mikros/rust
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
206,372 Commits 2 Branches 0 Tags
Commit Graph

905 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
bors
09ae7846a2 Auto merge of #101619 - Xiretza:rustc_parse-session-diagnostics, r=davidtwco 
Migrate more of rustc_parse to SessionDiagnostic

Still far from complete, but I thought I'd add a checkpoint here because rebasing was starting to get annoying.
 2022-09-28 11:11:42 +00:00
bors
6201eabde8 Auto merge of #102302 - nnethercote:more-lexer-improvements, r=matklad 
More lexer improvements

A follow-up to #99884.

r? `@matklad`
 2022-09-28 08:14:04 +00:00
Nicholas Nethercote
d0a26acb2a Address review comments. 2022-09-28 11:15:23 +10:00
Matthias Krüger
8b635cba1d
Rollup merge of #102284 - compiler-errors:missing-type-in-raw-ptr, r=davidtwco 
Structured suggestion for missing `mut`/`const` in raw pointer

Fixes #102261
 2022-09-27 21:42:23 +02:00
Xiretza
d7c64574e0 Implement IntoDiagnosticArg for rustc_ast::token::Token(Kind) 2022-09-27 20:29:19 +02:00
Xiretza
37fdcb4b36 Don't unnecessarily stringify paths in diagnostics 2022-09-27 20:29:19 +02:00
Xiretza
caefac034e Document use of Symbol::to_string() 2022-09-27 20:29:19 +02:00
Xiretza
00f95468c4 Migrate even more diagnostics in rustc_parse to diagnostic structs 2022-09-27 20:29:19 +02:00
Xiretza
760c4352d6 Migrate "struct literal body without path" error to diagnostic struct 2022-09-27 20:29:19 +02:00
Xiretza
ba10f2c0f2 Migrate "expected semicolon" diagnostics to diagnostic structs 2022-09-27 20:29:19 +02:00
Xiretza
7507ee29fc Migrate "expected identifier" diagnostics to diagnostic structs 2022-09-27 20:29:19 +02:00
Xiretza
21b5194a3a Rework "inner attribute not permitted" errors 2022-09-27 20:29:19 +02:00
Xiretza
4d0519a4e7 Remove error condition in parse_attribute 
This function is only ever called when the `#` has already been
consumed, no need to produce an error message here.
 2022-09-27 20:29:19 +02:00
Xiretza
e1b1d7b029 Migrate more rustc_parse diagnostics to diagnostic structs 2022-09-27 20:29:18 +02:00
Xiretza
e56d6a68db Move rustc_parse diagnostic structs to separate module 2022-09-27 20:29:18 +02:00
Xiretza
6ae7a30927 Migrate "invalid literal suffix" diagnostic to diagnostic structs 2022-09-27 20:29:18 +02:00
Xiretza
ab7c7dc7ce Migrate more diagnostics in rustc_parse to diagnostic structs 2022-09-27 20:29:18 +02:00
Michael Goulet
594134d873 Structured suggestion for missing mut/const in pointer 2022-09-27 02:47:07 +00:00
Nicholas Nethercote
7f7e2165b1 Rename some variables. 
These make the delimiter processing clearer.
 2022-09-27 12:04:03 +10:00
Takayuki Maeda
4f44dee501 add a label to struct/enum/union ident name 2022-09-27 10:28:50 +09:00
Takayuki Maeda
e123a61297 create a new local var 2022-09-27 10:22:46 +09:00
Nicholas Nethercote
880ebb657a Minor improvements. 
Add some comments, and mark one path as unreachable.
 2022-09-27 09:53:04 +10:00
Matthias Krüger
6f5e8c2ed4
Rollup merge of #102286 - compiler-errors:recover-semi-in-block-item, r=davidtwco 
Recover some items that expect braces and don't take semicolons

