4851: Add quickfix to add a struct field r=TimoFreiberg a=TimoFreiberg
Related to #4563
I created a quickfix for record literals first because the NoSuchField diagnostic was already there.
To offer that quickfix for FieldExprs with unknown fields I'd need to add a new diagnostic (or create a `NoSuchField` diagnostic for those cases)
I think it'd make sense to make this a snippet completion (to select the generated type), but this would require changing the `Analysis` API and I'd like some feedback before I touch that.
Co-authored-by: Timo Freiberg <timo.freiberg@gmail.com>
4903: Add highlighting support for doc comments r=matklad a=Nashenas88
The language server protocol includes a semantic modifier for documentation. This change exports that modifier for doc comments so users can choose to highlight them differently compared to regular comments.
Example:
<img width="375" alt="Screen Shot 2020-06-16 at 10 34 14 AM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1673130/84788271-f6599580-afbc-11ea-96e5-7a0215da620b.png">
CC @woody77
Co-authored-by: Paul Daniel Faria <Nashenas88@users.noreply.github.com>
We might as well handle them internally, via queries.
I am not sure, but it looks like the current LibraryData setup might
even predate salsa? It's not really needed and creates a bunch of
complexity.
4913: Remove debugging code for incremental sync r=matklad a=lnicola
4915: Inspect markdown code fences to determine whether to apply syntax highlighting r=matklad a=ltentrup
Fixes#4904
4916: Warnings as hint or info r=matklad a=GabbeV
Fixes#4229
This PR is my second attempt at providing a solution to the above issue. My last PR(#4721) had to be rolled back(#4862) due to it overriding behavior many users expected. This PR solves a broader problem while trying to minimize surprises for the users.
### Problem description
The underlying problem this PR tries to solve is the mismatch between [Rustc lint levels](https://doc.rust-lang.org/rustc/lints/levels.html) and [LSP diagnostic severity](https://microsoft.github.io/language-server-protocol/specification#diagnostic). Rustc currently doesn't have a lint level less severe than warning forcing the user to disable warnings if they think they get to noisy. LSP however provides two severitys below warning, information and hint. This allows editors like VSCode to provide more fine grained control over how prominently to show different diagnostics.
Info severity shows a blue squiggly underline in code and can be filtered separately from errors and warnings in the problems panel.
Hint severity doesn't show up in the problems panel at all and only show three dots under the affected code or just faded text if the diagnostic also has the unnecessary tag.
### Solution
The solution provided by this PR allows the user to configure lists of of warnings to report as info severity and hint severity respectively. I purposefully only convert warnings and not errors as i believe it's a good idea to have the editor show the same severity as the compiler as much as possible.
### Open questions
#### Discoverability
How do we teach this to new and existing users? Should a section be added to the user manual? If so where and what should it say?
#### Defaults
Other languages such as TypeScript report unused code as hint by default. Should rust-analyzer similarly report some problems as hint/info by default?
Co-authored-by: Laurențiu Nicola <lnicola@dend.ro>
Co-authored-by: Leander Tentrup <leander.tentrup@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Gabriel Valfridsson <gabriel.valfridsson@gmail.com>
Anchoring to the SourceRoot wont' work if the path is absolute:
#[path = "/tmp/foo.rs"]
mod foo;
Anchoring to a file will.
However, we *should* anchor, instead of just producing an abs path.
I can imagine a situation where, for example, rust-analyzer processes
crates from different machines (or, for example, from in-memory git
branch), where the same absolute path in different crates might refer
to different files in the end!
This commit adds a function that tries to determine the syntax highlighting class of NAME_REFs based on the usage.
It is used for highlighting injections (such as highlighting of doctests) as the semantic logic will most of the time result in unresolved references.
It also adds a color to unresolved references in HTML encoding.
4849: Make known paths use `core` instead of `std` r=matklad a=jonas-schievink
I'm not sure if this causes problems today, but it seems like it easily could, if rust-analyzer processes the libstd sources for the right `--target` and that target is a `#![no_std]`-only target.
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonas.schievink@ferrous-systems.com>
