Clarify what values `BorrowedHandle`, `OwnedHandle` etc. can hold.
Reword the documentation to clarify that when `BorrowedHandle`, `OwnedHandle`, or `HandleOrNull` hold the value `-1`, it always means the current process handle, and not `INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE`.
`-1` should only mean `INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE` after a call to a function documented to return that to report errors, which should lead I/O functions to produce errors rather than succeeding and producing `OwnedHandle` or `BorrowedHandle` values. So if a consumer of an `OwnedHandle` or `BorrowedHandle` ever sees them holding a `-1`, it should always mean the current process handle.
openbsd: convert futex timeout managment to Timespec usage
unbreak openbsd build after #96657
r? cuviper
please note I made `Timespec::zero()` public to be able to use it. OpenBSD is using relative timeout for `futex(2)` and I don't find simple way to use `Timespec` this way.
Add `sub_ptr` on pointers (the `usize` version of `offset_from`)
We have `add`/`sub` which are the `usize` versions of `offset`, this adds the `usize` equivalent of `offset_from`. Like how `.add(d)` replaced a whole bunch of `.offset(d as isize)`, you can see from the changes here that it's fairly common that code actually knows the order between the pointers and *wants* a `usize`, not an `isize`.
As a bonus, this can do `sub nuw`+`udiv exact`, rather than `sub`+`sdiv exact`, which can be optimized slightly better because it doesn't have to worry about negatives. That's why the slice iterators weren't using `offset_from`, though I haven't updated that code in this PR because slices are so perf-critical that I'll do it as its own change.
This is an intrinsic, like `offset_from`, so that it can eventually be allowed in CTFE. It also allows checking the extra safety condition -- see the test confirming that CTFE catches it if you pass the pointers in the wrong order.
Like we have `add`/`sub` which are the `usize` version of `offset`, this adds the `usize` equivalent of `offset_from`. Like how `.add(d)` replaced a whole bunch of `.offset(d as isize)`, you can see from the changes here that it's fairly common that code actually knows the order between the pointers and *wants* a `usize`, not an `isize`.
As a bonus, this can do `sub nuw`+`udiv exact`, rather than `sub`+`sdiv exact`, which can be optimized slightly better because it doesn't have to worry about negatives. That's why the slice iterators weren't using `offset_from`, though I haven't updated that code in this PR because slices are so perf-critical that I'll do it as its own change.
This is an intrinsic, like `offset_from`, so that it can eventually be allowed in CTFE. It also allows checking the extra safety condition -- see the test confirming that CTFE catches it if you pass the pointers in the wrong order.
Implement a lint to warn about unused macro rules
This implements a new lint to warn about unused macro rules (arms/matchers), similar to the `unused_macros` lint added by #41907 that warns about entire macros.
```rust
macro_rules! unused_empty {
(hello) => { println!("Hello, world!") };
() => { println!("empty") }; //~ ERROR: 1st rule of macro `unused_empty` is never used
}
fn main() {
unused_empty!(hello);
}
```
Builds upon #96149 and #96156.
Fixes#73576
Clarify that when `BorrowedHandle`, `OwnedHandle`, or `HandleOrNull`
hold the value `-1`, it always means the current process handle, and not
`INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE`.
Make `BorrowedFd::borrow_raw` a const fn.
Making `BorrowedFd::borrow_raw` a const fn allows it to be used to
create a constant `BorrowedFd<'static>` holding constants such as
`AT_FDCWD`. This will allow [`rustix::fs::cwd`] to become a const fn.
For consistency, make similar changes to `BorrowedHandle::borrow_raw`
and `BorrowedSocket::borrow_raw`.
[`rustix::fs::cwd`]: https://docs.rs/rustix/latest/rustix/fs/fn.cwd.html
r? `@joshtriplett`
Expose process windows_process_extensions_main_thread_handle on Windows
~~I did not find any tests in 7d3e03666a/library/std/src/sys/windows/process/tests.rs that actually launch processes, so I haven't added tests for this.~~ I ran the following locally, to check that it works as expected:
```rs
#![feature(windows_process_extensions_main_thread_handle)]
fn main() {
use std::os::windows::process::{ChildExt, CommandExt};
const CREATE_SUSPENDED: u32 = 0x00000004;
let proc = std::process::Command::new("cmd")
.args(["/C", "echo hello"])
.creation_flags(CREATE_SUSPENDED)
.spawn()
.unwrap();
extern "system" {
fn ResumeThread(_: *mut std::ffi::c_void) -> u32;
}
unsafe {
ResumeThread(proc.main_thread_handle());
}
let output = proc.wait_with_output().unwrap();
let str_output = std::str::from_utf8(&output.stdout[..]).unwrap();
println!("{}", str_output);
}
```
Without the feature attribute it wouldn't compile, and commenting the `ResumeThread` line makes it hang forever, showing that it works.
Trakcing issue https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/96723
Revert "Implement [OsStr]::join", which was merged without FCP.
This reverts commit 4fcbc53820, see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/96744. (I'm terribly sorry, and truly don't remember r+ing it, or even having seen it before yesterday, which is... genuinely very worrisome for me).
r? `@m-ou-se`
Warn on unused `#[doc(hidden)]` attributes on trait impl items
[Zulip conversation](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/266220-rustdoc/topic/.E2.9C.94.20Validy.20checks.20for.20.60.23.5Bdoc.28hidden.29.5D.60).