Fixes #102262
 2022-09-26 19:19:21 +02:00
Pietro Albini
3975d55d98
remove cfg(bootstrap) 2022-09-26 10:14:45 +02:00
bors
72f4923979 Auto merge of #102297 - fee1-dead-contrib:rollup-2np0cre, r=fee1-dead 
Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #102143 (Recover from struct nested in struct)
 - #102178 (bootstrap: the backtrace feature is stable, no need to allow it any more)
 - #102197 (Stabilize const `BTree{Map,Set}::new`)
 - #102267 (Don't set RUSTC in the bootstrap build script)
 - #102270 (Remove benches from `rustc_middle`)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
 2022-09-26 05:27:43 +00:00
Nicholas Nethercote
fb4dba0a17 Inline and remove cook_lexer_token. 
This is a small performance win, alas.
 2022-09-26 13:50:13 +10:00
Nicholas Nethercote
da84f0f4c3 Add rustc_lexer::TokenKind::Eof. 
For alignment with `rust_ast::TokenKind::Eof`. Plus it's a bit faster,
due to less `Option` manipulation in `StringReader::next_token`.
 2022-09-26 13:48:08 +10:00
Nicholas Nethercote
ceb25d125f Use less DRY in cook_lexer_token. 
This is a case where a small amount of repetition results in code that
is faster and easier to read.
 2022-09-26 13:41:58 +10:00
Nicholas Nethercote
aa6bfaf04b Make rustc_lexer::cursor::Cursor public. 
`Cursor` is currently hidden, and the main tokenization path uses
`rustc_lexer::first_token` which involves constructing a new `Cursor`
for every single token, which is weird. Also, `first_token` also can't
handle empty input, so callers have to check for that first.

This commit makes `Cursor` public, so `StringReader` can contain a
`Cursor`, which results in a simpler structure. The commit also changes
`StringReader::advance_token` so it returns an `Option<Token>`,
simplifying the the empty input case.
 2022-09-26 13:36:35 +10:00
Nicholas Nethercote
33516ac09a [ui] Rearrange StringReader/TokenTreesReader creation. 
`TokenTreesReader` wraps a `StringReader`, but the `into_token_trees`
function obscures this. This commit moves to a more straightforward
control flow.
 2022-09-26 13:35:46 +10:00
Nicholas Nethercote
33ba2776c9 Remove ast::Token::take. 
Instead of replacing `TokenTreesReader::token` in two steps, we can just
do it in one, which is both simpler and faster.
 2022-09-26 13:35:43 +10:00
Nicholas Nethercote
5b2075e03d Remove TokenTreesReader::bump. 
It's an unnecessary layer that obfuscates when I am looking for
optimizations.
 2022-09-26 13:34:04 +10:00
Nicholas Nethercote
d7928a92e5 Clarify spacing computation. 
The spacing computation is done in two parts. In the first part
`next_token` and `bump` use `Spacing::Alone` to mean "preceded by
whitespace" and `Spacing::Joint` to mean the opposite. In the second
part `parse_token_tree_other` then adjusts the `spacing` value to mean
the usual thing (i.e. "is the following token joinable punctuation?").
This shift in meaning is very confusing and it took me some time to
understand what was going on.

This commit changes the first part to use a bool, and adds some
comments, which makes things much clearer.
 2022-09-26 13:21:26 +10:00
Nicholas Nethercote
9640d1c023 Move #! checking. 
Currently does the "is this a `#!` at the start of the file?" check for
every single token(!)

This commit moves it so it only happens once.
 2022-09-26 13:19:14 +10:00
Michael Goulet
4d0d688a3c Recover some items that expect braces and don't take semicolons 2022-09-25 22:34:25 +00:00
Nicholas Nethercote
14281e6147 Remove unnecessary spacing assignment. 
It has no useful effect.
 2022-09-26 08:28:45 +10:00
Nicholas Nethercote
66e9b1149c Rearrange TokenTreesReader::parse_token_tree. 
`parse_token_tree` is basically a match with four arms: `Eof`,
`OpenDelim`, `CloseDelim`, and "other". It has two call sites, and at
each call site one of the arms is unreachable. It's also not inlined.

This commit removes `parse_token_tree` by splitting it into four
functions and inlining them. This avoids some repeated conditional
tests and also some non-inlined function calls on the hot path.
 2022-09-26 08:28:45 +10:00
Rageking8
a1062b9bdc
recover from struct nested in struct 2022-09-22 23:41:38 +08:00
Xiretza
ae56d2a118 Add missing code="" attributes to suggestion subdiagnostics 2022-09-22 17:25:50 +02:00
Jhonny Bill Mena
e52e2344dc FIX - adopt new Diagnostic naming in newly migrated modules 
FIX - ambiguous Diagnostic link in docs

UPDATE - rename diagnostic_items to IntoDiagnostic and AddToDiagnostic

[Gardening] FIX - formatting via `x fmt`

FIX - rebase conflicts. NOTE: Confirm wheather or not we want to handle TargetDataLayoutErrorsWrapper this way

