Instead of calling `builder.delete` for every text range we find with
`process_usage`, we now ensure that the ranges do not overlap before removing
them. If a range is fully contained by a prior one, it is dropped.
fixes#12784
Add simple support for completion item details
Supercedes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/9891
This doesn't yet really implement anything new, it just adds the scaffolding for the protocol conversion
Bump minimist from 1.2.5 to 1.2.6 in /editors/code
Bumps [minimist](https://github.com/substack/minimist) from 1.2.5 to 1.2.6.
<details>
<summary>Commits</summary>
<ul>
<li><a href="7efb22a518"><code>7efb22a</code></a> 1.2.6</li>
<li><a href="ef88b9325f"><code>ef88b93</code></a> security notice for additional prototype pollution issue</li>
<li><a href="c2b981977f"><code>c2b9819</code></a> isConstructorOrProto adapted from PR</li>
<li><a href="bc8ecee438"><code>bc8ecee</code></a> test from prototype pollution PR</li>
<li>See full diff in <a href="https://github.com/substack/minimist/compare/1.2.5...1.2.6">compare view</a></li>
</ul>
</details>
<br />
[](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores)
Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting ``@dependabot` rebase`.
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start)
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end)
---
<details>
<summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary>
<br />
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
- ``@dependabot` rebase` will rebase this PR
- ``@dependabot` recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
- ``@dependabot` merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
- ``@dependabot` squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
- ``@dependabot` cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
- ``@dependabot` reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed
- ``@dependabot` close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
- ``@dependabot` ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- ``@dependabot` ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- ``@dependabot` ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- ``@dependabot` use these labels` will set the current labels as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
- ``@dependabot` use these reviewers` will set the current reviewers as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
- ``@dependabot` use these assignees` will set the current assignees as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
- ``@dependabot` use this milestone` will set the current milestone as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
You can disable automated security fix PRs for this repo from the [Security Alerts page](https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/network/alerts).
</details>
fix: make file watcher config a drop-down (and clarify the options)
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/12794
Also renames "notify" to "server", since that's clearer ("notify" is still accepted for compatibility).
minor: Remove macro ABI version from doc comment
It's hard to remember to keep this in sync, but since the file path already contains the version, this comment is pretty unnecessary.
internal: Remove outdated proc macro ABIs
Drops support for 1.48 to 1.57. We still support 1.58+, which is 4 versions out of date, so that should be plenty.
Fix extract variable assist for subexpression in mutable borrow
This checks if the expression is in a mutable borrow and if so makes the extracted variable `mut`.
Closes#12786
ToString is implemented by many different types than &str, and
represents a serialization into string data. The fact that said data is
returned as owned, is an implementation detail.
If merely copying borrowed string data to owned string data is all that
is desired, ToOwned is a much better choice, because if the user later
refactors the code such that the input is no longer an `&str`, then they
will get a compiler error instead of a mysterious change-in-behavior.
feat: Support the 1.64 nightly proc macro ABI
Should resolve https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/12600
Not sure why I thought the Rust version was the same as on beta, that's never the case (but future nightly changes can break the ABI again).
fix: Stack overflows and wrong type inference of associated type shorthands
This fixes `generic_predicates_for_param_query` comparing local IDs that belong to different definitions.
As the query is used in multiple places this fix affects various r-a features when an associated type shorthand and `impl Trait` involved. Notably inference, goto, completion, hover.
Fixes#12484
internal: Record all macro definitions in ItemScope
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/12100
Doesn't resolve the shadowing issues though, fixing those is gonna be really tricky I believe unless we can come up with a nice scheme to "order" item tree items (using syntax ranges and file ids would be a pain and also a bad idea since that'll require us to potentially reparse files in collection).
Automatically instaciate trivially instaciable structs in "Generate new" and "Fill struct fields"
As proposed in #12535 this PR changes the "Generate new" and "Fill struct fields" assist/diagnostic to instanciate structs with no fields and enums with a single empty variant.
For example:
```rust
pub enum Bar {
Bar {},
}
struct Foo<T> {
a: usize,
bar: Bar,
_phantom: std::marker::PhantomData<T>,
}
impl<T> Foo<T> {
/* generate new */
fn random() -> Self {
Self { /* Fill struct fields */ }
}
}
```
was previously:
```rust
impl<T> Foo<T> {
fn new(a: usize, bar: Bar, _phantom: std::marker::PhantomData<T>) -> Self {
Self { a, bar, _phantom }
}
fn random() -> Self {
Self {
a: todo!(),
bar: todo!(),
_phantom: todo!(),
}
}
}
```
and is now:
```rust
impl<T> Foo<T> {
fn new(a: usize) -> Self {
Self {
a,
bar: Bar::Bar {},
_phantom: std::marker::PhantomData
}
}
fn random() -> Self {
Self {
a: todo!(),
bar: Bar::Bar {},
_phantom: std::marker::PhantomData,
}
}
}
```
I'd be happy about any suggestions.
## TODO
- [x] deduplicate `use_trivial_constructor` (unclear how to do as it's used in two separate crates)
- [x] write tests
Closes#12535
fix: Improve syntax fixup a bit, handle incomplete `if`
- allow appending tokens after a token, not just a node
- allow inserting delimiters (and remove them again)
- fix up `if {}` and `if` without anything following
- allow appending tokens after a token, not just a node
- allow inserting delimiters (and remove them again)
- fix up `if {}` and `if` without anything following
fix: Support generics in extract_function assist
This change attempts to resolve issue #7636: Extract into Function does not
create a generic function with constraints when extracting generic code.
In `FunctionBody::analyze_container`, we now traverse the `ancestors` in search
of `AnyHasGenericParams`, and attach any `GenericParamList`s and `WhereClause`s
we find to the `ContainerInfo`.
Later, in `format_function`, we collect all the `GenericParam`s and
`WherePred`s from the container, and filter them to keep only types matching
`TypeParam`s used within the newly extracted function body or param list. We
can then include the new `GenericParamList` and `WhereClause` in the new
function definition.
This change only impacts `TypeParam`s. `LifetimeParam`s and `ConstParam`s are
out of scope for this change.
I've never contributed to this project before, but I did try to follow the style guide. I believe that this change represents an improvement over the status quo, but I think it's also fair to argue that it doesn't fully "fix" the linked issue. I'm totally open to merging this as is, or going further to try to make a more complete solution. Also: if there are other unit or integration tests I should add, please let me know where to look!
