This is done because `to_owned` is very similarly named to `into_owned`, but the
effect of calling those two methods is completely different. This creates
confusion (stemming from the ambiguity of the 'owned' term in the context of
`Cow`s) and might not be what the writer intended.
new lint
This fixes#6576
If you added a new lint, here's a checklist for things that will be
checked during review or continuous integration.
- \[x] Followed [lint naming conventions][lint_naming]
- \[x] Added passing UI tests (including committed `.stderr` file)
- \[x] `cargo test` passes locally
- \[x] Executed `cargo dev update_lints`
- \[x] Added lint documentation
- \[x] Run `cargo dev fmt`
---
changelog: add [`multi_assignments`] lint
Lint `collapsible_str_replace`
fixes#6651
```
changelog: [`collapsible_str_replace`]: create new lint `collapsible_str_replace`
```
If you added a new lint, here's a checklist for things that will be
checked during review or continuous integration.
- \[x] Followed [lint naming conventions][lint_naming]
- \[x] Added passing UI tests (including committed `.stderr` file)
- \[x] `cargo test` passes locally
- \[ ] Executed `cargo dev update_lints`
- \[x] Added lint documentation
- \[x] Run `cargo dev fmt`
Add new lint [`positional_named_format_parameters`]
*Please write a short comment explaining your change (or "none" for internal only changes)*
changelog: Add new lint [`positional_named_format_parameters`] to warn when named parameters in format strings are used as positional arguments.
Add lint recommending using `std::iter::once` and `std::iter::empty`
```
changelog: [`iter_once`]: add new lint
changelog: [`iter_empty`]: add new lint
```
fixes#9186
- \[ ] Followed [lint naming conventions][lint_naming]
- \[x] Added passing UI tests (including committed `.stderr` file)
- \[x] `cargo test` passes locally
- \[x] Executed `cargo dev update_lints`
- \[x] Added lint documentation
- \[x] Run `cargo dev fmt`
[lint_naming]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/0344-conventions-galore.html#lints
The lint doesn't really follow the naming conventions. I don't have any better idea so I'm open to suggestions.
Add partialeq_to_none lint
Initial implementation of #9275, adding lint `partialeq_to_none`. This is my first time working on `clippy`, so please review carefully.
I'm unsure especially about the `Sugg`, as it covers the entire `BinOp`, instead of just covering one of the sides and the operator (see the multi-line example). I was unsure if pinpointing the suggestion wouldn't be brittle...
changelog: [`PARTIALEQ_TO_NONE`]: Initial commit
Add new lint `obfuscated_if_else`
part of #9100, additional commits could make it work with `then` and `unwrap_or_else` as well
changelog: Add new lint `obfuscated_if_else`
Changelog for Rust 1.62 🦖
This special artifact was just discovered. The artifact details changes to something called Clippy. Presently and from the context, we were unable to determine what this is supposed to be. All we know, is that it seems to have an active community around it which supports it. The members sometimes use paper clips as a secret symbol for Clippy.
I want to donate this artifact to the rust-lang organization, to have it displayed to the public.
---
changelog: none
add [`manual_find`] lint for function return case
part of the implementation discussed in #7143
changelog: add [`manual_find`] lint for function return case
Update description in clippy_lints/src/default_iter_empty.rs
Co-authored-by: Fridtjof Stoldt <xFrednet@gmail.com>
Update clippy_lints/src/default_iter_empty.rs
Co-authored-by: Alex Macleod <alex@macleod.io>
Update clippy_lints/src/default_iter_empty.rs
Co-authored-by: Alex Macleod <alex@macleod.io>
renamed default_iter_empty to default_instead_of_iter_empty
Avoid duplicate messages
add tests for regression
rewrite 'Why is this bad?'
cargo dev fmt
delete default_iter_empty lint in renamed_lint.rs
rewrite a message in the suggestion
cargo dev update_lints --check
new lint: `borrow_deref_ref`
changelog: ``[`borrow_deref_ref`]``
Related pr: #6837#7577
`@Jarcho` Could you please give a review?
`cargo lintcheck` gives no false negative (but tested crates are out-of-date).
TODO:
1. Not sure the name. `deref_on_immutable_ref` or some others?
Mini changelog update for Rust 1.61.0
I'll do the full release and sync tomorrow, as I sadly don't have the time today. This is a quick update to ensure that Rust's changelog will link to the correct section in our changelog. The change is according to [our docs](8751e47bae/book/src/development/infrastructure/release.md (update-changelogmd))
changelog: none
New lint: [`derive_partial_eq_without_eq`]
Introduces a new lint, [`derive_partial_eq_without_eq`].
See: #1781 (doesn't close it though).
changelog: add lint [`derive_partial_eq_without_eq`]
Take over: New lint bytes count to len
take over #8375close#8083
This PR adds new lint about considering replacing `.bytes().count()` with `.len()`.
Thank you in advance.
---
r! `@Manishearth`
changelog: adds new lint [`bytes_count_to_len`] to consider replacing `.bytes().count()` with `.len()`
Add `await_holding_invalid_type` lint
changelog: [`await_holding_invalid_type`]
This lint allows users to create a denylist of types which are not allowed to be
held across await points. This is essentially a re-implementation of the
language-level [`must_not_suspend`
lint](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/83310). That lint has a lot of
work still to be done before it will reach Rust stable, and in the meantime
there are a lot of types which can trip up developers if they are used
improperly.
I originally implemented this specifically for `tracing::span::Entered`, until I discovered #8434 and read the commentary on that PR. Given this implementation is fully user configurable, doesn't tie clippy to any one particular crate, and introduces no additional dependencies, it seems more appropriate.
changelog: [`await_holding_invalid_type`]
This lint allows users to create a denylist of types which are not allowed to be
held across await points. This is essentially a re-implementation of the
language-level [`must_not_suspend`
lint](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/83310). That lint has a lot of
work still to be done before it will reach Rust stable, and in the meantime
there are a lot of types which can trip up developers if they are used
improperly.
This lint checks if Option::take() is used on a temporary value (a value
that is not of type &mut Option and that is not a Place expression) to
suggest omitting take()
New lint `is_digit_ascii_radix`
Closes#6399
changelog: Added [`is_digit_ascii_radix`]: recommend `is_ascii_digit()` or `is_ascii_hexdigit()` in place of `is_digit(10)` and `is_digit(16)`
Add `crate_in_macro_def` lint
This PR adds a lint to check for `crate` as opposed to `$crate` used in a macro definition.
I think this can close#4798. That issue focused on the case where the macro author "imports something into said macro."
But I think use of `crate` is likely to be a bug whether it appears in a `use` statement or not. There could be some use case I am failing to see, though. (cc: `@nilscript` `@flip1995)`
changelog: `crate_in_macro_def`