DELETE - unneeded allow attributes in Handler method

FIX - broken test

FIX - Rebase conflict

UPDATE - rename residual _SessionDiagnostic and fix LintDiag link
 2022-09-21 11:43:22 -04:00
Jhonny Bill Mena
5f91719f75 UPDATE - rename SessionSubdiagnostic macro to Subdiagnostic 
Also renames:
- sym::AddSubdiagnostic to sym:: Subdiagnostic
- rustc_diagnostic_item = "AddSubdiagnostic" to rustc_diagnostic_item = "Subdiagnostic"
 2022-09-21 11:39:53 -04:00
Jhonny Bill Mena
a3396b2070 UPDATE - rename DiagnosticHandler macro to Diagnostic 2022-09-21 11:39:53 -04:00
Jhonny Bill Mena
19b348fed4 UPDATE - rename DiagnosticHandler trait to IntoDiagnostic 2022-09-21 11:39:52 -04:00
Jhonny Bill Mena
5b8152807c UPDATE - move SessionDiagnostic from rustc_session to rustc_errors 2022-09-21 11:39:52 -04:00
bors
b79b7d8b4e Auto merge of #101846 - chenyukang:fix-101793, r=davidtwco 
Fix the wording of help msg for bitwise not

Fixes #101793
 2022-09-21 12:32:54 +00:00
Michael Howell
14b27cfd11
Rollup merge of #100250 - cjgillot:recover-token-stream, r=Aaron1011 
Manually cleanup token stream when macro expansion aborts.

In case of syntax error in macro expansion, the expansion code can decide to stop processing anything. In that case, the token stream is malformed. This makes downstream users, like derive macros, ICE.

In this case, this PR manually cleans up the token stream by closing all currently open delimiters.

Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/96818.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/80447.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/81920.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/91023.
 2022-09-20 10:12:56 -07:00
Dylan DPC
3ad81e0dd8
Rollup merge of #93628 - est31:stabilize_let_else, r=joshtriplett 
Stabilize `let else`

🎉  **Stabilizes the `let else` feature, added by [RFC 3137](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3137).** 🎉

Reference PR: https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1156

closes #87335 (`let else` tracking issue)

FCP: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1029383585

----------

## Stabilization report

### Summary

The feature allows refutable patterns in `let` statements if the expression is
followed by a diverging `else`:

```Rust
fn get_count_item(s: &str) -> (u64, &str) {
    let mut it = s.split(' ');
    let (Some(count_str), Some(item)) = (it.next(), it.next()) else {
        panic!("Can't segment count item pair: '{s}'");
    };
    let Ok(count) = u64::from_str(count_str) else {
        panic!("Can't parse integer: '{count_str}'");
    };
    (count, item)
}
assert_eq!(get_count_item("3 chairs"), (3, "chairs"));
```

### Differences from the RFC / Desugaring

Outside of desugaring I'm not aware of any differences between the implementation and the RFC. The chosen desugaring has been changed from the RFC's [original](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3137-let-else.html#reference-level-explanations). You can read a detailed discussion of the implementation history of it in `@cormacrelf` 's [summary](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1041143670) in this thread, as well as the [followup](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1046598419). Since that followup, further changes have happened to the desugaring, in #98574, #99518, #99954. The later changes were mostly about the drop order: On match, temporaries drop in the same order as they would for a `let` declaration. On mismatch, temporaries drop before the `else` block.

### Test cases

In chronological order as they were merged.

Added by df9a2e0687895731e12f4a2651e8d70acd08872d (#87688):

* [`ui/pattern/usefulness/top-level-alternation.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/pattern/usefulness/top-level-alternation.rs) to ensure the unreachable pattern lint visits patterns inside `let else`.

Added by 5b95df4bdc330f34213812ad65cae86ced90d80c (#87688):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-bool-binop-init.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-bool-binop-init.rs) to ensure that no lazy boolean expressions (using `&&` or `||`) are allowed in the expression, as the RFC mandates.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-brace-before-else.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-brace-before-else.rs) to ensure that no `}` directly preceding the `else` is allowed in the expression, as the RFC mandates.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-check.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-check.rs) to ensure that `#[allow(...)]` attributes added to the entire `let` statement apply for the `else` block.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-irrefutable.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-irrefutable.rs) to ensure that the `irrefutable_let_patterns` lint fires.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-missing-semicolon.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-missing-semicolon.rs) to ensure the presence of semicolons at the end of the `let` statement.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-non-diverging.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-non-diverging.rs) to ensure the `else` block diverges.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-run-pass.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-run-pass.rs) to ensure the feature works in some simple test case settings.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-scope.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-scope.rs) to ensure the bindings created by the outer `let` expression are not available in the `else` block of it.

Added by bf7c32a4477a76bfd18fdcd8f45a939cbed82d34 (#89965):

* [`ui/let-else/issue-89960.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/issue-89960.rs) as a regression test for the ICE-on-error bug #89960 . Later in 102b9125e1cefbb8ed8408d2db3f9f7d5afddbf0 this got removed in favour of more comprehensive tests.

