[`useless_vec`]: lint on `vec![_]` invocations that adjust to a slice
Fixes#2262 (well, actually my PR over at #10901 did do most of the stuff, but this PR implements the one last other case mentioned in the comments that my PR didn't fix)
Before this change, it would lint `(&vec![1]).iter().sum::<i32>()`, but not `vec![1].iter().sum::<i32>()`. This PR handles this case.
This also refactors a few things that I wanted to do in my other PR but forgot about.
changelog: [`useless_vec`]: lint on `vec![_]` invocations that adjust to a slice
Don't linting `as_conversions` in proc macros
Don't linting `as_conversions` if code was generated by procedural macro.
This PR fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/9657
I implemented the fix changing the lint code to be a `LateLintPass` in order to be able to use the `is_from_proc_macro` out of the box. If the reviwer thinks that it would be better to do the other way (implementing `WithSearchPat`) just let me know. I might need some help in implementing it for the `ustc_ast::ast::Expr`
changelog: [`as_conversions`] avoiding warnings in macro-generated code
Extend `explicit_iter_loop` and `explicit_into_iter_loop`
fixes#1518
Some included cleanups
* Split `for_loop` test into different files for each lint (partially).
* Move handling of some `into_iter` cases from `explicit_into_iter`.
---
changelog: Enhancement: [`explicit_iter_loop`]: Now also handles types that implement `IntoIterator`.
[#10416](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/10416)
changelog: Sugg: [`explicit_into_iter_loop`]: The suggestion now works on mutable references.
[#10416](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/10416)
<!-- changelog_checked -->
Add `needless_if` lint
first off: Sorry about the large diff. Seems a ton of tests do this (understandably so).
this is basically everything I wanted in #10868, while it doesn't lint *all* unnecessary empty blocks, it lints needless if statements; which are basically the crux of the issue (for me) anyway. I've committed code that includes this far too many times 😅 hopefully clippy can help me out soon
closes#10868
changelog: New lint [`needless_if`]
handle exponent without digits in `numeric_literal`
Fixes#10912
The numeric literal util module didn't check for exponents with no digits.
So:
384cf37612/clippy_utils/src/numeric_literal.rs (L163-L168)
`exponent` here would be the empty string, which passed the `!= "0"` check (when it shouldn't have, it should probably be treated as if the user wrote `E0`), then later fails when counting the digits and subtracting one (0 - 1 = overflow).
Also, interestingly I can't even write a test for this because exponents with no digits is some kind of error by itself and `cargo dev fmt` fails on it.
changelog: [`unreadable_literal`]: don't (debug) ICE on numeric literal with empty exponent
Fix `diverging_sub_expression` not checking body of block
Fixes#10776
This also adds a warning to the test `ui/never_loop.rs`, not sure if this is correct or not.
changelog: [`diverging_sub_expression`]: Fix false negatives with body of block
[`unnecessary_to_owned`]: check that the adjusted type matches target
Fixes#10033.
Before this change, the lint would assume that removing the `.to_string()` in `f(&x.to_string())` would be ok if x is of some type that implements `Deref<Target = str>` and `f` takes a `&str`.
This turns out to not actually be ok if the `to_string` call is some method that exists on `x` directly, which happens if it implements `Display`/`ToString` itself.
changelog: [`unnecessary_to_owned`]: only lint if the adjusted receiver type actually matches
