11182: fix: don't panic on seeing an unexpected offset r=Veykril a=dimbleby
Intended as a fix, or at least a sticking plaster, for #11081.
I have arranged that [offset()](1ba9a924d7/crates/ide_db/src/line_index.rs (L105-L107)) returns `Option<TextSize>` instead of going out of bounds; other changes are the result of following the compiler after doing this.
Perhaps there's still an issue here - I suppose the server and client have gotten out of sync and that probably shouldn't happen in the first place? I see that https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/10138#issuecomment-913727554 suggests what sounds like a more substantial fix which I think might be aimed in this direction. So perhaps that one should be left open to cover such things?
Meanwhile, I hope that not-crashing is a good improvement: and I can confirm that it works out just fine in the repro I have at #11081.
Co-authored-by: David Hotham <david.hotham@metaswitch.com>
This patch makes RA understand `#![recursion_limit = "N"]` annotations.
- `crate_limits` query is moved to `DefDatabase`
- `DefMap` now has `recursion_limit: Option<u32>` field
This allows fetching crate limits like `recursion_limit`. The
implementation is currently dummy and just returns the defaults.
Future work: Use this query instead of the hardcoded constant.
Future work: Actually implement this query by parsing
`#![recursion_limit = N]` attribute.
11281: ide: parallel prime caches r=jonas-schievink a=jhgg
cache priming goes brrrr... the successor to #10149
---
this PR implements a parallel cache priming strategy that uses a topological work queue to feed a pool of worker threads the crates to index in parallel.
## todo
- [x] should we keep the old prime caches?
- [x] we should use num_cpus to detect how many cpus to use to prime caches. should we also expose a config for # of worker CPU threads to use?
- [x] something is wonky with cancellation, need to figure it out before this can merge.
Co-authored-by: Jake Heinz <jh@discordapp.com>
