Make `fold_item_recur` non-nullable
This gets rid of a bunch of `unwrap()`s and makes it a little more clear
what's going on.
Originally I wanted to make `fold_item` non-nullable too, which would
have been a lot nicer to work with, but unfortunately `stripper` does
actually return `None` in some places. I might make a follow-up moving
stripper to be special and not a pass so that passes can be
non-nullable.
Found while working on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/76998.
Add exploit mitigations chapter to the rustc book
This section documents the exploit mitigations applicable to the Rust compiler when building programs for the Linux operating system on the AMD64 architecture and equivalent. This was done for a project I'm currently working on, and I hope it'll also be helpful to others.
Currently you can get a list of lints and lint groups by running `rustc
-Whelp`. This prints an additional line at the end:
```
Compiler plugins can provide additional lints and lint groups. To see a
listing of these, re-run `rustc -W help` with a crate filename.
```
Clippy is such a "compiler plugin", that provides additional lints.
Running `clippy-driver -Whelp` (`rustc` wrapper) still only prints the
rustc lints with the above message at the end. But when running
`clippy-driver -Whelp main.rs`, where `main.rs` is any rust file, it
also prints Clippy lints. I don't think this is a good approach from a
UX perspective: Why is a random file necessary to print a help message?
This commit changes this behavior: Whenever a compiler callback
registers lints, it is assumed that these lints come from a plugin and
are printed without having to specify a Rust source file.
resolve: Do not put macros into `module.unexpanded_invocations` unless necessary
Macro invocations in modules <sup>(*)</sup> need to be tracked because they can produce named items when expanded.
We cannot give definite answer to queries like "does this module declare name `n`?" until all macro calls in that module are expanded.
Previously we marked too many macros as potentially producing named items.
E.g. in this example
```rust
mod m {
const C: u32 = line!();
}
```
`line!()` cannot emit any items into module `m`, but it was still marked.
This PR fixes that and marks macro calls as "unexpanded in module" only if they can actually emit named items into that module.
Diagnostics in UI test outputs have different order now because this change affects macro expansion order.
<sup>*</sup> Any containers for named items are called modules in resolve (that includes blocks, traits and enums in addition to `mod` items).
This section documents the exploit mitigations applicable to the Rust
compiler when building programs for the Linux operating system on the
AMD64 architecture and equivalent.
This is useful for embedded targets where small code size is desired.
For example, on my project (thumbv7em-none-eabi) this yields a 0.6% code size reduction.
Changes the coverage map injected into binaries compiled with
`-Zinstrument-coverage` to LLVM Coverage Mapping Format, Version 4 (from
Version 3). Note, binaries compiled with this version will require LLVM
tools from at least LLVM Version 11.
They were originally called "opt-in, built-in traits" (OIBITs), but
people realized that the name was too confusing and a mouthful, and so
they were renamed to just "auto traits". The feature flag's name wasn't
updated, though, so that's what this PR does.
There are some other spots in the compiler that still refer to OIBITs,
but I don't think changing those now is worth it since they are internal
and not particularly relevant to this PR.
Also see <https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/opt-in.2C.20built-in.20traits.20(auto.20traits).20feature.20name>.
They were originally called "opt-in, built-in traits" (OIBITs), but
people realized that the name was too confusing and a mouthful, and so
they were renamed to just "auto traits". The feature flag's name wasn't
updated, though, so that's what this PR does.
There are some other spots in the compiler that still refer to OIBITs,
but I don't think changing those now is worth it since they are internal
and not particularly relevant to this PR.
Also see <https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/opt-in.2C.20built-in.20traits.20(auto.20traits).20feature.20name>.
Qualify `panic!` as `core::panic!` in non-built-in `core` macros
Fixes#78333.
-----
Otherwise code like this
#![no_implicit_prelude]
fn main() {
::std::todo!();
::std::unimplemented!();
}
will fail to compile, which is unfortunate and presumably unintended.
This changes many invocations of `panic!` in a `macro_rules!` definition
to invocations of `$crate::panic!`, which makes the invocations hygienic.
Note that this does not make the built-in macro `assert!` hygienic.
