Enhance report-time option
## Short overview
This PR is a follow-up to a previously closed#64714 PR.
## Changes introduced by this PR
* `libtest` now retrieves the type of the test within `TestDesc` (available types are: `UnitTest`, `IntegrationTest`, `DocTest`, `Unknown`).
* `--report-time` subcommand of the `libtest` now supports colored output (disabled by default).
* Colorized output depends on the threshold values. Default values (proposed by @wesleywiser):
- For unit-tests: 50ms warn/100ms critical,
- For integration-tests: 500ms warn/1000ms critical,
- For doctests: same as for integration tests,
- For unknown tests: `TEST_WARN_TIMEOUT_S` warn/ `TEST_WARN_TIMEOUT_S * 2` critical (it will only applied single-threaded mode, because otherwise test will be interrupted after reaching `TEST_WARN_TIMEOUT_S`).
- These values can be overrided by setting environment variables (since those thresholds are somewhat constant for every project, it's more flexible to use environment variables than command line arguments).
* New optional flag `--ensure-test-time` for `libtest`. With this flag applied, exectuion time limit excesss will cause test failure.
## What have not been done
There was a comment that it would be nice to have an entry in the Cargo book about it.
However, changes introduced by this PR (and #64663 in which `report-time` flag was added) aren't related directly to `cargo`, it's more about `libtest` itself.
I'm considering that [The Unstable Book](https://doc.rust-lang.org/unstable-book/) is more appropriate place, but not sure if I'm right (and if so, how exactly it should be described).
As one possible option, this PR may be merged without denoting it in the documentation, and in the next PR adding support of this feature to the `cargo` itself, I'll add a note in the Cargo book.
## Scope of this PR
Logical scope of this PR is `libtest` only. However, to get test types, I had to modify also `libsyntax_ext` and `librustdoc` for them to provide information about test type.
## Rationale
Rationale for colored output was submitted in #64714
Providing the information about kind of test was also proposed in #64714, and as an additional benefit this information may be useful for the tools using `libtest` (e.g. `cargo`).
Adding flag to treat time limits excess seems logical to me, so projects that do care about test execution time won't have to invent a wheel.
## Backward compatibility
All the changes are completely backward compatible.
## Demo
r? @wesleywiser
Rollup of 15 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #64337 (libstd: Fix typos in doc)
- #64986 (Function pointers as const generic arguments)
- #65048 (Added doc about behavior of extend on HashMap)
- #65191 (Add some regression tests)
- #65200 (Add ?Sized bound to a supertrait listing in E0038 error documentation)
- #65205 (Add long error explanation for E0568)
- #65220 (Update LLVM for Emscripten exception handling support)
- #65263 (Deduplicate is_{freeze,copy,sized}_raw)
- #65266 (Mark Path::join as must_use)
- #65276 (Don't cc rust-lang/compiler for toolstate changes)
- #65277 (Query generator kind for error reporting)
- #65283 (stability: Do not use `buffer_lint` after lowering to HIR)
- #65289 (Fix suggested bound addition diagnostic)
- #65310 (deriving: avoid dummy Span on an artificial `type_ident` path)
- #65321 (Remove painful test that is not pulling its weight)
Failed merges:
r? @ghost
Always mark rust and rust-call abi's as unwind
PR #63909 identified a bug that had been injected by PR #55982. As discussed on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/64655#issuecomment-537517428 , we started marking extern items as nounwind, *even* extern items that said they were using "Rust" or "rust-call" ABI.
This is a more targeted variant of PR #63909 that fixes the above bug.
Fix#64655
----
I personally suspect we will want PR #63909 to land in the long-term
But:
* it is not certain that PR #63909 *will* land,
* more importantly, PR #63909 almost certainly will not be backported to beta/stable.
The identified bug was more severe than I think anyone realized (apart from perhaps @gnzlbg, as noted [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/63909#issuecomment-524818838)).
Thus, I was motivated to write this PR, which fixes *just* the issue with extern rust/rust-call functions, and deliberately avoids injecting further deviation from current behavior (you can see further notes on this in the comments of the code added here).
Remove painful test that is not pulling its weight
Research suggests that we are not properly testing this case anyway, and
even if we were, it is unlikely that we will regress here -- or, perhaps
more accurately, if we do, I am uncertain that we care too much. It
definitely seems like an edge case, and one that is particularly
unlikely to occur as time goes on.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/63520
deriving: avoid dummy Span on an artificial `type_ident` path
The dummy Span pointed to the beginning of the source file instead to where the `#[derive]` is located. Later, it tripped the `in_derive_expansion(span)` check at `src/librustc/middle/stability.rs`, causing a span-less deprecation warning to be emitted.
Fixes#56195, Fixes#55417.
Mark Path::join as must_use
I've accidentally did `mut_path_buf.jon(a_path);`, expecting this to be an in-place modification. Seems like we can easily warn in such cases?
Deduplicate is_{freeze,copy,sized}_raw
Fixes#65259
Deduplicates `is_{freeze,copy,sized}_raw` by delegating to a new method which takes in a `LangItem`.
Update LLVM for Emscripten exception handling support
Updates LLVM to pick up the cherry-picked support for correctly
handling exception handling with aggregates passed by value. This will
be necessary to continue to support Emscripten's exception handling
once we switch using Emscripten's LLVM backend. See #63649.
Add ?Sized bound to a supertrait listing in E0038 error documentation
This example failed to compile because of implicit `Sized` bound for `A` parameter that wasn't required by `Trait`.
Add some regression tests
- Add a test for #62187.
- Clean up the directory structure in `src/test/ui/const-generics`
- Closes#64792.
- Closes#57399.
- Closes#57271.
Added doc about behavior of extend on HashMap
It was unclear what the implementation does when it encounters existing keys. This change makes it clear by documenting the trait impl.
Research suggests that we are not properly testing this case anyway, and
even if we were, it is unlikely that we will regress here -- or, perhaps
more accurately, if we do, I am uncertain that we care too much. It
definitely seems like an edge case, and one that is particularly
unlikely to occur as time goes on.