Whether an associated item in a trait impl is shown or hidden in the documentation entirely depends on the corresponding item in the trait declaration. Rustdoc completely ignores `#[doc(hidden)]` attributes on impl items. No error or warning is emitted:
```rust
pub trait Tr { fn f(); }
pub struct Ty;
impl Tr for Ty { #[doc(hidden)] fn f() {} }
// ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ignored by rustdoc and currently
// no error or warning issued
```
This may lead users to the wrong belief that the attribute has an effect. In fact, several such cases are found in the standard library (I've removed all of them in this PR).
There does not seem to exist any incentive to allow this in the future either: Impl'ing a trait for a type means the type *fully* conforms to its API. Users can add `#[doc(hidden)]` to the whole impl if they want to hide the implementation or add the attribute to the corresponding associated item in the trait declaration to hide the specific item. Hiding an implementation of an associated item does not make much sense: The associated item can still be found on the trait page.
This PR emits the warn-by-default lint `unused_attribute` for this case with a future-incompat warning.
`@rustbot` label T-compiler T-rustdoc A-lint
Improve floating point documentation
This is my attempt to improve/solve https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/95468 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/73328 .
Added/refined explanations:
- Refine the "NaN as a special value" top level explanation of f32
- Refine `const NAN` docstring: add an explanation about there being multitude of NaN bitpatterns and disclaimer about the portability/stability guarantees.
- Refine `fn is_sign_positive` and `fn is_sign_negative` docstrings: add disclaimer about the sign bit of NaNs.
- Refine `fn min` and `fn max` docstrings: explain the semantics and their relationship to the standard and libm better.
- Refine `fn trunc` docstrings: explain the semantics slightly more.
- Refine `fn powi` docstrings: add disclaimer that the rounding behaviour might be different from `powf`.
- Refine `fn copysign` docstrings: add disclaimer about payloads of NaNs.
- Refine `minimum` and `maximum`: add disclaimer that "propagating NaN" doesn't mean that propagating the NaN bit patterns is guaranteed.
- Refine `max` and `min` docstrings: add "ignoring NaN" to bring the one-row explanation to parity with `minimum` and `maximum`.
Cosmetic changes:
- Reword `NaN` and `NAN` as plain "NaN", unless they refer to the specific `const NAN`.
- Reword "a number" to `self` in function docstrings to clarify.
- Remove "Returns NAN if the number is NAN" from `abs`, as this is told to be the default behavior in the top explanation.
Remove `#[rustc_deprecated]`
This removes `#[rustc_deprecated]` and introduces diagnostics to help users to the right direction (that being `#[deprecated]`). All uses of `#[rustc_deprecated]` have been converted. CI is expected to fail initially; this requires #95958, which includes converting `stdarch`.
I plan on following up in a short while (maybe a bootstrap cycle?) removing the diagnostics, as they're only intended to be short-term.
Further elaborate the lack of guarantees from `Hasher`
I realized that I got too excited in #94598 by adding new methods, and forgot to do the documentation to really answer the core question in #94026.
This PR just has that doc update.
r? `@Amanieu`
Add more diagnostic items
This just adds a handful diagnostic items I noticed were missing.
Would it be worth doing this for all of the remaining types? I'm willing to do it if it'd be helpful.
Create clippy lint against unexpectedly late drop for temporaries in match scrutinee expressions
A new clippy lint for issue 93883 (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/93883). Relies on a new trait in `marker` (called `SignificantDrop` to enable linting), which is why this PR is for the rust-lang repo and not the clippy repo.
changelog: new lint [`significant_drop_in_scrutinee`]
Remove hard links from `env::current_exe` security example
The security example shows that `env::current_exe` will return the path used when the program was started. This is not really surprising considering how hard links work: after `ln foo bar`, the two files are _equivalent_. It is _not_ the case that `bar` is a “link” to `foo`, nor is `foo` a link to `bar`. They are simply two names for the same underlying data.
The security vulnerability linked to seems to be different: there an attacker would start a SUID binary from a directory under the control of the attacker. The binary would respawn itself by executing the program found at `/proc/self/exe` (which the attacker can control). This is a real problem. In my opinion, the example given here doesn’t really show the same problem, it just shows a misunderstanding of what hard links are.
I looked through the history a bit and found that the example was introduced in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/33526. That PR actually has two commits, and the first (8478d48dad) explains the race condition at the root of the linked security vulnerability. The second commit proceeds to replace the explanation with the example we have today.
This commit reverts most of the second commit from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/33526.
Add aliases for std::fs::canonicalize
The aliases are `realpath` and `GetFinalPathNameByHandle` which are explicitly mentioned in `canonicalize`'s documentation.
Link to correct `as_mut` in docs for `pointer::as_ref`
It previously linked to the unstable const-mut-cast method instead of
the `mut` counterpart for `as_ref`.
Closes#96327
Use 64-bit time on 32-bit linux-gnu
The standard library suffered the [Year 2038 problem][Y2038] in two main places on targets with 32-bit `time_t`:
- In `std::time::SystemTime`, we stored a `timespec` that has `time_t` seconds. This is now changed to directly store 64-bit seconds and nanoseconds, and on 32-bit linux-gnu we try to use `__clock_gettime64` (glibc 2.34+) to get the larger timestamp.
- In `std::fs::Metadata`, we store a `stat64`, which has 64-bit `off_t` but still 32-bit `time_t`, and unfortunately that is baked in the API by the (deprecated) `MetadataExt::as_raw_stat()`. However, we can use `statx` for 64-bit `statx_timestamp` to store in addition to the `stat64`, as we already do to support creation time, and the rest of the `MetadataExt` methods can return those full values. Note that some filesystems may still be limited in their actual timestamp support, but that's not something Rust can change.
There remain a few places that need `timespec` for system call timeouts -- I leave that to future work.
[Y2038]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_2038_problem
