is left over from pre-1.0 documentation; in reality, non_ascii_idents
has been without even an RFC for several years now, and will not be
stabilized anytime soon. Furthermore, according to the tracking issue at
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/28979 , it's highly
questionable whether or not this feature will use XID_start or
XID_continue even when or if non_ascii_idents is stabilized.
This commit fixes this by respecifying identifiers as the usual
[a-zA-Z_][a-zA-Z0-9_]*
Issue #50786 shows a case with local rebuild where the libraries built
by stage0 had the same suffix as stage0's own, and were accidentally
loaded by that stage0 rustc when compiling `librustc_trans`.
Now we set `__CARGO_DEFAULT_LIB_METADATA` to "bootstrap" during stage0,
rather than the release channel like usual, so the library suffix will
always be completely distinct from the stage0 compiler.
The Great Generics Generalisation: Ty Edition
Part of the generic parameter refactoring effort, split off from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/48149. Contains the `ty`-relative refactoring.
r? @eddyb
Don't inject clippy into the rls anymore
r? @kennytm
sorry about breaking nightlies.
The issue is that the `[patch.crates-io]` doesn't work if the versions differ. So every time we update clippy, we can only update it to the verison that rls is depending on.
I'm disabling the injection of clippy into rls for now. I'm not sure how to do this properly. We could
* add a version check, so rls only builds clippy if its dependency clippy is the same as the submodule clippy
* do something crazy like auto-patching the Cargo.toml of the rls tool repo to just use a path dependency on clippy
* build crates-io clippy instead of submodule clippy and gate clippy injection on that
* that's somewhat automatic, and is essentially what is necessary right now, but done manually
* make clippy 0.1.* instead of 0.0.* and update patch versions for nightly updates and minor version updates for `clippy_lints` api changes.
* not sure how semver-great this is
The crash that happened in #23566 doesn't happen anymore with the LLVM mergefunc
pass enabled and it hugely reduces code size (for example it shaves off 10% of the
final Servo executable). This patch reenables it.
When we want to implement label-break-value,
we can't really decide whether to emit ScopeTarget::Loop or
ScopeTarget::Block in the code that is supposed to create it.
So we get rid of it and reconstruct the information when
needed.
This leads to a lot of simplifications, as most code doesn't actually need to know about the specific lifetime/type data; rather, it's concerned with properties like name, index and def_id.
