This is a squash of these commits:
- Update E0744 about control flow in `const` contexts to reflect current status of `const fn`.
- E0744 isn't just about `for` loops or control flow
- Fix formatting on E0744 cause my editor decided to not copy it well
- Improve wording
- Fix a markdown formatting error
- Fix E0744's description as I interpreted some code wrong
- Fix a minor wording issue again
- Add a few more links to blocking issues
- Improve links to tracking issues
Add a case to `lint_search_is_some` to handle searching strings
Fixes: #6010
This adds a lint which recommends using `contains()` instead of `find()` followed by `is_some()` on strings as suggested in #6010.
This was added as an additional case to
5af88e3c2d/clippy_lints/src/methods/mod.rs (L3037)
I would really appreciate any comments/suggestions for my code!
changelog: Added case to `lint_search_is_some` to handle searching strings
Now users will be able to do:
```
cargo build -Zbuild-std=core -Zbuild-std-features=compiler-builtins-asm
```
and correctly get the assembly implemenations for `memcpy` and friends.
BTreeMap: fix pointer provenance rules in underfullness
Continuing on #78480, and for readability, and possibly for performance: avoid aliasing when handling underfull nodes, and consolidate the code doing that. In particular:
- Avoid the rather explicit aliasing for internal nodes in `remove_kv_tracking`.
- Climb down to the root to handle underfull nodes using a reborrowed handle, rather than one copied with `ptr::read`, before resuming on the leaf level.
- Integrate the code tracking leaf edge position into the functions performing changes, rather than bolting it on.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
Install CI llvm into the library directory
In other words, my concern in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/78932#issuecomment-725781767 was perfectly justified by something we were already doing. For now just special case CI LLVM, but in the future we may want a more general fix.
Fixes#79071.
r? `@alexcrichton`
Clippy uses `ExprUseVisitor` and atleast in some cases it runs
after writeback.
We currently don't writeback the min_capture results of closure
capture analysis since no place within the compiler itself uses it.
In the short term to fix clippy we add a fallback when walking captures
of a closure to check if closure_capture analysis has any entries in it.
Writeback for closure_min_captures will be implemented in
rust-lang/project-rfc-2229#18
Fix displaying errors when rustbook tests fail.
This ensures that output from mdbook is displayed when running the rustbook wrapper. I believe this was a regression as a result of #69115 where it was changed from running `rustdoc` directly to using rustbook.
It seems that by default the 32-bit headers are not actually installed
when installing development tooling. As we're using gcc headers,
we need to install them as an extra package.
See for reference:
- https://stackoverflow.com/a/54082790
- https://askubuntu.com/a/106092
Also removed the now unused arm tooling
Move likely/unlikely argument outside of invisible unsafe block
The previous `likely!`/`unlikely!` macros were unsound because it permits the caller's expr to contain arbitrary unsafe code.
```rust
pub fn huh() -> bool {
likely!(std::ptr::read(&() as *const () as *const bool))
}
```
**Before:** compiles cleanly.
**After:**
```console
error[E0133]: call to unsafe function is unsafe and requires unsafe function or block
|
70 | likely!(std::ptr::read(&() as *const () as *const bool))
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ call to unsafe function
|
= note: consult the function's documentation for information on how to avoid undefined behavior
```
Implement BTreeMap::retain and BTreeSet::retain
Adds new methods `BTreeMap::retain` and `BTreeSet::retain`. These are implemented on top of `drain_filter` (#70530).
The API of these methods is identical to `HashMap::retain` and `HashSet::retain`, which were implemented in #39560 and stabilized in #36648. The docs and tests are also copied from HashMap/HashSet.
The new methods are unstable, behind the `btree_retain` feature gate, with tracking issue #79025. See also rust-lang/rfcs#1338.
astconv: extract closures into a separate trait
Am currently looking into completely removing `check_generic_arg_count` and `create_substs_for_generic_args` was somewhat difficult to understand for me so I moved these closures into a trait.