Added by 856541963ce95ef4f7d4a81784bb5002ccf63c93 (#89974):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-if.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-if.rs) to test for the improved error message that points out that `let else if` is not possible.

Added by 9b45713b6c1775f0103a1ebee6ab7c6d9b781a21:

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-allow-unused.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-allow-unused.rs) as a regression test for #89807, to ensure that `#[allow(...)]` attributes added to the entire `let` statement apply for bindings created by the `let else` pattern.

Added by 61bcd8d3075471b3867428788c49f54fffe53f52 (#89841):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-non-copy.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-non-copy.rs) to ensure that a copy is performed out of non-copy wrapper types. This mirrors `if let` behaviour. The test case bases on rustc internal changes originally meant for #89933 but then removed from the PR due to the error prior to the improvements of #89841.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-source-expr-nomove-pass.rs `](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-source-expr-nomove-pass.rs) to ensure that while there is a move of the binding in the successful case, the `else` case can still access the non-matching value. This mirrors `if let` behaviour.

Added by 102b9125e1cefbb8ed8408d2db3f9f7d5afddbf0 (#89841):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-ref-bindings.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-ref-bindings.rs) and [`ui/let-else/let-else-ref-bindings-pass.rs `](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-ref-bindings-pass.rs) to check `ref` and `ref mut` keywords in the pattern work correctly and error when needed.

Added by 2715c5f984fda7faa156d1c9cf91aa4934f0e00f (#89841):

* Match ergonomic tests adapted from the `rfc2005` test suite.

Added by fec8a507a27de1b08a0b95592dc8ec93bf0a321a (#89841):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-deref-coercion-annotated.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-deref-coercion-annotated.rs) and [`ui/let-else/let-else-deref-coercion.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-deref-coercion.rs) to check deref coercions.

#### Added since this stabilization report was originally written (2022-02-09)

Added by 76ea56667703ac06689ff1d6fba5d170fa7392a7 (#94211):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-destructuring.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.63.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-destructuring.rs) to give a nice error message if an user tries to do an assignment with a (possibly refutable) pattern and an `else` block, like asked for in #93995.

Added by e7730dcb7eb29a10ee73f269f4dc6e9d606db0da (#94208):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-allow-in-expr.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-allow-in-expr.rs) to test whether `#[allow(unused_variables)]` works in the expr, as well as its non presence, as well as putting it on the entire `let else` *affects* the expr, too. This was adding a missing test as pointed out by the stabilization report.
* Expansion of `ui/let-else/let-else-allow-unused.rs` and `ui/let-else/let-else-check.rs` to ensure that non-presence of `#[allow(unused)]` does issue the unused lint. This was adding a missing test case as pointed out by the stabilization report.

Added by 5bd71063b3810d977aa376d1e6dd7cec359330cc (#94208):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-slicing-error.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-slicing-error.rs), a regression test for #92069, which got fixed without addition of a regression test. This resolves a missing test as pointed out by the stabilization report.

Added by 5374688e1d8cbcff7d1d14bb34e38fe6fe7c233e (#98574):

* [`src/test/ui/async-await/async-await-let-else.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/async-await/async-await-let-else.rs) to test the interaction of async/await with `let else`

Added by 6c529ded8674b89c46052da92399227c3b764c6a (#98574):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs) as a (partial) regression test for #98672

Added by 9b566401068cb8450912f6ab48f3d0e60f5cb482 (#99518):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temp-borrowck.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs) as a regression test for #93951
* Extension of `src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs` to include a partial regression test for #98672 (especially regarding `else` drop order)

Added by baf9a7cb57120ec1411196214fd0d1c33fb18bf6 (#99518):

* Extension of `src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs` to include a partial regression test for #93951, similar to `let-else-temp-borrowck.rs`

Added by 60be2de8b7b8a1c4eee7e065b8cef38ea629a6a3 (#99518):

* Extension of `src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs` to include a program that can now be compiled thanks to borrow checker implications of #99518

Added by 47a7a91c969ed2edd12c674ca05c1baf867f6f6f (#100132):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/issue-100103.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/issue-100103.rs), as a regression test for #100103, to ensure that there is no ICE when doing `Err(...)?` inside else blocks.

Added by e3c5bd617d040b5ee0bc79e6e7f01772adce791b (#100443):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-then-diverge.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-then-diverge.rs), to verify that there is no unreachable code error with the current desugaring.

Added by 981852677c531d52f701b870bb27b45668a44d52 (#100443):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/issue-94176.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/issue-94176.rs), to make sure that a correct span is emitted for a missing trailing expression error. Regression test for #94176.

