Merge `impl_wf_inference` (`check_mod_impl_wf`) check into coherence checking
Problem here is that we call `collect_impl_trait_in_trait_types` when checking `check_mod_impl_wf` which is performed before coherence. Due to the `tcx.sess.track_errors`, since we end up reporting an error, we never actually proceed to coherence checking, where we would be emitting a more useful impl overlap error.
This change means that we may report more errors in some cases, but can at least proceed far enough to leave a useful message for overlapping traits with RPITITs in them.
Fixes#116982
r? types
Remove fold code and add `Const::internal()` to StableMIR
We are not planning to support user generated constant in the foreseeable future, so we are cleaning up the fold logic and user created type for now. Users should use `Instance::resolve` in order to trigger monomorphization.
The Instance::resolve was however incomplete, since we weren't handling internalizing constants yet. Thus, I added that.
I decided to keep the `Const` fields private in case we decide to translate them lazily.
Modernize rustc_builtin_macros generics helpers
- Rustfmt-compatible formatting for the code snippets in comments
- Eliminate an _"Extra scope required"_ obsoleted by NLL
Uplift `ClauseKind` and `PredicateKind` into `rustc_type_ir`
Uplift `ClauseKind` and `PredicateKind` into `rustc_type_ir`.
Blocked on #116951
r? `@ghost`
Get rid of `'tcx` lifetime on `ConstVid`, `EffectVid`
These are simply newtyped numbers, so don't really have a reason (per se) to have a lifetime -- `TyVid` and `RegionVid` do not, for example.
The only consequence of this is that we need to use a new key type for `UnifyKey` that mentions `'tcx`. This is already done for `RegionVid`, with `RegionVidKey<'tcx>`, but this `UnifyKey` trait implementation may have been the original reason to give `ConstVid` a lifetime. See the changes to `compiler/rustc_middle/src/infer/unify_key.rs` specifically.
I consider the code cleaner this way, though -- we removed quite a few unnecessary `'tcx` in the process. This also makes it easier to uplift these two ids to `rustc_type_ir`, which I plan on doing in a follow-up PR.
r? `@BoxyUwU`
We are not planning to support user generated constant in the
foreseeable future, so we are removing the Fold logic for now in
favor of the Instance::resolve logic.
The Instance::resolve was however incomplete, since we weren't handling
internalizing constants yet. Thus, I added that.
I decided to keep the Const fields private in case we decide to
translate them lazily.
In general it is not correct to inline a callee with a target features
that are subset of the callee. Require target features to match exactly
during inlining.
The exact match could be potentially relaxed, but this would require
identifying specific feature that are allowed to differ, those that need
to match, and those that can be present in caller but not in callee.
This resolves MIR part of #116573. For other concerns with respect to
the previous implementation also see areInlineCompatible in LLVM.
Chrome links .rlibs with /WHOLEARCHIVE or -Wl,--whole-archive to prevent
the linker from discarding static initializers. This works well, except
on Windows x86, where lld complains:
error: /safeseh: lib.rmeta is not compatible with SEH
The fix is simply to mark the .rmeta as SAFESEH aware. This is trivially
true, since the metadata file does not contain any executable code.
Add method to convert internal to stable constructs
This is an alternative implementation to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/116999. I believe we can still improve the logic a bit here, but I wanted to see which direction we should go first.
In this implementation, the API is simpler and we keep Tables somewhat private. The definition is still public though, since we have to expose the Stable trait. However, there's a cost of keeping another thread-local and using `Rc`, but I'm hoping it will be a small cost.
r? ``@oli-obk``
r? ``@spastorino``
Suggest unwrap/expect for let binding type mismatch
Found it when investigating https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116738
I'm not sure whether it's a good style to suggest `unwrap`, seems it's may helpful for newcomers.
#116738 needs another fix to improve it.
