If an item is skipped due to it being unreachable or for some optimization, then
it shouldn't be encoded into the metadata (because it wasn't present in the
first place).
I have tried this fix and it seems to work either with single or multiple trait inheritance.
trait Base:Base2 + Base3{
fn foo(&self);
}
trait Base2 {
fn baz(&self);
}
trait Base3{
fn root(&self);
}
trait Super: Base{
fn bar(&self);
}
struct X;
impl Base for X {
fn foo(&self) {
println("base foo");
}
}
impl Base2 for X {
fn baz(&self) {
println("base2 baz");
}
}
impl Base3 for X {
fn root(&self) {
println("base3 root");
}
}
impl Super for X {
fn bar(&self) {
println("super bar");
}
}
fn main() {
let n = X;
let s = &n as &Super;
s.bar();
s.foo(); // super bar
s.baz();
s.root();
}
bmaxa@maxa:~/examples/rust$ rustc error.rs
bmaxa@maxa:~/examples/rust$ ./error
super bar
base foo
base2 baz
base3 root
This solves problem of incorrect indexing into vtable
when method from super trait was called through pointer
to derived trait.
Problem was that offset of super trait vtables
was not calculated at all.
Now it works, correct offset is calculated by
traversing all super traits up to super trait
where method belongs. That is how it is
intended to work.
If there's no TLS key just yet, then there's nothing to unsafely borrow, so
continue returning None. This prevents causing the runtime to abort itself when
logging before the runtime is fully initialized.
Closes#9487
r? @brson
If there's no TLS key just yet, then there's nothing to unsafely borrow, so
continue returning None. This prevents causing the runtime to abort itself when
logging before the runtime is fully initialized.
Closes#9487
This fixes private statics and functions from being usable cross-crates, along
with some bad privacy error messages. This is a reopening of #8365 with all the
privacy checks in privacy.rs instead of resolve.rs (where they should be
anyway).
These maps of exported items will hopefully get used for generating
documentation by rustdoc
Closes#8592
Progress on #7981
This doesn't completely close the issue because `struct A;` is still allowed, and it's a much larger change to disallow that. I'm also not entirely sure that we want to disallow that. Regardless, punting that discussion to the issue instead.
Resolves third bullet of #4691: if the functional-struct-update (FSU) expression `{ a: b, ..s }` causes `s` to move and `s` has a destructor, then the expression is illegal.
r? @nikomatsakis
Many people will be very confused that their debug! statements aren't working
when they first use rust only to learn that they should have been building with
`--cfg debug` the entire time. This inverts the meaning of the flag to instead
of enabling debug statements, now it disables debug statements.
This way the default behavior is a bit more reasonable, and requires less
end-user configuration. Furthermore, this turns on debug by default when
building the rustc compiler.
This is for consistency in naming conventions.
- ``std::num::Float::NaN()`` is changed to ``nan()``;
- ``std::num::Float.is_NaN()`` is changed to ``is_nan()``; and
- ``std::num::strconv::NumStrConv::NaN()`` is changed to ``nan()``.
Fixes#9319.
This is the second of two parts of #8991, now possible as a new snapshot
has been made. (The first part implemented the unreachable!() macro; it
was #8992, 6b7b8f2682.)
``std::util::unreachable()`` is removed summarily; any code which used
it should now use the ``unreachable!()`` macro.
Closes#9312.
Closes#8991.
This is for consistency in naming conventions.
- ``std::num::Float::NaN()`` is changed to ``nan()``;
- ``std::num::Float.is_NaN()`` is changed to ``is_nan()``; and
- ``std::num::strconv::NumStrConv::NaN()`` is changed to ``nan()``.
Fixes#9319.
This is my first contribution, so please point out anything that I may have missed.
I consulted IRC and settled on `match () { ... }` for most of the replacements.
This is the second of two parts of #8991, now possible as a new snapshot
has been made. (The first part implemented the unreachable!() macro; it
was #8992, 6b7b8f2682.)
``std::util::unreachable()`` is removed summarily; any code which used
it should now use the ``unreachable!()`` macro.
Closes#9312.
Closes#8991.
Since 3b6314c the pretty printer seems to only print trait bounds for `ast::ty_path(...)`s that have a generics arguments list. That seems wrong, so let's always print them.
Closes#9253, un-xfails test for #7673.
This commit adds support for `\0` escapes in character and string literals.
Since `\0` is equivalent to `\x00`, this is a direct translation to the latter
escape sequence. Future builds will be able to compile using `\0` directly.
Also updated the grammar specification and added a test for NUL characters.
Since 3b6314c3 the pretty printer seems to only print trait bounds for
`ast::ty_path(...)`s that have a generics arguments list. That seems
wrong, so let's always print them.
Closes#9253, un-xfails test for #7673.
If a static is flagged as address_insignificant, then for LLVM to actually
perform the relevant optimization it must have an internal linkage type. What
this means, though, is that the static will not be available to other crates.
Hence, if you have a generic function with an inner static, it will fail to link
when built as a library because other crates will attempt to use the inner
static externally.
This gets around the issue by inlining the static into the metadata. The same
relevant optimization is then applied separately in the external crate. What
this ends up meaning is that all statics tagged with #[address_insignificant]
will appear at most once per crate (by value), but they could appear in multiple
crates.
This should be the last blocker for using format! ...
This doesn't close any bugs as the goal is to convert the parameter to by-value, but this is a step towards being able to make guarantees about `&T` pointers (where T is Freeze) to LLVM.
In #8185 cross-crate condition handlers were fixed by ensuring that globals
didn't start appearing in different crates with different addressed. An
unfortunate side effect of that pull request is that constants weren't inlined
across crates (uint::bits is unknown to everything but libstd).
This commit fixes this inlining by using the `available_eternally` linkage
provided by LLVM. It partially reverts #8185, and then adds support for this
linkage type. The main caveat is that not all statics could be inlined into
other crates. Before this patch, all statics were considered "inlineable items",
but an unfortunate side effect of how we deal with `&static` and `&[static]`
means that these two cases cannot be inlined across crates. The translation of
constants was modified to propogate this condition of whether a constant
should be considered inlineable into other crates.
Closes#9036