Added by e182d12a8493b40a557394325a3a713b6528de60 (#100434):

* [src/test/ui/unpretty/pretty-let-else.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/unpretty/pretty-let-else.rs), as a regression test to ensure pretty printing works for `let else` (this bug surfaced in many different ways)

Added by e26285603ca8b83b9d06e56f74e10e3d410553ff (#99954):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs) extended to contain & borrows as well, as this was identified as an earlier issue with the desugaring: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/98672#issuecomment-1200196921

Added by 2d8460ef43d902f34ba2133fe38f66ee8d2fdafc (#99291):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-drop-order.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-drop-order.rs) a matrix based test for various drop order behaviour of `let else`. Especially, it verifies equality of `let` and `let else` drop orders, [resolving](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1238498468) a [stabilization blocker](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1055738523).

Added by 1b87ce0d4092045728c1c68282769d555706f273 (#101410):

* Edit to `src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs` to add the `-Zvalidate-mir` flag, as a regression test for #99228

Added by af591ebe4d0cf2097a5fdc0bb710442d0f2e7876 (#101410):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/issue-99975.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/issue-99975.rs) as a regression test for the ICE #99975.

Added by this PR:

* `ui/let-else/let-else.rs`, a simple run-pass check, similar to `ui/let-else/let-else-run-pass.rs`.

### Things not currently tested

* ~~The `#[allow(...)]` tests check whether allow works, but they don't check whether the non-presence of allow causes a lint to fire.~~ → *test added by e7730dcb7eb29a10ee73f269f4dc6e9d606db0da*
* ~~There is no `#[allow(...)]` test for the expression, as there are tests for the pattern and the else block.~~ → *test added by e7730dcb7eb29a10ee73f269f4dc6e9d606db0da*
* ~~`let-else-brace-before-else.rs` forbids the `let ... = {} else {}` pattern and there is a rustfix to obtain `let ... = ({}) else {}`. I'm not sure whether the `.fixed` files are checked by the tooling that they compile. But if there is no such check, it would be neat to make sure that `let ... = ({}) else {}` compiles.~~ → *test added by e7730dcb7eb29a10ee73f269f4dc6e9d606db0da*
* ~~#92069 got closed as fixed, but no regression test was added. Not sure it's worth to add one.~~ → *test added by 5bd71063b3810d977aa376d1e6dd7cec359330cc*
* ~~consistency between `let else` and `if let` regarding lifetimes and drop order: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1055738523~~ → *test added by 2d8460ef43d902f34ba2133fe38f66ee8d2fdafc*

Edit: they are all tested now.

### Possible future work / Refutable destructuring assignments

[RFC 2909](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/2909-destructuring-assignment.html) specifies destructuring assignment, allowing statements like `FooBar { a, b, c } = foo();`.
As it was stabilized, destructuring assignment only allows *irrefutable* patterns, which before the advent of `let else` were the only patterns that `let` supported.
So the combination of `let else` and destructuring assignments gives reason to think about extensions of the destructuring assignments feature that allow refutable patterns, discussed in #93995.

A naive mapping of `let else` to destructuring assignments in the form of `Some(v) = foo() else { ... };` might not be the ideal way. `let else` needs a diverging `else` clause as it introduces new bindings, while assignments have a default behaviour to fall back to if the pattern does not match, in the form of not performing the assignment. Thus, there is no good case to require divergence, or even an `else` clause at all, beyond the need for having *some* introducer syntax so that it is clear to readers that the assignment is not a given (enums and structs look similar). There are better candidates for introducer syntax however than an empty `else {}` clause, like `maybe` which could be added as a keyword on an edition boundary:

```Rust
let mut v = 0;
maybe Some(v) = foo(&v);
maybe Some(v) = foo(&v) else { bar() };
```

Further design discussion is left to an RFC, or the linked issue.
 2022-09-17 15:31:06 +05:30
Guillaume Gomez
9a72ded562
Rollup merge of #101859 - Rageking8:slight-vertical-formatting, r=compiler-errors 
Slight vertical formatting
 2022-09-16 13:07:18 +02:00
yukang
484b612909 use subdiagnostic for logical negation, bitwise not 2022-09-16 14:41:42 +08:00
est31
173eb6f407 Only enable the let_else feature on bootstrap 
On later stages, the feature is already stable.

Result of running:

rg -l "feature.let_else" compiler/ src/librustdoc/ library/ | xargs sed -s -i "s#\\[feature.let_else#\\[cfg_attr\\(bootstrap, feature\\(let_else\\)#"
 2022-09-15 21:06:45 +02:00