Otherwise code like this
#![no_implicit_prelude]
fn main() {
::std::todo!();
::std::unimplemented!();
}
will fail to compile, which is unfortunate and presumably unintended.
This changes many invocations of `panic!` in a `macro_rules!` definition
to invocations of `$crate::panic!`, which makes the invocations hygienic.
Note that this does not make the built-in macro `assert!` hygienic.
Drop support for all cloudabi targets
`cloudabi` is a tier-3 target, and [it is no longer being maintained upstream][no].
This PR drops supports for cloudabi targets. Those targets are:
* aarch64-unknown-cloudabi
* armv7-unknown-cloudabi
* i686-unknown-cloudabi
* x86_64-unknown-cloudabi
Since this drops supports for a target, I'd like somebody to tag `relnotes` label to this PR.
Some other issues:
* The tidy exception for `cloudabi` crate is still remained because
* `parking_lot v0.9.0` and `parking_lot v0.10.2` depends on `cloudabi v0.0.3`.
* `parking_lot v0.11.0` depends on `cloudabi v0.1.0`.
[no]: https://github.com/NuxiNL/cloudabi#note-this-project-is-unmaintained
Rollup of 10 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #76829 (stabilize const_int_pow)
- #79080 (MIR visitor: Don't treat debuginfo field access as a use of the struct)
- #79236 (const_generics: assert resolve hack causes an error)
- #79287 (Allow using generic trait methods in `const fn`)
- #79324 (Use Option::and_then instead of open-coding it)
- #79325 (Reduce boilerplate with the `?` operator)
- #79330 (Fix typo in comment)
- #79333 (doc typo)
- #79337 (Use Option::map instead of open coding it)
- #79343 (Add my (`@flip1995)` work mail to the mailmap)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Use Option::map instead of open coding it
r? `@jonas-schievink` since you're frequently sniping these minor cleanups anyway.
`@rustbot` modify labels +C-cleanup +T-compiler
Allow using generic trait methods in `const fn`
Next step for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/67792, this now also allows code like the following:
```rust
struct S;
impl const PartialEq for S {
fn eq(&self, _: &S) -> bool {
true
}
}
const fn equals_self<T: PartialEq>(t: &T) -> bool {
*t == *t
}
pub const EQ: bool = equals_self(&S);
```
This works by threading const-ness of trait predicates through trait selection, in particular through `ParamCandidate`, and exposing it in the resulting `ImplSource`.
Since this change makes two bounds `T: Trait` and `T: ?const Trait` that only differ in their const-ness be treated like different bounds, candidate winnowing has been changed to drop the `?const` candidate in favor of the const candidate, to avoid ambiguities when both a const and a non-const bound is present.
const_generics: assert resolve hack causes an error
prevent the min_const_generics `HACK`s in resolve from triggering a fallback path which successfully compiles so that we don't have to worry about future compat issues when removing it
r? `@eddyb` cc `@varkor`
Change slice::to_vec to not use extend_from_slice
I saw this [Zulip thread](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/219381-t-libs/topic/String.3A.3Afrom%28.26str%29.20wonky.20codegen/near/216164455), and didn't see any update from it, so I thought I'd try to fix it. This converts `to_vec` to no longer use `extend_from_slice`, but relies on knowing that the allocated capacity is the same size as the input.
[Godbolt new v1](https://rust.godbolt.org/z/1bcWKG)
[Godbolt new v2 w/ drop guard](https://rust.godbolt.org/z/5jn76K)
[Godbolt old version](https://rust.godbolt.org/z/e4ePav)
After some amount of iteration, there are now two specializations for `to_vec`, one for `Copy` types that use memcpy, and one for clone types which is the original from this PR.
This is then used inside of `impl<T: Clone> FromIterator<Iter::Slice<T>> for Vec<T>` which is essentially equivalent to `&[T] -> Vec<T>`, instead of previous specialization of the `extend` function. This is because extend has to reason more about existing capacity by calling `reserve` on an existing vec, and thus produces worse asm.
Downsides: This allocates the exact capacity, so I think if many items are added to this `Vec` after, it might need to allocate whereas extending may not. I also noticed the number of faults went up in the benchmarks, but not sure where from exactly.