This should not have changed the behavior of any of these methods
Make `_` an expression, to discard values in destructuring assignments
This is the third and final step towards implementing destructuring assignment (RFC: rust-lang/rfcs#2909, tracking issue: #71126). This PR is the third and final part of #71156, which was split up to allow for easier review.
With this PR, an underscore `_` is parsed as an expression but is allowed *only* on the left-hand side of a destructuring assignment. There it simply discards a value, similarly to the wildcard `_` in patterns. For instance,
```rust
(a, _) = (1, 2)
```
will simply assign 1 to `a` and discard the 2. Note that for consistency,
```
_ = foo
```
is also allowed and equivalent to just `foo`.
Thanks to ````@varkor```` who helped with the implementation, particularly around pre-expansion gating.
r? ````@petrochenkov````
Make `_` an expression, to discard values in destructuring assignments
This is the third and final step towards implementing destructuring assignment (RFC: rust-lang/rfcs#2909, tracking issue: #71126). This PR is the third and final part of #71156, which was split up to allow for easier review.
With this PR, an underscore `_` is parsed as an expression but is allowed *only* on the left-hand side of a destructuring assignment. There it simply discards a value, similarly to the wildcard `_` in patterns. For instance,
```rust
(a, _) = (1, 2)
```
will simply assign 1 to `a` and discard the 2. Note that for consistency,
```
_ = foo
```
is also allowed and equivalent to just `foo`.
Thanks to ````@varkor```` who helped with the implementation, particularly around pre-expansion gating.
r? ````@petrochenkov````
cleanup: Remove `ParseSess::injected_crate_name`
Its only remaining use is in pretty-printing where the necessary information can be easily re-computed.
Allow making `RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP` conditional on the crate name
Motivation: This came up in the [Zulip stream](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/233931-t-compiler.2Fmajor-changes/topic/Require.20users.20to.20confirm.20they.20know.20RUSTC_.E2.80.A6.20compiler-team.23350/near/208403962) for https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/350.
See also https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/pull/6608#issuecomment-458546258; this implements https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues/6627.
The goal is for this to eventually allow prohibiting setting `RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP` in build.rs (https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues/7088).
## User-facing changes
- `RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP=1` still works; there is no current plan to remove this.
- Things like `RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP=0` no longer activate nightly features. In practice this shouldn't be a big deal, since `RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP` is the opposite of stable and everyone uses `RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP=1` anyway.
- `RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP=x` will enable nightly features only for crate `x`.
- `RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP=x,y` will enable nightly features only for crates `x` and `y`.
## Implementation changes
The main change is that `UnstableOptions::from_environment` now requires
an (optional) crate name. If the crate name is unknown (`None`), then the new feature is not available and you still have to use `RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP=1`. In practice this means the feature is only available for `--crate-name`, not for `#![crate_name]`; I'm interested in supporting the second but I'm not sure how.
Other major changes:
- Added `Session::is_nightly_build()`, which uses the `crate_name` of
the session
- Added `nightly_options::match_is_nightly_build`, a convenience method
for looking up `--crate-name` from CLI arguments.
`Session::is_nightly_build()`should be preferred where possible, since
it will take into account `#![crate_name]` (I think).
- Added `unstable_features` to `rustdoc::RenderOptions`
I'm not sure whether this counts as T-compiler or T-lang; _technically_ RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP is an implementation detail, but it's been used so much it seems like this counts as a language change too.
r? `@joshtriplett`
cc `@Mark-Simulacrum` `@hsivonen`
Now with LLVM 9 being the minimum supported version, we can
finally remove the hacks in the dockerfile.
This wasn't in the main PR bumping the version as I didn't quite
understand what's going on and needed here.
This is mostly me learning the codebase, so feel free to close the PR.
It does have the small benefit that we statically know rustdoc isn't
generating useless `span`s, though.
